[Stone Mountain]

IMO the slugs (lawyers) that get the guilty off should suffer the same fate as the victims.

If they are found not guilty, how would you determine that they were in fact guilty?

[DoughtyOne]

That's not an unreasonable question. Look, if Garagos truly thinks there's a cult out there, fine, he should provide the evidence of one. If he's just blowing smoke to create plausible deniability then he should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. I have no patience for attornies who lie publicly in the interest of defending their client. That should be a crime.

I am troubled by the lack of blood mentioned publicly, but after the prosecution presents their information I suspect that will be resolved.

Garagos has shown himself to be not much more than an ambulance chaser in the past. I doubt this time is any different.