Skip to comments.
Blumenthal: Freeh 'Bears a Lot Of Responsibility' for 9/11 Attacks
NewsMax.com ^
| 5/24/03
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 05/25/2003 12:32:06 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: kattracks
LOL, The buck stops.... anywhere!.... but with the Clintons.
Scumbags tend to surround themselves with scumbags, and Blumenthal was a perfect fit with the Scumbag Administration.
To: InvisibleChurch
blumenthal is like a kid who hides behind his big brother (xxxlinton) and hassles other peopleExactly!
Is it any surprise the little mouse turned out to be a wife-beater?
To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Freeh of all the insiders KNOWS that Hitlary is NOT going to wait on the sidelines until 2008. Anyone who thinks that is a blind idiot. RUSH offered an interesting insight last week by speculating that Hitlary will not run in 2004 because it is unlikely that she could beat Bush. He stated that if a democrat did win against Bush, then Hillary wouldn't stand a chance in 2008 of defeating a second-term democrat. Therefore, according to RUSH, the Clintons will, in their under-handed, behind-the-scenes way, sabotage any Dem candidate for 2004.
Hlllary would then have a better chance of defeating an "unknown" republican candidate in 2008.
Sounds plausible for the slimes.
To: kattracks
"....no administration official was ever convicted or indicted for any crime involving campaign finance."Every time I hear one of these scumbags talk like this it reminds me of a line from the TV detective show: "You can't prove anything, Lieutenant Columbo."
To: KC_Conspirator
Sid represents all that was bad in the 90's and the pre-911 world.Worth repeating.
45
posted on
05/25/2003 11:38:18 PM PDT
by
JoeSixPack1
(POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
To: bjcintennessee
Yes, it would be plausible for any normal situation. However, Hillary is not normal..... The Clinton Cabal is a criminal organization. Rush - bless him - was wrong about her ability to win the Senate - first saying she would not run and then that she would not win. Wrong on both counts.
Understimating their evil must not be done.
Mr. Freeh, above all, should know not to do that. I think he does know it. Whether or not he has sufficient courage is the issue. God give him the strength to tell the truth.
To: JoeSixPack1
Please repeat it because I believe that its true. Superficility does not triumph over reality and serious. 911 proves that.
To: kattracks
bump
To: kattracks
If I recall Freeh was always publically respectful of Clinton and his henchmen. Sidney needs to take a long walk off a short pier.
To: Freedom'sWorthIt
The extortion phase has been used against Freeh. If he should perhaps show the kind of courage we have seen displayed by our President and by those in our military and by some in the investigative agencies who HAVE STOPPED additional terrorist attacks - Mr. Freeh could go down in history as the person who single handedly saved our country from the destruction of Clinton Hell Phase II. (Which will mean MANY more deaths than we experienced in Phase I). In fact, Mr. Freeh knows enough to know that at this moment, we can be certain, the Clinton / Terrorist connections are running and the planning is underway to torpedo both the economy (dramatically) no matter how many Americans will be killed or ruined - as long as it means Hitlery's rise to power in 2004.
Freeh of all of the insiders KNOWS that Hitlery is NOT going to wait on the sidelines until 2008. Anyone who thinks that is an blind idiot.
One can only hope that the courage we have seen displayed in many arenas since September 11th, 2001 will rub off on Mr. Freeh and/or some other insiders in Hitlery hell who will come forward at just the right time to just the right people to let America and the world know what danger we are in if any Democrat - but most especially Hillary Clinton - EVER takes total power again.
A timely bttt......Mr. Freeh testifies tomorrow before the 911 Omission.
50
posted on
04/12/2004 8:02:13 PM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: kattracks
And, if he was so incompetent, why didn't the clintons fire him? Freeh has so much dirt on Clinton, I'm surprised he's still among the living.
To: kattracks
"No," Blumenthal shot back. "He was never convicted of that. He was misleading but he was not convicted. It was a minor matter that happened in something involving sex." Yet another lie.
52
posted on
04/12/2004 8:15:00 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
To: flagbrigade
We can all thank Sid and all the Liar Lawyers who set up the firewall between the FBI and the CIA which prevented critical info from getting to those who could have prevented the Massacre of Sept llth. All in the name of privacy at the expense of our National Security. Which is exactly why they are all trying so desperately to blame the Bush administration for this. The voters must never know the truth about who dropped the ball allowing 911.
53
posted on
04/12/2004 8:18:19 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson