Skip to comments.
The Hillary strategy (and one of Bill's worst ideas)
Pittsburgh Tribune Review ^
| Sunday, May 25, 2003
| British journalist
Posted on 05/25/2003 4:27:49 AM PDT by Liz
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:03:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON - In all the terrorist attacks this month, either directly or indirectly, the United States has been a target. In Saudi Arabia, Morocco, and Israel, as well as in Iraq, Americans, if not the direct victims, are caught up in the carnage of the war on terrorism.
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dreamer; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Hillary Rodham Clinton, watching terrorism on television in the evenings with her campaign staff, knows .......
there are sufficient numbers of her husband's old staff in executive positions with President Bush to, at best, delay his responses and, at worst, tell him these are isolated instances that don't deserve his attention. Her Heinous'd better rethink that idiocy of hers........as if Bush would listen to leftover Clintonistas. Granted, there are too many stale Clinton worshippers embedded in the Bush administration -- who stand out like easy, mini-skirted sluts at a convention of virgins -- and who must be removed, pronto.
1
posted on
05/25/2003 4:27:49 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Liz
Mendacity, corruption, lust for power, and meretriciousness will always appeal to the vile, self-serving leaders of the Democrat Party, but they are up against the greatest statesman since Winston Churchill and the greatest American president since Abraham Lincoln.
George Bush could falter. He could make a mistake. If he should, the forces of evil will seize the opportunity; make no mistake about that. They are watching. They are waiting.
The forces of evil are blowing hard and powerful in the world today. Whether President Bush will ultimately triumph is part of a broader question: whether good will triumph over evil.
2
posted on
05/25/2003 4:48:35 AM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(Vote Democrat! Vote for national--and personal--suicide! It's like being a suicide bomber!)
To: Liz
The article paints an all-too-accurate picture of the Dims...and the Hildebeest. In a never-perfect world, there will always be deficiencies and inconsistencies that the left will jump on in order to try to tear down their opponents.
Instead of just spewing critical rhetoric ad nauseum, Hilliary should be made to pin point HER SOLUTIONS to the issues she brings up. Step by step outline just what she would propose to do differently. That oughtta shut her up.
Prairie
3
posted on
05/25/2003 5:03:29 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(The faintest of ink is better than the strongest of memories.)
To: prairiebreeze
a most excellent response....
4
posted on
05/25/2003 5:11:35 AM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
To: Liz
The thing not said and most won't say about the Queen of Homeland Security is how far will she go to lend a helping hand, word, or idea to any and all who would do us harm.
Homeland Security and its funding is what she has been working on since last election to unseat George W. Bush.
Sitting in the Senate is a demotion from her previous job and she is after her old job, no matter what.
To: Liz
bump for later reading, interesting............
To: prairiebreeze
The Dims - as well as the Buchanan types - are extremely well versed in sniping at anything that President Bush does. You are correct in that they NEVER say what it is that they would do differently (except raise our taxes again). When it comes to homeland security, The Ankle has no room to complain whatsoever. It was on her watch that the preparation for 911 took place.
I don't expect to see The Ankle running in 2004, as she is like any other common criminal: She would prefer to attack an unarmed victim, rather than the most effective leader the nation has had in generations.
7
posted on
05/25/2003 5:28:54 AM PDT
by
11B3
(We live in "interesting times". Indeed.)
To: Liz
Why hasn't he purged the government of these lice?
Why has he allowed agents Like Mary Jo White to obstruct and cover up the Clinton crimes?
Why aren't Bill n Hill in prison?
And Al Gore? Is there anyone who doesn't realize he tried a coup in the last election?
To: Just mythoughts
"Sitting in the Senate is a demotion from her previous job and she is after her old job, no matter what."
She's actually frightening because she probably is the only one out there that can contest Bush or be in a position of strength in 2008.
My question is one of character though. What was she doing all those years Billy, as Governor, and before, and as President, was having his flings? Did she learn to accept unacceptable behavior (obviously it never stopped) that was personally insulting and morally wrong? Or did she just come to an 'agreement' (sorta like a peace treaty) that allowed him to fool around as long as he kept it private, AND allowed her to do the same??? I wonder which paper is going to break the news about the real activities behind closed doors. Yes.... I do think there's a problem there, that carries over to her ability to govern.
This was over a period of more than 20 years. Would she now accept unacceptable actions against the USA from countries around the world the same way?
And how does miss lib feel about illegal immigrants anyway?
I don't like this lady at all - feel like writing a Dr Suess poem. *L*
9
posted on
05/25/2003 5:36:45 AM PDT
by
bart99
To: Liz
George Tenet is Bush's WEAKEST LINK!! He gave Bush the info that Saddam and his sons were in that building the first night of Shock and Awe and it seems like it was MIS-INFORMATION!!
If this is true that George Tenet is Clinton's FRIEND...we are ALL in trouble.
10
posted on
05/25/2003 5:38:09 AM PDT
by
Claire Voyant
((visualize whirled peas))
To: 11B3
(except raise our taxes again). Often, they aren't even forthcoming about that, although it is certainly always at the root of what they want. They must be pressed to admit when their lofty-sounding objectives really boil down to dependence on tax increases.
I don't expect to see The Ankle running in 2004,
Did you read Rush Limbaugh's latest observation about this? Basically he says that the only thing that might get in the way of Hitlery running in 2008, would be a Democratic victory (perish the thought!) in 2004. He also speculated that since the Clintons are running the Democratic party at this point in time, if any Democratic candidate seemed to be closing the gap on Bush and possibly might appear to win 2004, that the Clintons would step in behind-the-scenes and prevent it. ----Whoa!!
Prairie
11
posted on
05/25/2003 5:45:49 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(The faintest of ink is better than the strongest of memories.)
To: Liz; All
12
posted on
05/25/2003 5:46:22 AM PDT
by
backhoe
(The 1990's ? "The Decade of Fraud(s)..."( Oslo, dot-bombs, clintons...))
To: bart99
My "people radar" has always indicated to me that Hilliary ultimately only cares about Hillary. And Chelsea. Maybe Bill and her cronies. But genuinely nobody else, and CERTAINLY not the concept of what is good for the country.
I truly sense this from the woman. The thought of her being Commander In Chief is frightening and something I would work very hard against.
Prairie
13
posted on
05/25/2003 5:53:51 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(The faintest of ink is better than the strongest of memories.)
To: 11B3
But in the end it is all sniping with no actual solutions. On points on which Bush might be actually vulnerable, such as these oil connections, it does not appear that Hil and Bill have any actual solutions, only carping.
To: prairiebreeze
" The thought of her being Commander In Chief is frightening and something I would work very hard against. "
I agree................
I think if she were to really run for president, I would, for the first time in my life, become a very vocal and active political activist (is that redundant?), and wear out the soles of my shoes as necessary.
15
posted on
05/25/2003 6:13:09 AM PDT
by
bart99
To: prairiebreeze
Did you read Rush Limbaugh's latest observation about this? Basically he says that the only thing that might get in the way of Hitlery running in 2008, would be a Democratic victory (perish the thought!) in 2004. He also speculated that since the Clintons are running the Democratic party at this point in time, if any Democratic candidate seemed to be closing the gap on Bush and possibly might appear to win 2004, that the Clintons would step in behind-the-scenes and prevent it. ----Whoa!!I think Hitlery will make herself the RAT VP candidate in 2004, knowing the ticket will lose. She will gather the accolades for being the first female (?) candidate for such a high position. Her campaign will get far more coverage than any other candidate, all totally worshipful.
All of this will be useful for her 2008 campaign. She can claim that her presence as the VP candidate prevented a total RAT collapse. So she's a seasoned vote getter, has "gravitas", and is now ready to be the first female (?) president. The media will eat it up.
And if, by some fluke, the RATS acutally win in 2004, any "misfortune" to hit the president after January 21, 2005 will still allow Hitlery two full terms on her own. And by then, she, and we, won't have to worry about elections any more.
To: bart99
"I think if she were to really run for president, I would, for the first time in my life, become a very vocal and active political activist (is that redundant?), and wear out the soles of my shoes as necessary."
I'm sure there are many Americans who would shout "Amen!" to that statement.
17
posted on
05/25/2003 6:18:47 AM PDT
by
MaryFromMichigan
(Save the whales, collect the whole set......)
To: Tooters
Add my "A-MEN" to that.
To: bart99
"character", Dick Morris (whom I personally distrust), has been the only individual from the "inner" circle that speaks to this subject "character".
Brill's new book on 9/11, shinning a good light on Chuckie Shummer give a piece of the big picture on the "Queen" and how that everything is political to her.
There is little doubt that the Senate is in her charge, whatever action, and words that come from the majority of the minority in that body gets her approval first.
Money is politics life blood and the 'Queen' controls that.
There is one subject that Hillary does not hold back on and that is Homeland Security and its funding. She and her in-name-only hubby still court with the world leaders of socialism. This nation saw first hand how France, Germany, Russia, and China fought against us over Iraq, and this group has the same mind as Hillary.
There is still one other part of Hillary that she must "build a bridge" to, is her own lifestyle. The all out assult on words not spoken by Santorum regarding a "case", is being used to take away any fallout for her lifestyle choice and making that lifestyle a "civil right" without the "Queen's" directing the PC acceptance is a must.
Sid's new book, pushing the idea of an illegal impeachment and the "vast right wing conspiracy" which came out of her mouth first points to her character.
There is no group on this earth that the "Queen" hates more and desires to take out more, punish, remove and that group is the conservatives in this nation.
She should pay the ultimate political price alone for not voting for the recent "tax cut".
Another picture of her "character" is the manner in which conservatives that are nominated to the judiciary are treated. Talk about personal destruction in the political arena, this activity sums up all about her character.
The "Queen" wants back what she sees as hers and there is no other human, liberal or conservative will get in her way.
We all know what can happen to the "best laid plans" look at algore.
To: dennisw
look who will be implementing the roadmap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson