[Alberta's Child]

I don't support that the end justify's the means logic, but Bill Clinton allowd the terrorist's free access to destruction of America by doing nothing.

This might be a valid point, but it will hold absolutely no water with me until Bill Clinton is spending the rest of his life in Leavenworth for dereliction of duty. If what you have said is true, then Bill Clinton was a bigger threat to this country than Saddam Hussein was.

For crying out loud -- the same nation that considered it such a "moral imperative" to topple Saddam Hussein can't even muster the outrage to take this f#cker's pension away from him.

[Issaquahking]

Starting to sound more like a frog more than a freeper but that is strictly my opinion...back to the facts. Former IMPEACHED President of the U.S.A. is a has been. No sense in chasing a common scoundrel when you can take down the one of the world's worst despotic criminal regimes.
We have a very QUALIFIED President now in the White house now and he is solving current problems for The World's Greatest country, amongst many other things on his plate.
Besides, you currently have a Clinton for your PM at this time, don't you?