Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Choosing Between Republicans And Democrats Is Like Choosing Between Pharisees and Sadducees
Chuck Baldwin Live ^ | May 28, 2003 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 05/29/2003 9:45:56 AM PDT by xyggyx

Food For Thought From The Chuck Wagon May 28, 2003

When our Lord walked this earth, there were two major "parties" leading the Jewish people: the Pharisees and the Sadducees. Both of these groups posed major problems for Christ. Furthermore, though each group opposed the other, neither of them represented the truth. We have a very similar situation today in the United States with the two major political parties. In fact, the two major parties are eerily similar to those two problem-groups of Jesus' day.

Pharisees were the "conservatives" of their day. They believed in God and in personal morality. On the other hand, Sadducees were the "liberals" of their day. They were blatantly secular in philosophy and conduct. If they were yet with us today, Pharisees would doubtless feel right at home in the Republican Party, while Sadducees would fit right in with the Democratic Party.

While the Pharisees and Sadducees fiercely fought each other, they were both the enemies of Christ. When it came to supporting error and opposing truth, they were united. The same is true today with the Republican and Democratic parties.

Republicans and Democrats only argue about things that have to do with enriching each party's power and influence. On matters of substance, however, they are mostly united.

For example, neither party gives a flip about what the U.S. Constitution says. The only time they refer to it is when they seek an advantage over the other party. On the whole, elected public officials from both parties take their oath of office about as seriously as a lion takes the hissing of an opossum.

Beyond that, neither party believes in the principle of limited government. The size and scope of the federal government continues to skyrocket regardless of which party is in power. Republicans increase government by incurring debt; Democrats increase government by raising taxes. The result is the same: government gets bigger and bigger, while freedom gets smaller and smaller.

Furthermore, Pharisees and Sadducees alike supported Caesar. In fact, this was one of the central charges against Christ: He was seen as a rebel who refused to acknowledge the divine authority of Caesar. Because of this, Jesus was branded "unpatriotic." This ultimately led to His crucifixion. Conservatives today are doing the same thing.

Anyone who refuses to acknowledge that President Bush has been given divine authority to act outside the U.S. Constitution is branded as unpatriotic or worse. Several conservatives have even gone so far as to call G. W. Bush, "America's King." To them, Bush is Caesar, and America is an empire.

In the meantime, both parties continue to ignore or expunge the principles of truth and righteousness upon which our country was founded. Therefore, choosing between Republicans and Democrats is like choosing between Pharisees and Sadducees.

(Excerpt) Read more at chuckbaldwinlive.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christ; democrat; politics; religion; republican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: xrp
Amen to that!
61 posted on 05/29/2003 2:32:29 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
What's the process for doing a convention, maybe we should do precisely that.
62 posted on 05/29/2003 2:35:55 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
350 billion out of 36 trillion over ten years is significant? Perhaps you don't understand the mathmatics involved here.

It's a drop in the bucket but the Dems would have raised taxes, instead. My first choice is to get the whole thing at once, but getting it incrementally is preferable to nothing. It's driving the Dems nuts.

The only agency that actually folded into the Homeland Security Department was the INS. The rest exist as they always have and will continue until my death.<.i>

I think 18 or 20 agencies, including the Coast Guard merged into the DHS. I want to see more merges and the Dems won't do it.

63 posted on 05/29/2003 6:18:16 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Consort
My first choice is to get the whole thing at once, but getting it incrementally is preferable to nothing.

They need to stop being spineless weenies and listen to their constituency. If they f' up now they'll be screwed for a long time to come.

I think 18 or 20 agencies, including the Coast Guard merged into the DHS. I want to see more merges and the Dems won't do it.

I know that RSPA did but it still exists as a separate entity, the new agency is essentially a big matrix of dotted lines to the existing agencies. They haven't eliminated the agencies they've just changed their organizational structure.

64 posted on 05/29/2003 7:47:37 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
You're going to have to move to France. You'll never be happy here. Why drive yourself crazy?
65 posted on 05/29/2003 8:02:46 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Consort
There's an unpleasant thought. I tend to be a man of action not words, maybe I need to start my own movement. :-)
66 posted on 05/29/2003 8:12:45 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
It's in the constitution....There has to be a 3/4th's majority agreement in the house and senate and the states need to be on board(can't remember how many). I'd have to look at the constitution again...it's been a long time since I've reviewed it.
67 posted on 05/30/2003 1:38:40 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan
It's in the constitution....There has to be a 3/4th's majority agreement in the house and senate and the states need to be on board(can't remember how many). I'd have to look at the constitution again...it's been a long time since I've reviewed it.
68 posted on 05/30/2003 1:38:56 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson