Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/24/2003 12:19:27 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
ping
2 posted on 05/24/2003 12:19:59 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; doug from upland
Scroll down to the 2nd article on the left titled Errors Plague Book By Right's Former Attack Dog

The pdf file won't open so I've linked to the html version.

3 posted on 05/24/2003 12:43:54 AM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I saw him on Hannity & Commie - Ol' SidViscious is so in denial...he was so pathetic it was almost funny.
5 posted on 05/24/2003 12:46:51 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (404 tagline not found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Useful idiot is far too harsh, and at least it's being done on radio to a conservative audience, but Sean is more or less giving Blumenthal an ongoing opportunity to set up Hitlery's upcoming book tour big time. Whereas the media shut down Gary Aldrich (at the Clinton White House's behest), Sid is becoming almost a regular, and getting the talking points out there each time.

It is a tough call because there is merit in exposing his BS. However, with Blumenthal's tome of lies and the Dallek trash JFK to help Beezelbubba campaign obviously laying the groundwork for Her Heinous's upcoming I Am Victim, Hear Me Whimper, the best thing to do would be to leave Sid in the sewer where he resides between appearances.

6 posted on 05/24/2003 1:14:24 AM PDT by Dahoser (Not that trashing a Kennedy is a bad thing in and of itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Hey Bill, rape anyone lately?
Hey Hill, kill anyone lately?
8 posted on 05/24/2003 3:29:10 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Blumenthal argued that Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick had been found to be not credible

Not Credible and not guilty are two different things. This is more legacy manufacturing by clinton.

9 posted on 05/24/2003 4:12:03 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
So good to see who follows in the fine tradition of Baghdad Bob.
11 posted on 05/24/2003 4:29:53 AM PDT by saveliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
This sort of thing really makes one wonder why Swamp Thing's publisher gave him a book deal...
15 posted on 05/24/2003 5:24:02 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Even with 30% off The Clinton Wars, Mr. Blumenthal's book should go unread and left to gather dust, the man has no credibility.

Bill Clinton was the worst president ever elected if indeed he were truly elected knowing now how the democratic election fraud has been perpetrated on the voters. And the notion that Hillary would make a good president is about as far fetched as electing Stalin for president of the US.

The new spin is that Mrs. Clinton is a Centrist. I believe her husband used that ploy in both his elections. Hillary is a radical, a socialist who is pushing her Third Way, a Marxist program. Bill is still dallying and Hillary is still raising taxes – both live the high life on taxpayers money – neither can call themselves Americans other than by accident of birth.

17 posted on 05/24/2003 5:36:04 AM PDT by yoe (Hillary is not a Centrist - never was; never will be.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
And while Blumenthal was careful to avoid calling the Arkansas businesswoman a liar...

You notice that the Clinton crowd will not call Anita Bodderick a liar because that will give her a "cause of action" for a libel (slander - whatever) suit. Clinton could be compelled to testify in such a suit - especially if he himself calls her a liar - and then a jury of more or less NORMAL PEOPLE (not the editorial board of the NYT) will get to decide whom they chose to believe.

So Clinton finds surrogates like Insidious Sid to make vague inferences that skirt the issue of libel without bringing the issue before a jury.

19 posted on 05/24/2003 6:14:01 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("ALL THE NEWS THAT FITS, WE PRINT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Hannity got Blumenthal on fox news. Hannity brought up law suit Blumethal had brought against, Matt Drudge for saying Blumenthal was an abusive husband. Blumenthal said Drudge had lied, it was a vicious attack. A right wing conspiracy.
Hannity then asked why Blumenthal had dropped the law suit and (paid Matt Drudge to drop the suit!? )
Funny how these Clinton liars are always stepping in their own dodo.
20 posted on 05/24/2003 8:23:38 AM PDT by OREALLY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; doug from upland
I wonder if Blumenthal has laid himself open to a lawsuit by Juanita Broaddrick. If so, this may be a way to get a court of law to conclude that, more probably then not, Clinton did rape her, despite the statute of limitations.
21 posted on 05/24/2003 8:30:50 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I was particularly amused by the part where Blumenidiot tried to convice Sean Hannity that there was indeed a vast right-wing conspiracy out to get President Clinton. And for "proof" he mentioned the 2.4 million dollar "Arkansas Project", Richard Mellon Scaife and some other guy's name that I've already forgotten.

2.4 million dollars and 2 people constitute a conspiracy ! ! !

I wonder what he considers the hundreds of millions of dollars that Unions spend every election cycle digging up dirt on Republican candidates? Oh, yeah...free speech.

22 posted on 05/24/2003 9:02:41 AM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Sid is doing pre-campaign work. He's trying to put to rest all the skeletons in the Clintons' closets. If there ever is a Hillary White House, he'll most definitely play a role. He's closer to her than he is to Bill, and will more than likely be involved in any White House campaign she runs.
23 posted on 05/24/2003 9:19:17 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Like Susan Estrich said in her article - Sid is just repeating stuff which needs to be buried.

And ... for once I tend to agree with Susan. Why are these people continuing to drag out this garbage ...?? Because, unless they do - there is nothing to keep the people engaged on x42 and his minions.

But ... the downside is - the more they bash the repubs, the more people are turned off by the dems. They're just so in love with themselves they think everybody else is too.
25 posted on 05/24/2003 10:39:42 AM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I have too drink a lot of tequila too spin as much as Cindy does. He lies more than all the Rats put together.
26 posted on 05/24/2003 10:46:39 AM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

still rapist in cheif


29 posted on 05/24/2003 7:32:01 PM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

This is just the kind of stuff that will haunt the crusty one and keep her from the highest office in the land


30 posted on 05/24/2003 7:35:05 PM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson