[scripter]

I did read the book and I'm afraid you're the one who's being disingenuous and/or disagreeable. The book summary was written by someone who is obviously as vituperatively opposed to treating gays with any kind of dignity as you are. Her summations are, how to say it, a bit propagandistic.

Is there no end to your obfuscation and misdirection? Tell me, does the link accurately represent what was said in the book, yes or no. Is there anything out of context, yes or no? You'll probably respond with more obfuscation. But whatever it takes, the ends justify the means in your case.

[tdadams]

Tell me, does the link accurately represent what was said in the book, yes or no

I can't say for sure, I haven't read the book. Have you? But call me crazy, something about the vocabulary of her summary leads me to believe that she's sensationalizing the book a bit.