[alloysteel]

But, but, but....We have it on good authority, from Senators Bob Graham of Florida and Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, that the stories about WMD were complete fabrications, based on bad intelligence and excesively hyped by the Bush Administration. And those distinguished gentlemen wouldn't LIE, would they?

[AntiGuv]

Clearly, the Iraqis proved themselves so astoundingly incompetent in every single endeavor they undertook because their diabolical genius was devoted exclusively toward the concealment of the WMDs...

[Eustace]

Of course he can deny a false pretext for the war/slaughter of Iraqi's.

But only because what's in the papers is false.

He can't deny the real reason the attack on a nation controlled by a Bush ally happened though.

It happened to drive a wedge between Muslims and Christians. Something we will pay for in the near future.

[Jorge]

The attempts by some on the left to claim Bush lied about WMDs so he could have his Iraq war are ridiculous.

Even the countries who opposed going to war admitted that Iraq had WMDs.

Besides they've already found the WMD labs on wheels...and will find more.

I wonder if these same people would accuse the police of being liars if they raided a house for drugs... but only found a Meth Lab.

[ladyinred]

Oh for pete's sake. I see reports of findings all of the time, and what was in the river, koolaide?
And once again, the time Saddam had while the liberals insisted on messing with the UN was enough for him to hide or destroy an entire mountain of WMD. Why should they care? We saw enough evidence of outrageous cruelty to the Iraquis to last a lifetime.

[RusIvan]

During a radio interview, Rumsfeld expressed fresh confidence that such weapons of mass destruction would be found in Iraq, and offered several explanations for why they have not been located. ++

So he continue to deny and express confidence in same time:)).
Why don't he just agree that he made mistake with all this WMD issue?