Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Acres of Diamonds [A Celebration of the Capitalist Spirit]
Temple University ^ | Late 19th Century | Russell. H. Conwell

Posted on 05/22/2003 3:59:10 AM PDT by William McKinley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 05/22/2003 3:59:11 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: logos
Perhaps you will think this one a keeper as well.
2 posted on 05/22/2003 4:24:31 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Capitalist ping
3 posted on 05/22/2003 4:31:09 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Do you think universities today often are founded or run by men like this?
4 posted on 05/22/2003 4:49:01 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Owl bump (SCAT '82)
5 posted on 05/22/2003 5:27:51 AM PDT by vrwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
I do, I do; it is indeed a "keeper". Thanks for posting.

It is the ailment of the world, this idea that "greatness" lies "over there". I'm almost ashamed to say that it took me years to understand that wherever I find myself is precisely where God has something for me to do. Not over there, but here.

I would add to that the simple idea that if a person still draws breath in this world there is yet something for that person to do in God's plan that hasn't yet been done. If you're still here, IOW, there's something for you to do. That one I learned very young, however, indirectly from my great-grandmother.

She lived to be 96, and in her later years she suffered from goiter, blindness, and the impossibility of getting around by herself. I remember being in the living room one day, where "Grandma G" was always escorted to an easy chair early in the day and pretty much left there until bedtime, when I heard her say to herself, "Why am I still here, God? Why don't you take me home?" Only a few minutes later another and younger of her great-grandchildren came running into the room, saw "Grandma G" sitting there, walked over and climbed into her lap, and said, "Tell me one of your stories, Grandma!" Do I really need to say that her stories were always of her youth on the frontier, and were packed with history and wisdom? Grandma G still had something to do.

I don't know anything at all about "greatness," but I do know that whatever life has for me, it's right here.

Thanks again, W.M.

6 posted on 05/22/2003 5:33:58 AM PDT by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: logos
In addition to the defense of staying where the roots are, the thing that grabs me about this speech was how cleary and crisply he was able to put the accumulation of wealth in perspective with the Christian mindset. The passage about the love of money is priceless, in my opinion. For emphasis:
I remember, not many years ago, a young theological student who came into my office and said to me that he thought it was his duty to come in and "labor with me." I asked him what had happened, and he said: "I feel it is my duty to come in and speak to you, sir, and say that the Holy Scriptures declare that money is the root of all evil." I asked him where he found that saying, and he said he found it in the Bible. I asked him whether he had made a new Bible, and he said, no, he had not gotten a new Bible, that it was in the old Bible. "Well," I said, "if it is in my Bible, I never saw it. Will you please get the textbook and let me see it?"

He left the room and soon came stalking in with his Bible open, with all the bigoted pride of the narrow sectarian, who founds his creed on some misinterpretation of Scripture, and he puts the Bible down on the table before me and fairly squealed into my ear, "There it is. You can read it for yourself." I said to him, "Young man, you will learn, when you get a little older, that you cannot trust another denomination to read the Bible for you." I said, "Now, you belong to another denomination. Please read it to me, and remember that you are taught in a school where emphasis is exegesis." So he took the Bible and read it: "The love of money is the root of all evil." Then he had it right.

The Great Book has come back into the esteem and love of the people, and into the respect of the greatest minds of earth, and now you can quote it and rest your life and your death on it without more fear. So, when he quoted right from the Scriptures he quoted the truth. "The love of money is the root of all evil." Oh, that is it. It is the worship of the means instead of the end. Though you cannot reach the end without the means. When a man makes an idol of the money instead of the purposes for which it may be used, when he squeezes the dollar until the eagle squeals, then it is made the root of all evil. Think, if you only had the money, what you could do for your wife, your child, and for your home and your city. Think how soon you could endow the Temple College yonder if you only had the money and the disposition to give it; and yet, my friend, people say you and I should not spend the time getting rich. How inconsistent the whole thing is. We ought to be rich, because money has power.


7 posted on 05/22/2003 5:39:51 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
I knew the history of the "Acres of Diamonds" speech. But as with most histories, it was distorted. I thought the speech said that "Everyone can become rich." That is not its real message. It is that "Everyone has resources he does not know or recognize, but if he does recognize them, he can do better."

Thank you for posting this. It is a "keeper."

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, now up FR, "The Knight of Draper's Liquor Store."

8 posted on 05/22/2003 5:40:08 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logos
Argh. I put the bold one sentence too late. Apologies for spamming your 'my comments':
When a man makes an idol of the money instead of the purposes for which it may be used, when he squeezes the dollar until the eagle squeals, then it is made the root of all evil. Think, if you only had the money, what you could do for your wife, your child, and for your home and your city.

9 posted on 05/22/2003 5:42:02 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I think an amazing part of this speech is that there are so many great messages to take from it. You hit on one. Logos hit on another.

The one that hit most for me was the idea that the true and successful capitalist satisfies a need of man. When one finds and satisfies a need, one gets wealth that can be used for good. It is a double whammy. Good was done in satisfying the needs of others (God's will being done), and the tools for greater good are provided.

10 posted on 05/22/2003 5:44:57 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Bump
11 posted on 05/22/2003 5:46:53 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Bump right back your way.
Why, how wrong it is! Let the man who loves his flag and believes in American principles endeavor with all his soul to bring the capitalists and the laboring man together until they stand side by side, and arm in arm, and work for the common good of humanity.

He is an enemy to his country who sets capital against labor or labor against capital.


12 posted on 05/22/2003 5:48:25 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
I agree that his reference to money is important and valid, but I read it more as a metaphor for almost all human endeavors; that is, we almost always grant greater worth to the means than we do to the end. In fact, I think that propensity to consider the details, as it were, before the end product is what stops us from starting most projects.

When I was a bachelor I often allowed my home to, shall we say, become cluttered. (Ha!) So much so, that there would invariably come the day I knew I had to do something, but looking at what there was to be done, I would put it off again (and again), simply because I couldn't think of any good place to start the job. It took way too long for me to realize that what was important was the beginning; where to begin was totally irrelevant.

It's the details that kill us. How many so-called "art afficionados" spend their whole lives studying the brush strokes without ever seeing the painting? How many people waste their lives counting their dollars without ever realizing that money has no utility at all until it's spent? Yes, indeed, the love of money is the root of all evil; money itself comes in quite handy most days - at least for me. :)

13 posted on 05/22/2003 5:53:53 AM PDT by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: logos
Right, I don't read it differently.
14 posted on 05/22/2003 5:58:31 AM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Afternoon bump.
15 posted on 05/22/2003 3:45:27 PM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
In the late 1800s, the Golden Age of Capitalism. Acres of Diamonds is probably still being preached, but things have changed. Drastically.
16 posted on 05/22/2003 4:00:19 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
You think that the truths in here are no longer truths?
17 posted on 05/22/2003 4:11:27 PM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Truths are eternal when seen in certain lights. In those days the Age of Capitalism was running rampant and the diamonds and gold were actual diamonds and gold. Those days are gone. However, the ancient Arabian tales were allegories to be understood in many ways depending on the hearer and the times. They also read differently in translation. Everybody knows how many seeds are in the apple, but who knows how many apples are in the seed?
18 posted on 05/22/2003 4:27:47 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I can't agree with your perspective that when he was talking about diamonds and gold he was talking about diamonds and gold, since he gave examples of men building businesses selling bonnets, for example.

The acres of diamonds are to be found by examining what people desire, and by fulfilling needs.

19 posted on 05/22/2003 4:31:57 PM PDT by William McKinley (Our differences are politics. Our agreements are principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Sure, he went on to give a lot of examples of his take on the old story. He wasn't talking about literal diamonds and gold. However, in those days it was the peak of capitalism and others did talk of literal diamonds and gold. Not that you would find diamonds in your garden, but that you could become financially rich beyond the dreams of avarice, become one of the captains of industry, right here in the Land of Opportunity. For a while it looked like they could transform the city of man to the city of God in their own times. Lots of optimism. Then the 20th century came along and we aren't real pleased with the results. So we are back to the more spiritual interpretations. But for a while they were talking about real shiny material stuff. Horatio Alger.
20 posted on 05/22/2003 4:42:32 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson