Posted on 05/26/2003 3:51:30 PM PDT by Lessismore
WASHINGTON: On a recent April afternoon in Silicon Valley, moments after he was told he had been laid off from his computer programming job at a Bank of America training centre, Kevin Flanagan stepped into the parking lot and shot himself dead.
Some of America's technology workers, who like Flanagan have also had to collect pink slips over the last several months, think they know why Flanagan took his life: Bank of America not only outsourced his job to India, but forced him to train Indian workers to do the job he had to give up.
In the weeks since his death, the techies have used the incident as fuel to fire a campaign against outsourcing to India, an issue that now seems poised to become a major sticking point between the two countries. Several US states are already considering legislation to ban or limit outsourcing.
Bank of America is one of several major US corporations General Electric, Microsoft, Intel are among others - under scrutiny for outsourcing jobs to India. The Bank created what is called a "Global Delivery centre" in 2000 to identify projects that could be sent offshore.
Since then it has signed agreements with Infosys and Tata Consulting Services (TCS) to provide solutions and services.
In an e-mail exchange with this correspondent, Kevin's father Tom Flanagan said "a significant reason for which my son took his life was indeed as a result of his job being outsourced."
"Did he blame India for his job loss? No. He blamed the "system." He couldn't understand why Americans are losing jobs. Rather I should say he understood it economically, but not emotionally," Flanagan said.
Bank officials, who did not return calls relating to Flanagan's death, have said in the past that the deal with Indian companies would effect no more than 5 per cent of the bank's 21,000 employees, or about 1,100 jobs, in its technology and operations division.
According to some surveys, the US has lost at least 800,000 jobs in the past year and some 3.3 million jobs will move overseas over the next few years because of outsourcing, mostly to India.
The Bank has also acknowledged that it had asked local workers to train foreigners because such knowledge transfer was essential. According to Tom Flanagan, his son was "totally disgusted" with the fact that he and his fellow-workers had to train foreigners to do his job so they could take over. "That sir is a travesty," he said in one e-mail.
US tech workers are challenging the corporate world's claim that it is outsourcing work to improve bottomlines and efficiency. Some analysts have also pointed out that US corporations were being forced to tighten up by the same people who are moaning about outsourcing, and who, heavily invested in the stock market, demand better performance.
But on one website that discussed the Flanagan case, a tech worker pointed out that data processing consumed only a small per cent of revenues and was hardly a drain on the Bank's profit.
"(It is) a prosperous bank which has let greed trump any sense of patriotism or social responsibility," he fumed.
Know what else burns my buttons?? THEY didnt even invent the technology that made us prosperous in the first place, nor did they invest in all the new machines or processes that took years and millions to develop!
And we just went over there, set up OUR machines, sent in OUR people to teach them how, they pay them slave wages compared to ours, put ourselves out of business all in the name of competition to wipe us out of the market!! we are selling them the rope to hang us, and we are making the rope ourselves!
And some here say we are whining?? As far as I am concerned, we are the only ones who are seeing this in the light that it is. My only guess is, the cheerleaders for this world economy are those who either never got laid off or havent yet because they entered the work force in such a unique field there is no present outsourcing yet.
The rest of us swallowed the line we were taught in the 1960's: That aviation was here to stay, that the US was the leader in manuacturing, that all these factories are here to stay because up her in CT we make jet engines, helicopters, and all the little mom and pop machine shops that make parts for Pratt and Hamilton and Kaman and Sikorsky will always be employed because there will always be newer jets and such, you live next to an international airport so you can always get a service job that pays well, move freight for Emery or TWA or whoever...
And none of that lasted past my 30th birthday, but that is what I was raised to believe, be trained to live under, direct my education towards...
And since then, due to such a rancid record of steady jobs de to all the temp jobs I had, I have never been able to get the BS, and have had 10 jobs in the last 3 years alone.
I cannot get a job washing dishes around here, did you know that? All the Mexicans are doing that. Not a joke, all the resturants hired Mexicans for $9 or $10, something I would really do if it meant a steady job long enough to get back into school and take a few more courses top get my BS, only, no one hires AS degreed engineers in CT anymore. There are too many BS degreed people looking for work, they dont need me.
Amen to that! Reading Hayek or better yet, applying his lessons. It seems amazing that as seemingly sophisticated a group as our IT workers would be so willing to embark on "The Road to Serfdom" by demanding greater government intervention.
The fact that it has become efficient, and is becoming more so, to conduct certain functions overseas remains both a challenge and an opportunity. Life presents us with many such paradoxes. What we choose to do when confronted with such a situation defines us as individuals, and collectively, will define us as a nation.
If that were to happen to some crooked fat head who runs some big corporation it would be all over the news and people would mourn like no tommorrow.
Where did you dream that up? I argue no such thing!
I want my country to stop giving away technology to people who didnt do anything to earn it and are only going to use it against us economically by putting us all out of work because they pay their workers slave wages or support their failing industries through govt subsidies instead of making these new companies COMPETE in the free market ike we are forced to!
That's because you were able to earn enough money while you didn't have to compete with these guys, to be able to "be happy to do it for the experience alone."
What about us who don't have that option? Like myself, unable to find a job in my field, and working for 10 bucks an hour at the best job I've been able to find, barely able to support my family?
Jerk.
I'm glad that DARPA is addressing this. It's pretty bad, but getting worse fast. We need to re-comit like we did after Sputnik was launched.
Maybe we need an "American West Lunar" company, like the old British and Dutch West India companies.
And I don't trust the Raytheon or Lockheed-Martin slowly dying behemoths to serve any purpose for revitalization, except only to spawn off -- completely -- a few key new technologies. One being the battlefield network integration stuff.
We have not only nearly kilt the golden goose in computers and electronics -- but in metal and chemicals too. (Excepting only drugs.)
No solace at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.