Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death Penalty Talking Points (Amazingly, the Left shows its hand)
The Nation ^ | December 18, 2002 | Lisa Weinert

Posted on 05/29/2003 4:59:23 PM PDT by rdb3

Death Penalty Talking Points

by _NONE

[posted online on December 18, 2002]

1. It is morally reprehensible to take a life, and it is especially reprehensible for the state to do so.

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." --Mahatma Gandhi

2. Executing innocent people outweighs any logic behind the death penalty.

Between 1973 and 2001, 89 death-row inmates were found to be innocent and subsequently were exonerated, escaping death by hours in some cases (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

3. Race is often a defining factor in death-penalty cases.

The United States favors prosecuting when the victim is white. More than 80 percent of completed capital cases involve a white victim, even though nationally 50 percent of murder victims are white (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

Jurors are far more likely to recommend the death penalty for people of color. Between 1995 and 2000, 75 percent of the federal cases in which juries recommended the death penalty involved black or Latino defendants (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

4. Whether or not the death penalty is applied depends largely on the quality of legal representation for the accused, and most death-row inmates cannot afford decent representation.

The Texas Defender Service concluded that defendants in that state have more than a one in three chance of being executed without benefit of competent appellate attorneys (Washington Post, January 4, 2002).

5. The death penalty does not deter crime.

The United States has a murder rate three times higher than that of European countries, all of whom have abolished capital punishment (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

There is no solid evidence that the death penalty decreases crime. Former Attorney General Janet Reno says, "I have inquired for most of my adult life about studies that might show that the death penalty is a deterrent. And I have not seen any research that would substantiate that point" (Reuters, January 21, 2000).

6. It is impossible for the death penalty to ever be administered fairly, given our legal system, and it is therefore unquestionably unconstitutional, because defendants often do not receive a fair trial.

Between 1973 and 1995, seven out of ten death-penalty cases were thrown out on appeal due to flaws in the trial (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

7. Administering the death penalty is far more expensive than imprisoning the offender for life.

Sending a killer to death row costs an average of $2.3 million (Dallas Morning News), three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for forty years (Jackson, Jackson Jr., Shapiro, Legal Lynching, The New Press).

Florida has spent more than $51 million a year more on state executions than it would have spent on punishing all first-degree murderers with life in prison without parole, according to the Palm Beach Post (Jackson, Jackson Jr., Shapiro, Legal Lynching, The New Press).

8. Capital punishment is administered cruelly, arbitrarily and unfairly.

Between 1982 and 2001, at least thirty-two executions went brutally awry. On April 22, 1983, it took fourteen minutes for the State of Alabama to electrocute John Evans. The executioner re-attached a burning electrode to Evans's leg twice, ignoring pleas from the defense lawyer, while the room filled with smoke and the smell of burning flesh. Evans's body was left charred and smoldering (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

Jeb and George W. Bush, among many others, have also expedited the appeals process, to execute as many prisoners in as short a period of time as possible, which increases the likelihood of error. As Governor of Texas, George W. Bush was the most active executioner in the nation, killing on average one prisoner every other week (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

9. The United States is one of the only First World country that still executes its citizens.

With its use of the death penalty, the United States is in league with Iraq, Yemen, Iran, China and Congo. Our continued use of the death penalty causes constant friction with US allies (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

10. The United States executes mentally retarded people and children.

Currently the state of Virginia is seeking to execute 17 year-old Lee Malvo. Iran and Nigeria are the only other countries who execute children, according to a 2001 Human Rights Watch Report on Children's Rights. Although a recent Supreme Court decision declared the execution of mentally retarded inmates unconstitutional (Atkins vs. Virginia), death row inmates who would be considered mentally retarded by the American Association on Mental Retardation may be executed, since states have the authority to define what constitutes mental retardation; while the AAMR defines mental retardation as having an IQ of 70 or below, states currently have the right to define mentally retardation differently. Thus, mentally retarded inmates are still at risk.

Compiled by Lisa Weinert


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deathpenalty; talkingpoints
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Yes you, this "break news" literature from 2002 is full of their cliques.

Hello! It's from The Nation for crying out loud.

Look at how I rephrased the title. I purposefully added "Amazingly, the Left shows its hand."

So now I guess I agree with the article and am now against the death penalty. Gimme a break, puh-leeze!


The bombing starts in five minutes.

41 posted on 05/29/2003 9:12:13 PM PDT by rdb3 (Nerve-racking since 0413hrs on XII-XXII-MCMLXXI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The Nation is a Communist paper. Why is it given credibility by our media? I guess they think everyone is dummied down and won't remember the roots of this paper.
42 posted on 05/29/2003 9:21:05 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I understand what you added to the title....so?

I was hoping that was what your point was, its hypocritical to be against the DP, but proabortion, but your in title/first post there certainly was too little indication of that how you were defining "show their hand".

I'm pleased you aren't with those on the right who do define their pretentious beliefs against DP, but you do need to s'plain these things, don't assert it. There are many in the Catholic Church (left) who are adamently against the DP who are characterized as the "religious Right." I'm a Catholic so I hear this cr@p too much and I fight against it being defined as Conservative, sorry to jump down your throat.

43 posted on 05/29/2003 9:49:39 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Press Secret; Of 2 million Shiite pilgrims, only 3000 chanted anti Americanisms--source-Islamonline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I would be willing to bet my life that not one executed criminal has ever committed another crime following his/her execution ... and I would make the same bet that not a single grandchild has been born to an individual abortion killed prior to birth. There's something rather final about both perspectives, but society has a right to protect its citizens from criminals who commit capital crimes. I'm still trying to find the paralleling antithesis to apply for the little ones purposely killed my approved serial killers.
44 posted on 05/29/2003 9:56:10 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I think it's very valid to take their arguments, every one of them, and apply them to abortion. Now, of course, if you run into someone who is opposed to both the death penalty AND abortion, this tactic won't work. But I suppose if someone were against both they probably wouldn't offend Freepers as much.
45 posted on 05/29/2003 10:13:17 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
I'm not so sure about that, recent polls that I have seen, show 2 things, opposition against abortion is rising, and in equal and corresponding numbers, opposition to the death penalty is growing.

These are salient points.

I think everybody is being a little hoodwinked here.

The Nation ran this. What if we assume that this is not a tipping of the hand, but a faux tipping of the hand? The greatest political ability is the ability to set the agenda. Do we want to run in 2004 on the death penalty?

No. We want to run on the success in the war. Face it.

Getting into hair-splitting semantics about the death penalty (which I seem to shift positions on about five times a day, although I always end up leaning right) creates opposition and dissent in our camp, not theirs.

Why let it? Most of us are in agreement on this issue. The few who are not in agreement (on our side) do not see it as a defining issue.

Let's not make it one. ;-)

How about taking third-trimester abortion and repeatedly shoving that down the Dems' throats? Make sure we take the agenda -- that we are proactive, and not reactive.

46 posted on 05/29/2003 10:13:37 PM PDT by Kip Lange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
Hmm, let's see, the unborn alive little one is totally innocent and never give a 'fair trial' but the woman giving life support to her can pass a death sentence upon that innocent little baby waiting to be bor ... a capital criminal has at the very least some evidence to stand as convicting to guilt toward fellow human beings. ... No, I don't think it will wash.
47 posted on 05/29/2003 10:19:47 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
But all that said, I'd be willing to end the death penalty if abortion on deamnd also ended and abortion became used as a medical procedure only to save a woman's life endangered by a continuing pregnancy.
48 posted on 05/29/2003 10:21:46 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Between 1973 and 2001, 89 death-row inmates were found to be innocent and subsequently were exonerated, escaping death by hours in some cases (The Nation, January 8-15, 2001).

Thats a lie.

49 posted on 05/29/2003 10:21:53 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; mhking; Jim Robinson; John Robinson
It has occurred to me that there is no index for black issues. I double checked the bump list register and found Latin American, Native American, Zionist, reverse racism, but nothing for black issues. One should be created. I read an article recently about black incarceration and it would be easy to find with an index (bump) list.

I know the bump list register was closed to new additions but perhaps an exception could be made for this since we have so many articles dealing with black issues and mhking can't ping everyone of them.

50 posted on 05/29/2003 10:30:03 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kip Lange
Further note to self: If we do actually want to bring this issue out in force (why, I don't know), reframe to: Crime. Republicans have better track records on crime; the death penalty is merely an outgrowth of the majority of conservative 'Pub's approach to crime. Why immediately jump to the death penalty? Why approach a lit powderkeg with a match?
51 posted on 05/29/2003 10:35:17 PM PDT by Kip Lange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
I second that notion.
52 posted on 05/29/2003 10:36:04 PM PDT by Kip Lange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
It is a lie in the 'mischaracterization' category so dear to the lying liberal heart. That an inmate's guilt might come to be legally questionable as he/she approaches execution is all that need be presented for a stay of execution, and that stay is at the discretion of a judge in some states, the Governor in some states, and even a prison warden or the president of the U.S. can issue a stay in some states. A stay doesn't mean automatic innocence.
53 posted on 05/29/2003 10:36:11 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kip Lange
We will probably have to petition for one. Let the powers that be know of your support.
54 posted on 05/29/2003 10:43:35 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; mhking; Admin Moderator; jimrob
Agreed. Pinging the powers that be...see farmfriend's original post.
55 posted on 05/29/2003 10:52:17 PM PDT by Kip Lange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Kip Lange
Listen, I believe that life begins at conception, my arguement against abortion and for the death penalty has been simple.

When unborn children start killing people, then I will start re-thinking this, but untill then, I don't believe children should be murdered.

However, looking at polls, both in college, and even, going over to the DUmpster, suggest the same thing, we have a growing pro-life group in this country, the problem is, they consider themselves "true pro-life", they do not like the death penalty, or abortion but they will vote republican, because they hate abortion, but they are NOT pro-death penalty.

I meet people who are like this too every other day, I am not going to blame certain groups, but it is wierd, they do not differentiate between killing somone and commiting no crime, to them, murder or no murder, no one should die, honestly, somone is influential on these kids, I don't know who, and I do not like it, because if these kids can not see the difference between guilt and innocence, we are lost.

56 posted on 05/29/2003 11:17:14 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
I am not challenging your argument in the least. I am questioning the merits of allowing ourselves to become divided on an issue where we naturally are usually united.

Your points regarding personal responsibility and accountability are very well-taken. Understand that I am only arguing election-year realpolitik here. On principle, I agree with you about 95% (the only 5% that waffles is the 5% that goes into deep internal philosophical debates regarding "dharmic order", so to speak).
57 posted on 05/29/2003 11:30:53 PM PDT by Kip Lange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
Further response...I share your outrage on the issue of "the line must be drawn *somewhere*".
58 posted on 05/29/2003 11:34:36 PM PDT by Kip Lange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Exactly.
59 posted on 05/30/2003 12:16:46 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
"The death penalty does not deter crime.

The United States has a murder rate three times higher than that of European countries, all of whom have abolished capital punishment (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org).

There is no solid evidence that the death penalty decreases crime. Former Attorney General Janet Reno says, "I have inquired for most of my adult life about studies that might show that the death penalty is a deterrent. And I have not seen any research that would substantiate that point" (Reuters, January 21, 2000)."

The death penalty here doesn't deter crime because the criminal is given years and years to appeal; future criminals see no real connection with their prospective crime and eventual execution. If the execution were carried out quickly after sentencing, we WOULD see a decrease in that type of crime.
That said, I oppose the death penalty because if one innocent is wrongly executed, it is one too many.

"Administering the death penalty is far more expensive than imprisoning the offender for life.

Sending a killer to death row costs an average of $2.3 million (Dallas Morning News), three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for forty years (Jackson, Jackson Jr., Shapiro, Legal Lynching, The New Press).

Florida has spent more than $51 million a year more on state executions than it would have spent on punishing all first-degree murderers with life in prison without parole, according to the Palm Beach Post (Jackson, Jackson Jr., Shapiro, Legal Lynching, The New Press)."

NO. It isn't the administering of the death penalty that costs so much. It is the ENDLESS appeal process.

Some criminals deserve to be executed, but until there is a fool proof way to keep innocent people from being convicted, I have to be against it in any case. However, there should be NO parole for those convicted of violent offenses. "Sentenced to life in prison" should mean "as long as you have life, you remain in prison." Still no picnic for someone wrongly convicted, but at least they still have a chance of being exonerated.
60 posted on 05/30/2003 12:31:01 AM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson