Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Votes Overwhelmingly to End Sanctions on Iraq
Reuters | 5/22/03

Posted on 05/22/2003 7:30:43 AM PDT by kattracks

May 22

— UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United Nations Security Council overwhelmingly approved on Thursday a U.S.-drafted resolution ending 13 years of crippling sanctions against Iraq.

The measure, adopted by a vote of 14-0 with Syria not participating, would give the United States and Britain -- as the victors in the U.S.-led war to oust Saddam Hussein -- broad powers to run Iraq and sell its oil to pay for reconstruction.

Britain and Spain co-sponsored the measure with the United States. Among those voting "Yes" were leading anti-war powers France, Germany, Russia and China. Syria said it was not given enough time to study the draft before the vote.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; china; france; germany; postwariraq; russia; sanctions; syria; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
I recently switched from cheap disposable Good News razors to the fancy Mach IIIs. Can't believe the difference. Recommended.

I've been using Mach IIIs for years. They're the best for sure.

21 posted on 05/22/2003 7:59:59 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win (Why can't we all just get a long-barreled handgun aboard the plane and fly safely?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Yes, they did.
22 posted on 05/22/2003 8:00:26 AM PDT by katana (Position: POTUS / MBA Required)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
oil futures prices already dropping on the news
23 posted on 05/22/2003 8:01:10 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
The Dow is up 75 now according to Yahoo on "mild optimism." Gee, don't think this could have anything do do with it, do you?
24 posted on 05/22/2003 8:04:50 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2timothy3.16
.........if you are used to the dull, scrape and hope french made bic's, you'll cut yourself using the much sharper US made Gillettes.

This is true only while you're learning to shave. After you master the art just the opposite will be true. In the meantime, stay away from all sharp instruments 'cause you sound like an accident about to happen ;-)

25 posted on 05/22/2003 8:05:27 AM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Big win on the tax cuts too. But you won't be hearing it characterized as a win by the media.

They are busy trying to connect the bomb at Yale Law School to the fact that Bush's daughter is a Yale undergrad.

26 posted on 05/22/2003 8:13:19 AM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2timothy3.16
As they say, if you want a cheap pen, buy a Bic...if you want a smooth, clean shave, buy a Gillette. :)

Note: The disposables are not the best shave in any brand (MHO).
27 posted on 05/22/2003 8:17:20 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Watch the headlines and in about 4-6 weeks you'll see articles appearing about oil agreements with Russia, new arms sales to this country and that, lower tarriffs on BMW's and VW's, military technology transfers to someone else... These UN guys don't give something for nothing. Bush has to buy them off somehow and it usually takes a month or so, just long enough for the average USA Today reader to not perceive the events as quid pro quo.

It's not the moral strength of Bush's position or the power we wield, or how good a negotiator he is: it's always the money...

Greg
28 posted on 05/22/2003 8:20:10 AM PDT by gregwest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Note: The disposables are not the best shave in any brand (MHO).

It all depends on what you're shaving.

29 posted on 05/22/2003 8:25:22 AM PDT by rabidralph (smoothie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Good, good. The U.N. is back to functioning correctly, as a debating society for tyrants and an arm of the State Department. (As the former I suspect it has in subtle ways promoted peace by providing thugs with an amusement other than going to war. As the later, it fulfils its only other point in existing.)
30 posted on 05/22/2003 8:37:00 AM PDT by The_Reader_David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gregwest
always the money...

Which we now control and the French don't. However you look at it, the French lost against Bush over the battle for control of Iraq's money. Bush won.

31 posted on 05/22/2003 8:44:17 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Gillette blades are much superior to Bic's. The fact is, however, that you are much more likely to beat up your face with the dull Bics than with the sharp Gillettes. At least that's my experience.

This is my experience as well. On the three occasions that I have tried BIC, I ended up looking like I had just walked away from a motorcycle accident! (nothing to do with anti-frogness either, I thought BIC was UK and Gillette was French)... My Mach III serves me quite well.

32 posted on 05/22/2003 8:51:10 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Good News razors

I guess that the same Good News that makes the garbage bags that break and spill its contents on the kitchen floor. Good News alright.

33 posted on 05/22/2003 8:51:12 AM PDT by oyez (Is this a great country or what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
It all depends on what you're shaving.

EWWWWWW!
34 posted on 05/22/2003 9:07:35 AM PDT by wasp69 (The time has come.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wasp69
EWWWWWW!

What do you mean by "ewwwww"?

35 posted on 05/22/2003 9:16:19 AM PDT by rabidralph (smoothie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump
36 posted on 05/22/2003 9:26:15 AM PDT by grumple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Buy a Norelco basic!
37 posted on 05/22/2003 11:06:11 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
UN Approves Resolution to Lift Iraq Sanctions 14-0

another Reuters article - Evelyn Leopold

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. Security Council voted overwhelmingly on Thursday to end 13-year-old sanctions on Iraq (news - web sites) and gave the United States and Britain extraordinary powers to run the country and its lucrative oil industry.

Despite misgivings by many council members, the 14-0 vote was a victory for the Bush administration, which made some last-minute concessions that opened the door to an independent, albeit limited U.N. role and the possibility of U.N. weapons inspectors returning to post-war Iraq.

The only opposition came from Syria, Iraq's neighbor and the sole Arab member of the 15-nation Security Council. Syria left its seat empty and did not cast a vote.

"The lifting of sanctions marks a momentous event for the people of Iraq," U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte told the council after the vote. "It is time for the Iraqi people to benefit from their natural resources."

And France, Germany, China, Russia and others who had opposed the U.S.-led war that ousted Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s government all voted "yes" but said the resolution was less than perfect.

"The war that we did not want, and the majority of the council did not want, has taken place," Germany's U.N. ambassador, Gunter Pleuger, told reporters. "

"We cannot undo history. We are now in a situation where we have to take action for the sake of the Iraqi people," Pleuger said.

Britain, a staunch U.S. supporter, made clear that unlike Washington, it wanted the return of U.N. arms inspectors.

Without U.N. action to lift the sanctions the United States would have been in a legal no man's land, with many firms unwilling to engage in trade with Iraq.

OIL FLOWS TO RESUME

Some 8.3 million barrels of Iraqi oil stored at the Turkish port of Ceyhan can now be exported. "The oil is ready to flow. The tanks are full," one council diplomat said. "I think you will find it will move quite quickly."

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) said he would name a special representative for Iraq shortly. The United States has signaled it prefers Sergio Vieira de Mello, currently the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.

"Whatever differences there have been in the recent past, we now have a new basis on which to work. And we must all work very hard, keeping the interests of Iraqis at the forefront of all our efforts," Annan told the Security Council.

The final compromise in the seven-page resolution was an agreement by Washington for a Security Council review within 12 months on the implementation of the resolution. But the measure does not need to be renewed and stays in effect until an internationally recognized Iraqi government is established.

French Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere said the resolution, while not "perfect," provided "a credible framework within which the international community will be able to lend support for the Iraqi people."

The U.N. sanctions were imposed after Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait. But after Saddam's fall, the United States argued there was no reason to continue the trade and financial embargoes.

The resolution would give the United States and Britain broad powers to run Iraq and sell its oil to fund reconstruction. It would also protect Iraq against lawsuits or attachments of its oil revenues until a permanent Iraqi government is established.

38 posted on 05/22/2003 11:06:24 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. Support FRee Republic ... Saving America .. One Village at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; ...
Good News !

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



39 posted on 05/22/2003 11:06:57 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Shermy; BOBTHENAILER
Thanks for the later update.

Shermy and Bob oil flow info in here.
40 posted on 05/22/2003 11:43:23 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Time to visit this website and join up: http://www.georgewbush.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson