Disingenuous at best. Jesus didn't mention a lot of sins. Paul, however, does mention homosexuality specifically, several times, turning Horowitz's implication into an outright lie.
If homosexuals simply wanted toleration, there would be no homosexual movement. The same laws against murder, assault, and harrassment are equally applied to protect them the same as anyone else. Most of the thirty percent of homosexuals who vote republican know this or they would be democrats.
This is another case of less than perfect honesty from Horowitz. The homosexuals he is defending are not being attacked by Christians, they are creating a legal framework to ram their lifestyle down the throats of Christians.
If Horowitz wants to defend tolerance, he needs to be preaching to the homosexuals rather than the Christians.
I guess we can just infer that opposition to gang rape is merely a personal interpretation and that reasonable people can just split the difference?
Horowitz seems to be reverting to leftist "logic" in debating this point.
Exactly what I was thinking. As much as I liked Horowitz, he is wrong on this issue. He needs to be aware of all the indoctrination going on in the public schools (TO CHILDREN) in the name of "tolerance"...it is sickening and the social engineering has to end.