[Mr. Mojo]

Nothing short of incredible.

[dagnabbit]

Such management action may someday elevate that paper's best use from bird cage liner up to fish wrapper.

[DoughtyOne]

I do not believe the editors at the Times ever considered themselves to be as leftist as they are in reality. I honestly think they surround themselves with other idiotic liberals who echo their own views so much so, that they think everyone (or at least most people) think as they do.

This guy sounds as if he understands the problem on one issue. It remains to be seen if he will begin to recognize this problem in it's entirity. It's our job to politely point out to him the problems we see in his paper.

I don't think we should burry him with notes calling him all sorts of names. I think we should document other articles that do the same thing he has pointed out.

I also think we should ask valid questions like, "Why do you keep people like Paul Sherer on staff, when their views are so radical that they can't possibly be supported by more than 0.00005% of the populace at large?" Who are you trying to reach with such a fringe writer?

Perhaps we'll see a change at the Times. It must occur to them that it's strange that they can't sell more than 1 million papers in an area with a populace of 15 million.

[the lone wolf]

If "John" here keeps this up, he will be working for FNC in less that a year.

[Mister Baredog]

Memo on abortion and liberal bias by Los Angeles Times Editor John Carroll, May 22, 2003

Being a sort of newbie I don't know how to get this reposted to the top for further discussion, this one sneaked by a lot of commentary I know is out there, I would like more FReepers to be aware of this memo. Thanks in advance!