Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death Penalty Talking Points (Amazingly, the Left shows its hand)
The Nation ^ | December 18, 2002 | Lisa Weinert

Posted on 05/29/2003 4:59:23 PM PDT by rdb3

Death Penalty Talking Points

by _NONE

[posted online on December 18, 2002]

1. It is morally reprehensible to take a life, and it is especially reprehensible for the state to do so.

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." --Mahatma Gandhi

2. Executing innocent people outweighs any logic behind the death penalty.

Between 1973 and 2001, 89 death-row inmates were found to be innocent and subsequently were exonerated, escaping death by hours in some cases (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

3. Race is often a defining factor in death-penalty cases.

The United States favors prosecuting when the victim is white. More than 80 percent of completed capital cases involve a white victim, even though nationally 50 percent of murder victims are white (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

Jurors are far more likely to recommend the death penalty for people of color. Between 1995 and 2000, 75 percent of the federal cases in which juries recommended the death penalty involved black or Latino defendants (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

4. Whether or not the death penalty is applied depends largely on the quality of legal representation for the accused, and most death-row inmates cannot afford decent representation.

The Texas Defender Service concluded that defendants in that state have more than a one in three chance of being executed without benefit of competent appellate attorneys (Washington Post, January 4, 2002).

5. The death penalty does not deter crime.

The United States has a murder rate three times higher than that of European countries, all of whom have abolished capital punishment (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

There is no solid evidence that the death penalty decreases crime. Former Attorney General Janet Reno says, "I have inquired for most of my adult life about studies that might show that the death penalty is a deterrent. And I have not seen any research that would substantiate that point" (Reuters, January 21, 2000).

6. It is impossible for the death penalty to ever be administered fairly, given our legal system, and it is therefore unquestionably unconstitutional, because defendants often do not receive a fair trial.

Between 1973 and 1995, seven out of ten death-penalty cases were thrown out on appeal due to flaws in the trial (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

7. Administering the death penalty is far more expensive than imprisoning the offender for life.

Sending a killer to death row costs an average of $2.3 million (Dallas Morning News), three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for forty years (Jackson, Jackson Jr., Shapiro, Legal Lynching, The New Press).

Florida has spent more than $51 million a year more on state executions than it would have spent on punishing all first-degree murderers with life in prison without parole, according to the Palm Beach Post (Jackson, Jackson Jr., Shapiro, Legal Lynching, The New Press).

8. Capital punishment is administered cruelly, arbitrarily and unfairly.

Between 1982 and 2001, at least thirty-two executions went brutally awry. On April 22, 1983, it took fourteen minutes for the State of Alabama to electrocute John Evans. The executioner re-attached a burning electrode to Evans's leg twice, ignoring pleas from the defense lawyer, while the room filled with smoke and the smell of burning flesh. Evans's body was left charred and smoldering (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

Jeb and George W. Bush, among many others, have also expedited the appeals process, to execute as many prisoners in as short a period of time as possible, which increases the likelihood of error. As Governor of Texas, George W. Bush was the most active executioner in the nation, killing on average one prisoner every other week (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

9. The United States is one of the only First World country that still executes its citizens.

With its use of the death penalty, the United States is in league with Iraq, Yemen, Iran, China and Congo. Our continued use of the death penalty causes constant friction with US allies (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

10. The United States executes mentally retarded people and children.

Currently the state of Virginia is seeking to execute 17 year-old Lee Malvo. Iran and Nigeria are the only other countries who execute children, according to a 2001 Human Rights Watch Report on Children's Rights. Although a recent Supreme Court decision declared the execution of mentally retarded inmates unconstitutional (Atkins vs. Virginia), death row inmates who would be considered mentally retarded by the American Association on Mental Retardation may be executed, since states have the authority to define what constitutes mental retardation; while the AAMR defines mental retardation as having an IQ of 70 or below, states currently have the right to define mentally retardation differently. Thus, mentally retarded inmates are still at risk.

Compiled by Lisa Weinert


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deathpenalty; talkingpoints
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: Sonny M
Sonny M

Ok I'll poke my head up out of the ground long enough to get it pounded back down in.

I do understand the difference between murdering an innocent unborn baby and executing a guilty adult. However, to me it is more about the "spirit" behind the thing. When I watch one of those "execution parties" with people standing outside cheering it on, they have the same hateful faces as all the pro-mass murderer of babies scum. An execution of a criminal deserving of punishment shouldn't be a party. It should be a sobering moment where we as a nation realize the enormity of taking a life even though the punishment is just.

I don't argue that the punishment is unjust but that I don't like the sickos outside cheering. That is my Conservative Christian stance. What irks me the most is those sickos claim to be God-fearing Christians. They need to read the bible and understand that at some point we must forgive because we have been forgiven. They will face their Maker just like that executed murderer will face Judgement. The murderer may have repented... will see Eternal Life and they may be vengeful and unforgiving... facing Eternal Punishment.
81 posted on 05/30/2003 1:47:21 PM PDT by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kuma
I believe in executing murders, no doubt about that, but I am not sadistic enough to enjoy people dying. I see it as a punishment served, not something to cheer and have fun with. They do wrong, they get what they deserved, and I'm happy, execution parties are just bizarre, but then again, if I lost a loved one, and the person who killed them was being executed, I might feel differently.
82 posted on 05/30/2003 3:22:22 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
NOBODY reads this marxist rag, the Nation anyway. Is probably kept alive by "foundation money".

and often found at eye level on the periodical rack of today's public high school libraries

83 posted on 05/30/2003 8:23:55 PM PDT by Optimist (I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bluesagewoman
ABORTION Talking Points
by AmIa Liar, II

1. It is morally reprehensible to take a life, and it is especially reprehensible for the state to do so.

2. ABORTING innocent CHILDREN outweighs any logic behind PRO-CHOICE.

3. Race is often a defining factor in ABORTION cases.

4. Whether or not ABORTION is DECIDED depends largely on the quality of COUNSELING for the mother, and ALL ABORTED FETUSES DO NOT RECEIVE decent representation.

5. The ABORTION does not deter IMMORALITY.

6. It is impossible for ABORTIONS to ever be administered fairly, given our COUNSELING system, and it is therefore unquestionably unconstitutional, because FETUSES often do not receive a fair CONSIDERATION.

7. Administering the ABORTION is far more expensive than PUTTING the CHILD for ADOPTION.

8. ABORTION is administered cruelly, arbitrarily and unfairly.

9. The United States is one of the only First World country that still ABORTS its CHILDREN.

10. The United States ABORTS mentally retarded children.

84 posted on 05/30/2003 8:43:00 PM PDT by Optimist (I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Optimist
Wow! Did you come up with those? Very, very poignant. I think you should post it on its own thread with the 2 sets of talking points set side by side! Great job!
85 posted on 05/30/2003 8:55:47 PM PDT by bluesagewoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
You are a moron. I never said anywhere that no one should go to jail.

"Does your zeal for justice continue through to the sentencing and punishment for other crimes? A man may be put in jail for 40 years due to charges of armed robbery. What if he actually was innocent? Forty years is a long time to be punished."

Yes, 40 years is a long time to be punished. But if somewhere in there it turns out the man is innocent, AT LEAST HE AIN'T DEAD.
86 posted on 05/31/2003 2:31:26 AM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
That is not an abortion. An ectopic pregnancy has NO chance, EVER, of surviving. It may be medically defined as an abortion, but so is a miscarriage. In neither case is there a chance of the baby surviving.
87 posted on 05/31/2003 2:34:48 AM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Optimist
NOBODY reads this marxist rag, the Nation anyway. Is probably kept alive by "foundation money".

and often found at eye level on the periodical rack of today's public high school libraries

And when they get to college it gets worse, Marx himself becomes more prevalent with MORONS from the 60's radicalism dominating the campuses, ugh.

88 posted on 05/31/2003 7:01:29 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: SendShaqtoIraq
Actually, to willfully terminate a pregnancy is an abortion. It might also be of interest to you that an ectopic pregnancy was recently delivered alive and healthy following a difficult C-section where the 'placental body' (the baby and her space capsule) was removed from its attached location of the Mother's liver. [I don't toss assertions around willy nilly. There is something to back up the things I offer; my honesty is at stake as a writer, fellow freeper. When I offer pure speculation, it will be characterized as such. You might enjoy reading the essay on my profile page, or the essay now linked on the right-hand margin title 'The Amorality of Science Has Won'. BTW, I'd love to have Shaq as the Sheriff of my resident county, when he decides to stop playing basketball. He's one cool giant of a man, giant in more ways than just his height ... kind of a modern Bill Russell, if you know what I mean in my respect for Mister Russell.]
89 posted on 05/31/2003 8:41:53 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
1. It is morally reprehensible to take a life, and it is especially reprehensible for the state to do so.

Hogwash. It is the only valid response to certain crimes of such depravity they remove the perpetrator from the right to human protection.

2. Executing innocent people outweighs any logic behind the death penalty.

Between 1973 and 2001, 89 death-row inmates were found to be innocent and subsequently were exonerated, escaping death by hours in some cases (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

They were also found GUILTY long before they were found innocent. The legal finding of innocence does not equate to innocence unless the legal finding of guilty equates to guilt. The system seems to work far harder to exonerate this trash than to execute it. But all the legal technicalities in the world don't change the FACTS.

3. Race is often a defining factor in death-penalty cases.

Race is often cited as an aggravating circumstance when it is committed by Whites against Blacks. In the name of equity, the same must be true in reverse. In any case, all this means is that we should be executing MORE perpetrators, not fewer.

4. Whether or not the death penalty is applied depends largely on the quality of legal representation for the accused, and most death-row inmates cannot afford decent representation.

Whether or not ANY penalty is applied depends largely on the quality of legal representation. Most death-row inmates are animated refuse who have preyed on society their whole lives. By my reckoning, they don't deserve ANY representation.

5. The death penalty does not deter crime.

It isn't supposed to. Criminal penalties are retributive, not preventitive. Besides, the death penalty most certainly does deter the executed person. No person put to death has ever committed another crime following completion of the sentence.

6. It is impossible for the death penalty to ever be administered fairly, given our legal system, and it is therefore unquestionably unconstitutional, because defendants often do not receive a fair trial.

Between 1973 and 1995, seven out of ten death-penalty cases were thrown out on appeal due to flaws in the trial (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

Then stop throwing them out.

7. Administering the death penalty is far more expensive than imprisoning the offender for life.

Carrying out a death sentence costs about 7 1/2 cents, the price of a .45 caliber cartridge administered by a volunteer to the back of the convicted person's head. And, like the Chinese, we can send a bill to the next of kin.

8. Capital punishment is administered cruelly, arbitrarily and unfairly.

See above.

9. The United States is one of the only First World country that still executes its citizens.

It's great to be an American!

10. The United States executes mentally retarded people and children.

First of all, this is a crock. But even if it's true, so what?

90 posted on 05/31/2003 11:37:32 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson