I can't say for sure, I haven't read the book. Have you? But call me crazy, something about the vocabulary of her summary leads me to believe that she's sensationalizing the book a bit.
You said in post post 437
I did read the book...So which is it?
But call me crazy, something about the vocabulary of her summary leads me to believe that she's sensationalizing the book a bit.
Something about the results of a search on this book tell me the author is accurately representing the book. And I just ordered a copy from Bolerium Books. I collect similar books so I can demonstrate folks like yourself make statements without any supporting evidence.
You also said
Her summations are, how to say it, a bit propagandistic.So now we see you have nothing to base that on. You haven't read the book so you just make it up as you go.