Skip to comments.
New Yorker Finds Fox News Biased
IMDB.com ^
| 5-20-03
Posted on 05/20/2003 6:03:53 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
In advance of the May 26 publication of an article by New Yorker media writer Ken Auletta about Fox News Channel, the magazine on Monday released an interview with Auletta in which he cites recent research indicating that while CNN and Fox both attract about the same percentage of conservative viewers, Fox viewers stay tuned 70 percent longer than CNN viewers do and thereby account for the network's ratings success. Moreover, Auletta indicates, because Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes is regarded as an administration ally, he has enjoyed unprecedented government access -- something that may have helped Geraldo Rivera during the recent Iraq war. Auletta says that after the Pentagon yanked Rivera from his "embedded" position with U.S. troops for his infamous sand drawing, "Ailes called friends in the Bush administration" and Rivera was able to return to his position. Thus, "Geraldo and Fox were spared major embarrassment."
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foxnews; kenauletta; mediabias
Yaaaaaaawwwwwwnnnnnn!
To: Paul Atreides
I find the New Yorker biased!
They probably will apologize to me by morning.
2
posted on
05/20/2003 6:06:52 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
To: Paul Atreides
The New Yorker got all the best ord'oeurvres at clinton's cocktail parties, and plenty of chilled chardonnay. Now their noses are out of joint.
3
posted on
05/20/2003 6:09:53 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Paul Atreides
Since when are these a**holes concerned about bias?
4
posted on
05/20/2003 6:14:29 PM PDT
by
rimmont
To: Paul Atreides
"Fox viewers stay tuned 70 percent longer than CNN viewers do and thereby account for the network's ratings success." And in the end, when all is said and done, this is all that matters. Money talk$ and BS walk$. Auletta's "views" don't matter because he doesn't matter.
To: Paul Atreides
The New Yorker? Isn't that where the NYT cast offs go? You know, the ones who can't lie as well?
To: McGavin999
The libs are all in a snit because all of the untouchables in flyover country now have a voice. The market decides that talk radio is successful, so it must be due to something evil in the air. The market decides that Fox is successful, so it must be due to something evil in the air. The market is able to get their news on the Internet, rather than four network socialists, so it must be due to something evil in the air.
Ah, the loss of liberal power is a lovely thing.
To: Paul Atreides
I'm getting a good laugh out of this -- I have (long ago) cancelled both New Yorker and CNN subscriptions, and phoned my local cable co. (more than once) to demand FNC, before they added it to their lineup.
8
posted on
05/20/2003 6:34:04 PM PDT
by
Ed_in_NJ
To: Paul Atreides
Ken Auletta: The reincarnation of Truman Capote.
9
posted on
05/20/2003 6:37:20 PM PDT
by
gaspar
(`)
To: Paul Atreides
There's a reason why nobody knows Ken Auletta......
10
posted on
05/20/2003 6:42:03 PM PDT
by
Doctor Raoul
(The "Anti-War Leaders" Have Blood On Their Hands, look and you'll find, they are NOT anti-war)
To: Doctor Raoul
There's a reason why nobody knows Ken Auletta......Was it Ken Auletta that I heard say that Fox News has an unfair number of conservatives on their panels? The usual three liberals and one conservative on the alphabet channels must be his idea of "fair."
To: Paul Atreides
I like it. If liberals want to play the objectivity game, we can play. Bring it on.
To: Paul Atreides
Liberals are especially deceitful when discussing media bias. They insist on discussing FoxNews despite the fact that it reaches less than 1/20th the audience of network news. That's 5%!! It's an anomaly, a spit in the ocen- compared to the liberal bias that pervades network news, the newspapers, and magazines. It's an attempt to argue by exception, intellectual dishonesty that is towering even for them.
To: jagrmeister
What is truly bizarre is, at first, the left was saying that there is absolutely, positively, without a doubt, no liberal bias in the media. Then, along comes Albore, Obubba Been Laiden, and Her Thighness saying that there is a bias in the media, only that it is a right wing bias! That's right. ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and especially FNC all tilt to the conservative point of view. Their whole worldview turns on a dime. First, President Bush was too stupid to even put on his socks in the morning. The next day, he was this brilliant mastermind who is ready to take over the world. The spirit of Doublethink and Doublespeak is alive and well in the world of liberalism.
To: Ed_in_NJ
I have (long ago) cancelled both New Yorker and CNN subscriptions, and phoned my local cable co. (more than once) to demand FNC, before they added it to their lineup. That is one little tidbit they forgot to mention. In many areas Fox is not available but CNN is a staple with all cable subscriptions.
15
posted on
05/20/2003 8:11:55 PM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
To: Paul Atreides
Moreover, Auletta indicates, because Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes is regarded as an administration ally, he has enjoyed unprecedented government access...yeah, but he hasn't had to conceal and suppress news of assassinations, torture, and systematic murder to maintain his access the way CNN did to keep their in with Saddam......
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson