Skip to comments.
Hollywood Furious with Deck of Weasels
The Left Coast Report, via email
| 5-20-03
| James Hirsen
Posted on 05/21/2003 8:37:53 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
NewsMax is already hearing that several Hollywood stars are just furious with our latest "Deck of Weasels" -- our playing and information cards that expose the anti Americanism of the political world and Hollywood.
One mega star's producer told us late last week that "Everyone is talking about it, and a lot of people are worried."
Worried about what?
Well, the crazed liberals that make up Tinseltown's elite thought the "Bush war" against Iraq was truly going to be a disaster -- and that they would be vindicated.
Sorry, Charlie, it didn't work out that way, did it?
Now the Hollywood libs were hoping that their anti American fervor would evaporate into recent memory. That was until the Deck of Weasels hit late last week.
The 55 playing cards not only depict the angry Hollywood establishment -- with the likes of Ed Asner, George Clooney, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins and others -- but reveals their most outrageous quotes.
Some are thinking that certain big box office stars may soon be going the way of the Dixie Chicks.
Well, let's help them! Check out NewsMax's new Deck of Weasels... get them and pass them around to your friends and family. They are fun and informative.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bwahahahahahaha; deckofcards; hollyweird; hollywood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: martin_fierro
They card manufactureres should be take care that the Screen Actors' Guild doesn't try to shut them down. All they card are be long to us. ;O)
41
posted on
05/21/2003 9:24:27 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(We learn by trail and errror. :-)
To: mr.pink
>>It is funny, but let's just keep our sense of humor when the leftists inevitably come out with their own deck of cards.
<<
They may try some weak, insipid comeback, but it will fall flat, as it is nothing more than their anti-American horsepoop that is quite unpopular at the moment.
42
posted on
05/21/2003 9:24:37 AM PDT
by
SerpentDove
(Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
To: Paul Atreides
In the last hour I got a call from MCI asking for my business. I told the gal that when the President of MCI publically gets down on his knees and apologizes for employing Danny Glover as spokesman, then I might consider doing business with them...and not before!
She said we are hearing a lot of comments like yours!
43
posted on
05/21/2003 9:24:47 AM PDT
by
Voltage
To: Paul Atreides
What, no Peter Jennings?!!!
To: biblewonk
This is priceless (ping)!
45
posted on
05/21/2003 9:27:23 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Even if my special interest is better than yours, they're both unconstitutional.)
To: SerpentDove
To: new cruelty
I wonder if Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon would disagree?
47
posted on
05/21/2003 9:31:02 AM PDT
by
SerpentDove
(Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
To: SerpentDove
They should. penn, sheen, robbins, and sarandon all love the attention. The thought of no one talking about them or their antics would truly infuriate them.
To: Thud
I think you will really like the political theater of this one.
To: Paul Atreides
Where's Danny Glover in there I wonder?
To: BrooklynGOP
It's 21. ;^)
"So if you devise a point system you can figure out the computer's next action..."
Multi-player doesn't have this problem, but a computer that plays and bets strictly according to the rules won't be much of a challenge. Hold 'em is a game of betting tactics and strategy - the cards are a means only. ;^)
In my experience, betting figures larger than probability in determining who wins - both hand by hand, and over the course of a session.
Good luck!
To: headsonpikes
but a computer that plays and bets strictly according to the rules won't be much of a challeng Ofcourse I over simplified :) Certainly some things could be done a little randomly. I could make the computer remember how the human player plays certain hands. So some hands the pc will play based on strict rules and others based on player's history.. There're probably other ways to vary the computer's behavior. Nothing compares with a human opponent ofcourse (that's why I am writing multi player first).
To: Prodigal Son
Where's Danny Glover in there I wonder?That's the card that always gets shite canned first.
53
posted on
05/21/2003 10:22:49 AM PDT
by
husky ed
(FOX NEWS ALERT "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead" THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT)
To: Paul Atreides
bump
To: Paul Atreides
Sorry, Charlie, it didn't work out that way, did it?"That's Mr. Sheen to you!"
55
posted on
05/21/2003 10:28:24 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: BrooklynGOP
I'd be interested in finding out how it goes when you're done.
I'm a sucker for poker stories. ;^)
To: Paul Atreides
Yes, it is wonderful! These people should be embarrassed! PABAAH is putting together a new t-shirt featuring a top ten most un-wanted with a listing of celebs and their quotes...
Don't Tread On America!
To: Paul Atreides
I gotta get me a deck, tee hee!
58
posted on
05/21/2003 10:34:35 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: Paul Atreides
bttt
59
posted on
05/21/2003 10:35:25 AM PDT
by
cgk
(It is liberal dogma that human life is an accident - Linda Bowles (r.i.p.))
To: Paul Atreides
Helen Thomas, alright! Her perfidy is worthy of a face card.
60
posted on
05/21/2003 10:36:20 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson