Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mr. Horowitz Owes Christians an Apology; Latest conservative to go pro-'gay'
Culture and Family Institute ^ | 5/21/2003 | Robert H. Knight

Posted on 05/21/2003 2:40:44 PM PDT by Polycarp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last
Previous Thread: Pride Before The Fall (Horowitz Sticks it to the Fundies!)
1 posted on 05/21/2003 2:40:45 PM PDT by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; aposiopetic; Aquinasfan; ...
ping
2 posted on 05/21/2003 2:41:46 PM PDT by Polycarp (the homo issue could be the albatross that "Read my lips" was for Bush's papa -- CKCA'ers, UNITE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Jesus did not mention homosexuality specifically in the four Gospels.

You might say the same thing about slavery.

3 posted on 05/21/2003 2:45:31 PM PDT by boothead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boothead
bump that one.
4 posted on 05/21/2003 2:52:51 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Horowitz isn't the apologizing type. Ah..I'm getting used to the non-religious conservatives going pro-gay. They're all doing it. I stopped donating to Horowitz when he called Falwell an expletive over the gay issue a while back. He's good on some issues, but he's still a big-time liberal on other issues.
5 posted on 05/21/2003 2:53:02 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
...Jesus was not recorded in the New Testament speaking directly about incest or child pornography, either. Does that make them okay? ...

But he does state something along the lines of "but if you chould harm just one hair on the head of these children"
6 posted on 05/21/2003 2:53:46 PM PDT by rontorr (It's only my opinion, but I am RIGHT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Is Horowitz a friend of Bill, too - Salon Newsreal | The mysteries of Bill Clinton "My only enemy is right-wing religious fundamentalism."

FrontPage magazine.com i'm a heterosexual man who believes that most gays are homosexual by nature.

Horowitz has become victimized by the propaganda he so often rails against.

  1. The Three Myths About Homosexuality
  2. Selling Homosexuality To America
  3. Gay Rights Strategies Involve Conscious Deception And Wholesale Manipulation of Public Opinion

Horowitz should read his own mag - The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror

7 posted on 05/21/2003 2:57:19 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Horowitz was way, way off.

And as other posters have pointed out, his endorsement of sodomy is not offensive only to fundamentalist Christians, but also to devout Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians, Orthodox Jews, Mormons, etc.

To appease a tiny segment of sodomites and their snooty "more cultured than thou" followers, he's antagonizing his base of supporters.

8 posted on 05/21/2003 2:59:00 PM PDT by wideawake (Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
bump
9 posted on 05/21/2003 2:59:56 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
bump
10 posted on 05/21/2003 3:01:25 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
If the “real issue here is tolerance of differences in a pluralistic society,” then Mr. Horowitz should oppose the “gay rights” movement with his whole being.
What does the author mean by "gay rights"? Does that involve the right not to be thrown in jail or fined for being gay?
11 posted on 05/21/2003 3:02:11 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rontorr
The argument from omission is incredibly weak.

The fact is that Jesus was an observant Jew who condemned sexual immorality.

What did a first century Jew mean by porneia or sexual immorality?

Any sexual conduct outside of a traditional marriage between a man and a woman.

To suggest anything else is to ignore history, context and common sense.

12 posted on 05/21/2003 3:02:11 PM PDT by wideawake (Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
From Mr. Horowitz to me:

What gives you the authority to speak for Jesus? Rape and Child molestation are injuries to others; of course they're sins. But homosexual sex? Adultery is a sin too. But I didn't Bauer & Co. calling on the RNC chaiman to shun adulterers. As for Communists, they expelled homosexuals from the Party. Also you might look at my articles on AIDS (there are several) and the Boy Scouts to see if I've reverted politically. A little humility on your part is in order here, since I am the author of one of the earliest articles (1983) laying the blame for the AIDS epidemic on gay leaders and have devoted a chapter of my book The Politics of Bad Faith to what I have called "A Radical Holocaust." You assume that homosexuality is choice. There is no evidence for this. The conversion movement has miserably failed to make significant percentages of the homosexuals they treat, normal.

13 posted on 05/21/2003 3:03:59 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Although Horowitz may have embraced the secular jewish stance on homosexuality and as such is a political enemy on this issue, it may have been a mistake to jump all over Racicot for this. I know a state senator at my church who had a "meeting" with some gay and lesbian task-force types. I have no doubt that his stance on their agenda is the same as mine. The meeting ended with the gay guy crying and the lesbians hopping mad and needing to be escorted from his office.
14 posted on 05/21/2003 3:06:20 PM PDT by Abe Froman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Horowitz is fun to have around as he is willing to say things that others think, but won't themselves say.

That said, he's kind of a nut... and he's certainly not a leader that I would ever consider following. Since God made and owns this world and all in it, I'll stick to following those he has anointed.

15 posted on 05/21/2003 3:07:14 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: boothead
  1. SODOMY : Texas Phys.Resource Council, Christian Med. & Dental Association, Catholic Med.Association Sodomy is an efficient method of transmitting STDs. And regardless of the reason, same-sex sodomy is far more effective in spreading STDs than opposite-sex sodomy. Multiple studies have estimated that 40 percent or more of men who practice anal sex acquire STDs. In fact, same-sex sodomy has resulted in the transformation of diseases previously transmitted only through fecally contaminated food and water into sexually caused diseases primarily among those who practice same-sex sodomy.
  2. SODOMY : CENTER FOR THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE CONSTITUTION (LAWRENCE v. TEXAS SODOMY BRIEF)
  3. SODOMY: Brief Of The States Of Alabama, South Carolina, And Utah (S.C.O.T.U.S.& Sodomy)
  4. Lawrence V. Texas, Brief Of The States Of Alabama, South Carolina, And Utah (S.C.O.T.U.S.& Sodomy)

 

16 posted on 05/21/2003 3:12:05 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I totally agree, point well made
17 posted on 05/21/2003 3:14:35 PM PDT by rontorr (It's only my opinion, but I am RIGHT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lelio
What does the author mean by "gay rights"? Does that involve the right not to be thrown in jail or fined for being gay?

That's the problem. Although there have always been sodomy laws on the books, they were never enforced as long as homosexuals were discrete about it. I doubt whether any Freepers want the police to go around arresting people just because they are homosexuals.

But the gay rights groups have made use of people's willingness to be tolerant and gone way too far the other way. Basically they are agitating for special rights for gays. They are agitating to have young schoolchildren taught that sodomy is good. They are agitating to force people to hire gays. They are pushing for gay scout leaders. And the end of the line, toward which they have been working for many years, is to legitimize man-boy sex.

There is a reasonable line between extremes. The real bigots today are the gay groups, who want unlimited rights to do whatever they want and to penalize anyone who objects.

18 posted on 05/21/2003 3:15:22 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Jesus broke bread with prostitutes, tax gatherers, adulterers, liars, backsliders and at least one traitor (Judas). Does that mean he was endorsing these activities?
19 posted on 05/21/2003 3:16:15 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
POST #16.
20 posted on 05/21/2003 3:17:01 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson