Posted on 05/27/2003 3:49:55 PM PDT by Pharmboy
I've even speculated that they were the Xiongnu or perhaps the Scythians.
I dunno -- the term Scythians I look upon with extreme distrust -- it seems to be a generic term the Persians, Greeks and Romans used for 'barbarians to their north-east and seems to have included at various times Germanics, Slavs, Turkics and Indo-Irani groups. It seems to have been used as a generic term for 'barbarians'
"...the Yuezhi (Yüeh-chih in Wade-Giles), an Indo-European-speaking nomadic people who had relocated from China's present-day Gansu Province as a result of their earlier defeat by the Xiongnu."
There is the Gansu area and Indo-European speaking people again.
The Yue-chih or Tocharians are a very interesting group of people. Pity we don't know more about them. The thing that interests me is that we can broadly classify humanity into 3 races: Caucasoid, Negroid and Mongoloid. The Caucasoids are the most numerous --2.5 billion, the Mongoloids next with 1.5 billion and Afroids with 1 billion, the rest being mixtures of these three (of course, really speaking I'd say nearly ALL of us are mixtures, but the 1 billion are what you might call apparent mixtures like the South East Asians who are a Caucasoid-Mongoloid mix. if we look at genome diversity, the greatest diversity is shown amongst Negroids but the greatest color and feature difference is found amongst Caucasoids. Maybe it's because hte Caucasoids had a vast range of territory -- bordered by the Sahara and the Gobi-Siberian deserts
I think at one time, it included most of Asia too.
I read Eden In The East and he's about made a believer out of me.
VERY interesting! Thank you for keeping us in the loop!
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
Gods, Graves, Glyphs PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
That is no surprise. The Celtic (Gaullish) invasion of Asia Minor is well known, and biblical, too (The letter to the Galatians)
From your link: ‘Gene scientists claim to have found proof that the Welsh are the “true” Britons.’ As I ubderstand it, this is what everyone thought due to generally reported history, but after WWII some said that despite the evidence to the contrary the Brits were one people ethnically, Genetics has led back to the original idea — Anglo-Saxons pushed back much of the Britons into Wales.
This is possible, but not sure, since the Scotti moved to the islands in the Irish Sea, spreading until their new kingdom included parts of the western Scottish tereritory. Eventually the kingdom lost possession of the islands, and remained purely in Scotland. This transitional kingdom including the islands was called Dalriada, which has long seemed to me one of the loveliest names of any state in the British Islands.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.