Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sorenstam brings ratings to USA Network
USA Today ^ | 5/27/2003

Posted on 05/27/2003 8:46:55 AM PDT by TomB

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-298 next last
Some around here claimed this was going to be a "fiasco" for the PGA and the sponsor, Bank of America. We now see that isn't the case.
1 posted on 05/27/2003 8:46:55 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cedric; presidio9; discostu; an amused spectator; Ready4Freddy
BWHAAAHAAAAHAAAAAHAAAA!!!!
2 posted on 05/27/2003 8:49:03 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Gosh ratings were up almost a fifth even after Sorenstam got knocked out, BofA sure took a bath on that one... NOT.

Welcome to marketing 101 kids. Just wait until that 13 year-old that's already blowing it PGA distances off the tee shows up. If she can scrape up a so-so short game nothing is going to keep her out of the PGA.
3 posted on 05/27/2003 8:52:55 AM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Actually that's not true. The PGA is already considering making changes that would exclude females from playing in PGA events.
4 posted on 05/27/2003 8:57:45 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Really? Given the massive amount of money they made this weekend I find that hard to believe. Got a source?
5 posted on 05/27/2003 9:01:02 AM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I'll look for it. It was an article I read over the weekend. Apparently they've begun to consider making the PGA male only and there are I think three (or more) player reps involved.

The gist of the article was that while it's something they will address that no changes are made to the legal aspects of the PGA quickly.
6 posted on 05/27/2003 9:05:25 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomB
BWHAAAHAAAAHAAAAAHAAAA

Ummmm, didn't she LOSE?

7 posted on 05/27/2003 9:09:15 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I'm interested in that. We also have to consider who "they" is. Doesn't seem like the right decision given all the facts (higher ratings, great visibility, and a female on the horizon with a legitimate long ball). The PGA's claim is that it's for the best players overall. Now if it ever comes to pass (purely hypothetical here) that there's more than a handful of women that can compete at the level I can see a legitimate use for an MPGA, LPGA and PGA structure. But I don't see it happening anytime soon, the long ball is too important to PGA play.
8 posted on 05/27/2003 9:11:42 AM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
Ummmm, didn't she LOSE?

The question is how did the sponsor do? Some posters predicted a disaster for the PGA and B of A.

However, they did quite well.

9 posted on 05/27/2003 9:12:03 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Gosh that 1.9 rating was a real bonanza -NOT. More people were watching M.A.S.H. re-runs.


Look you were wrong. It happens. Deal with it.
10 posted on 05/27/2003 10:59:53 AM PDT by presidio9 (discostu is a jackass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
then they will have to rename it to the MPGA.....
11 posted on 05/27/2003 11:01:51 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Way to fail to read. 19% increase over last year. Regardless of the raw numer of 19% increase is great.

You're so cute when you can't even lie anymore.
12 posted on 05/27/2003 11:02:41 AM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cherry
Nah, they'll just keep it the same and change the qualification requirements.
13 posted on 05/27/2003 11:26:03 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Too bad she played so poorly that she didn't make the cut, CBS could have enjoyed some of the ratings for this circus.
14 posted on 05/27/2003 11:29:48 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I watched and enjoyed the show. If Anna hadn't been playing,
I wouldn't have given it a moment's eyeball time. I watched none of the tournament that played out on the weekend after she
missed the cut.
15 posted on 05/27/2003 12:26:02 PM PDT by gcruse (Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
CBS could have enjoyed some of the ratings for this circus.

Seems like they did.

    CBS' 2.5 overnight rating for its regularly scheduled three-hour show Saturday was 19% above last year's 2.1.

16 posted on 05/27/2003 5:51:40 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Look you were wrong. It happens. Deal with it.

If the ratings for Thursday were more than twice as high than for any other Thrusday telecast, how am I wrong?

The ratings were through the roof.

17 posted on 05/27/2003 5:54:50 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Right. It rained all weekend.
18 posted on 05/28/2003 6:13:48 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Because nobody watches Thursday and Friday golf. Which is why they broadcast it on cable.
19 posted on 05/28/2003 6:14:38 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: discostu
If she can scrape up a so-so short game nothing is going to keep her out of the PGA.

How about her inability to make any money there?

20 posted on 05/28/2003 6:18:28 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson