Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/20/2003 5:42:05 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Once there is a World Government, I'll become a Rebel. I know how to fight and I know how to hide.
2 posted on 05/20/2003 5:47:42 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If you're looking for a friend, get a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
LOL. In their dreams.
5 posted on 05/20/2003 5:52:58 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
This is exactly what Dems call for in every speech. Clinton and Kerry, most recently.
9 posted on 05/20/2003 5:55:03 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
The grand view of the Wilsonian World Federation. The Marxist brand of socialism, by now largely discredited, was the driving force for forty years behind the actions of the United Nations. The US foolishly persisted in believing in the rhetoric, that the UN was the "Parliament of Man", that is, those US citizens who believed in the basic goodness of the human heart everywhere. But alas, shining principles, no matter how presented, are useless if never applied. Most of the governments that represent the member nations have no concept of extending popular representation to their own people, because that would almost certainly doom them to loss of control, either through anarchy, or by overthrow. The eventual outcome is that the directives issued by the UN only apply to the US and a few other nations, while the rest cynically ignore them, knowing that there is not a whole lot that the UN could do to enforce the directives, without the active participation of the US.
11 posted on 05/20/2003 5:55:55 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
What, no Prime Directive?
16 posted on 05/20/2003 6:00:23 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
AND.......according to the lastest rumor....What UN position has clinton applied for???????
19 posted on 05/20/2003 6:03:53 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Just to remind everyone of where we stand.

Eliminating the veto and permanent member status in the Security Council;

Not yet implemented but being pushed by several nations.

Authorizing global taxation on currency exchange and use of the "global commons;"

This has not yet gone through but has been openly advocated by Kofui and several Dems in the USA. WJC had talked about this as a reasonable alternative to provide funds for the UN.

Creating an International Criminal Court; Done.

Creating a standing army under the command of the secretary-general;

Proposed but not yet implemented Several nations have already given promises of troops for such an Army including but not limited to Canada, Ireland, Lybia, India, and China.

Creating a new Economic Security Council;

Not yet formally implemented but the G8 meetings may [erform this function sufficiently.

Creating a new People's Assembly;

They have the list of NGO's to make up this assembly and have used these NGO's to staff numerous conferences etc. but this is not yet formally implemented.

Regulating multinational corporations;Many proposals but done by separate treaty.

Regulating the global commons;

The seabed treaties are the attempt to do this.

Controlling the manufacture, sale and distribution of all firearms.They are clearly working on this and have succeeded in the majority of nations.

20 posted on 05/20/2003 6:05:25 AM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!

21 posted on 05/20/2003 6:05:34 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
By the time our grandchildren are our age, this will not be the amusing joke it is today.
22 posted on 05/20/2003 6:09:20 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Let's get some guts...........WITHDRAW NOW!!!! If they want a fight let 'em come and get some. I will die before I give up my freedom and liberty. The spirit of William Wallace LIVES!
25 posted on 05/20/2003 6:13:17 AM PDT by StoneColdTaxHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
bttt
26 posted on 05/20/2003 6:14:55 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
As Thomas Jefferson so aptly put it:

"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
36 posted on 05/20/2003 6:26:50 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
I would never submit to being governed by that farce of an organization and its morally bankrupt and idiotic leaders. When this nation disappears under their umbrella, the last good hope of Freedom and liberty in this world will disappear forever.

As to what actions I would take to prevent that from happening and to maintain my freedom, I guess I would have to consider the course of action when it confronts me. Even if I am old when it comes, I can use my mind or whatever asset is available to pursue freedom.


They can cram their agenda in the proper receptacle.

54 posted on 05/20/2003 6:49:17 AM PDT by judicial meanz (Audaces Fortuna Juvat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Bump.
59 posted on 05/20/2003 6:59:52 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (You say Muss-lim, I say Moose-limb; Let's call the whole thing off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
SPOTREP
69 posted on 05/20/2003 7:56:01 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!; Flurry; smith288; StoneColdTaxHater; ought-six; judicial meanz; ...
As long as we in the US civilian population have large numbers of weapons and care about our freedom, none of this will ever take place. The key to our freedom is within our own borders and, more to the point, within our own hearts. This fact was recognized over 150 years ago by a then-future US President:

At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth in their military chests; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in the trial of a thousand years.

At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we ourselves must be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.

Abraham Lincoln

January 27, 1838

76 posted on 05/20/2003 8:30:54 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Like so many other posts I've read on this thread, I'd rather die free than live as a slave. When the time comes, I'll fight.
77 posted on 05/20/2003 8:59:04 AM PDT by appalachian_dweller (Those who sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
>>Thus, in their speeches to the U.N.'s Millennium Assembly in 2000, both Secretary General Kofi Annan and President Bill Clinton made reference to this new concept, saying national sovereignty can no longer be used as an excuse to prevent the intervention by the U.N. to provide "security" for people inside national boundaries <<

Bill Clinton has his eye on Koffi Annan's job. I shudder at the thought of Bill at the head of the U.N. (and leader of the globe) and Hitlery as President of the U.S.

The purpose is to level out the wealth--spread ours to the poor world, allow free migration into America...it's hideous.





78 posted on 05/20/2003 9:01:45 AM PDT by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
>>Thus, in their speeches to the U.N.'s Millennium Assembly in 2000, both Secretary General Kofi Annan and President Bill Clinton made reference to this new concept, saying national sovereignty can no longer be used as an excuse to prevent the intervention by the U.N. to provide "security" for people inside national boundaries <<

Bill Clinton has his eye on Koffi Annan's job. I shudder at the thought of Bill at the head of the U.N. (and leader of the globe) and Hitlery as President of the U.S.

The purpose is to level out the wealth--spread ours to the poor world, allow free migration into America...it's hideous.





79 posted on 05/20/2003 9:01:45 AM PDT by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
bump
86 posted on 05/20/2003 9:35:22 AM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson