Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: Presidents' private lives are fair game to a point
Boston.com ^ | 5-28-03 | Martin Finucane

Posted on 05/28/2003 7:09:03 PM PDT by Paul Atreides

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:09:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

BOSTON (AP) Former President Bill Clinton said Wednesday that a president's private life is a legitimate subject for historians to study, but he decried the scrutiny of his private life he endured during his two terms in the White House.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: scum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2003 7:09:04 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
But he also said he missed the work and the people. ''It's a good thing we've got the term limits or you'd have had to throw me out,'' he said.

What an jerk.

2 posted on 05/28/2003 7:09:47 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
he decried the scrutiny of his private life he endured during his two terms in the White House

Maybe he was ill suited for the line of work he chose. Just a thought.

3 posted on 05/28/2003 7:12:47 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
When you have a strange women brought into a hotel room by state troopers and stick your penis in her face, it's not your private life. It's also an indication of serious mental instability which should disqualify you for the presidency.
4 posted on 05/28/2003 7:13:18 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
. . . "sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Get off the stage, dirtball.

5 posted on 05/28/2003 7:14:52 PM PDT by mombonn (Have you prayed for our President yet today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"Looking fit in a blue suit and green tie" Probably some sort of national security secret signal for the Chinese.
6 posted on 05/28/2003 7:16:12 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"Jerk"?

"Whore" is the correct term.

7 posted on 05/28/2003 7:17:15 PM PDT by Chairman Fred (@mousiedung.commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
...lying POS.....that's all I have to say about that!
8 posted on 05/28/2003 7:18:02 PM PDT by mystery-ak (The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Technically, it wasn't in her face. While he faced her directly, it was in fact pointed at her right ear.
9 posted on 05/28/2003 7:18:03 PM PDT by Edmund
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
JFK was his hero? LOL....yes, JFK was democrat but unlike Clinton, he served his country in the military. The only two things Clinton and JFK had in common were adultry and the democratic party.
10 posted on 05/28/2003 7:18:35 PM PDT by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edmund
LOL...
11 posted on 05/28/2003 7:19:28 PM PDT by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
we should not know that his daughter flunked out of pre-med at stanford but went on to oxford, just because her father was president?
12 posted on 05/28/2003 7:19:54 PM PDT by liberalnot (what democrats fear the most is democracy .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
So, if a president were to be lavishing his friends with the funds of the Treasury, or stealing national treasures for his own personal decoration, or abusing his powers to aid a few friends, are we not supposed to question it when it happens if it appears suspicious but is done under the guise of "personal time with friends?"

-PJ

13 posted on 05/28/2003 7:22:42 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Yeah, The Peter Principle comes to mind. Unfortunately, clinton has taken that particular subject onto a different course.
14 posted on 05/28/2003 7:23:16 PM PDT by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Mommy, Mommy!

Please make the nasty man go away!

PUULLEEAASSSSSEEEEEEE!!

15 posted on 05/28/2003 7:24:29 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
''For a couple of months,'' he quipped, ''I was disoriented when I walked in a room and they didn't play a song anymore.

ROFLMAO - is he serious?

16 posted on 05/28/2003 7:30:38 PM PDT by republicandiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
The Oval Office of the White House is not a private place.

Some people have plausibly argued that clinton LIKED to live dangerously. Why else would he have committed a new felony or raised a new scandal at the rate of roughly once a week for eight years?

Right in the middle of the Lewinsky impeachment scandal he was photographed almost daily staring down some woman's cleavage in the receiving line.

That's not private life, that's public sleaze.
17 posted on 05/28/2003 7:31:41 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
When you have a strange women brought into a hotel room by state troopers and stick your penis in her face, it's not your private life. It's also an indication of serious mental instability which should disqualify you for the presidency.

Notice how the DemocRATS have not won the presidency with a known candidate since 1960 and 1964. It seems the only way they win the presidency is with dark horse candidates who have had little national scrutiny till the year they were elected president. Republicans on the other hand have uniformly run candidates who were well known nationally long before they won their party's nomination.

I doubt a future Clintonoid would get the kind of pass by the news media that Clinton got in 1992. There are many more ways for information to get disseminated now than there were just ten years ago. The New York Times and other "elite" leftist news outlets no longer have a stranglehold on information and the power to determine which stories get carried in other newspapers. If the Paula Jones story had broken while Clinton was just a governor running in the presidential primaries, he just might not have gotten the DemocRAT nomination.

18 posted on 05/28/2003 7:32:52 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
You might find this amusing...Clinton and Bush (GHW) were both among the dignitaries and pseudolebrities at the Indy 500 this year. The PA announcer stated there were two past presidents in the crowd, proceeded to briefly interview and joke with Bush, then ignored Clinton - never even mentioned his name. HMMM, wonder if they were worried he'd be booed?
19 posted on 05/28/2003 7:33:46 PM PDT by republicandiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I received this in an email today, and thought it was cute enough to share:

This is from a 1995 article from the British satirical magazine Private
Eye. It is the proposed Latin inscription on the wall of Oxford, lauding
Clinton’s achievements:


“Wilhelmus Jeffersonius Airplanus Clintonensis, salutamus venerabilis
Universitatis Oxoniensis. Quondam Rhodus scholasticus et marijuana
non-inhaliensis, et ex Bello Vietnamensis non conscriptione excusatus.
Subsequentis gubernator respublica Arkansensis et perpetrator criminalis
sleazissimus in nomine ‘Aqua Blanca” scandalus, cum tua uxore Hillarius
Roddama Clintesterone. Etiam legoverus multitudinus cum multae bimbones,
Gennifa Flores, Paula Jones, et cetera, et cetera. Satyriasis abnormalis
in modo Presidentius Kennedensis. Tua fama extendit per omne mundo pro
joggendo, juvando ad saxophonum, et non much else. Esperamus quid pro
quo multi richi Americani donabunt muchos dollares ad Universitatem
Oxoniensis.
20 posted on 05/28/2003 7:42:07 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson