Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Preparing for Nuclear Attacks on U.S, Britain
newsmax.com ^ | Sunday, May 18, 2003 | newsmax.com

Posted on 05/18/2003 6:19:16 PM PDT by paltz

Russia will "launch" a mock nuclear attack against the U.S. and Britain during military exercises over the next week.

Moscow's Nezavisimaya Gazeta reports that Russia's strategic bombers and nuclear submarines "will deliver hypothetical nuclear strikes on the U.S. and Britain, while locating and destroying aircraft-carrier groups of the U.S. Navy."

The massive air, sea and land maneuvers are being conducted in the wake of America's stunning victory over Iraq, a longtime client state of Russia.

If the mock strikes were real, they would kill 125 million Americans in the first three days of such an attack, with tens of millions more casualties in the weeks after.

The paper said the exercises are taking place because "Russian military leaders have learned a lesson from the Iraq war, and intend to show the U.S. and its allies their determination to repel any potential threat coming from the West."

The Russian military, in plans drawn up at the request of President Vladimir Putin, argues that the only way Russia can deal with an escalating regional conflict with the U.S. would be to employ nuclear weapons.

Though Russia's military has been considerably downsized since the end of the Cold War and its conventional forces hold little weight against a modern equipped army, Russia has continued to invest heavily in strategic and tactical nuclear weapons.

Sometime during the '90s, Russia attained nuclear superiority over the U.S. While Russia's large strategic nuclear weapons have remained in parity with the those of the U.S., Russia's tactical nuclear arsenal has been estimated to include 20,000 to 40,000 weapons.

At the same time Russia has continued its nuclear buildup, the U.S. has virtually destroyed its arsenal of tactical nuclear warheads. Under orders from the Bush administration, the U.S. also has been moving to further reduce the U.S. strategic arsenal. Currently, the nation's most modern fleet of ICBM, the MX missiles, is being destroyed.

The Russian military exercises show a desire by the Russian military to deal with the huge technological lead U.S. conventional forces have, demonstrated by Operation Iraqi Freedom.

According to Nezavisimaya Gazeta, the Russian exercises "will be linked with destroying the U.S. satellite group in order to neutralize the NAVSTAR global navigation system, the Keyhole optoelectronic intelligence satellites, and the Lacross radio-locating intelligence satellites."

The paper said about these maneuvers: "Under actual conditions of a war this would 'blind' the Pentagon and does not let the U.S. use high-precision weapons against Russian military groups."

So far, the exercises are to include Four Tu-160 and nine Tu-95MS strategic bombers, 12 Tu-22M3 long-range bombers, and four Il-78 flying tankers will be involved in the maneuvers on May 17-18.

The maneuvers are of a "global scale," the paper said.

Major-General Igor Khvorov, commander of the 37th air army of the High Commander-in-Chief, said that the official objective of the exercise is to polish cooperation between long-range aviation, the navy and other branches of the army in the western, eastern, northern and southern regions of the Russian Federation, and over the world's oceans. This emphasizes the global scale of the impending maneuvers.

Submarines of the Northern and Pacific fleets will launch ballistic missiles. Nuclear strategic and multi-purpose submarines, surface warships of different types, coastal missile and anti-aircraft units, and the missile-carrying, pursuit and anti-submarine aviation will be involved in the exercise.

The paper also noted that Russian warships sent to the Arabian Sea to take part in an exercise with the Indian navy will support strategic units. They will find and destroy U.S. Los Angeles-class submarines and deliver missile strikes at enemy warships.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Finny
I wish the "duplicate post" police would just stow it. Maybe they have the luxury of monitoring FreeRepublic anytime, all the time, for interesting threads, but I don't. I can only log-on for an hour or two a day, and don't have time to scroll through the past 22 hours of threads for topics that interest me. I say, THANK GOD for duplicate posts, otherwise I'd miss out on some interesting stuff.

Well said. The duplication police need to get a life.

41 posted on 05/19/2003 8:34:38 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Can't answer that. How do you know what stories to search for?
42 posted on 05/19/2003 8:35:31 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: paltz
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/search?s=russia&ok=Search&q=quick&m=any&o=time&SX=3ec8fa21c193d0a817fc2e293bc64451efaed707
43 posted on 05/19/2003 8:37:51 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
The word RUSSIA worked quite well; see my post above.
44 posted on 05/19/2003 8:38:24 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Even the exact title worked:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/search?m=any;o=score;s=Russia%20Preparing%20for%20Nuclear%20Attacks%20on%20U.S%2C%20Britain
45 posted on 05/19/2003 8:39:02 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
See my post number 41
46 posted on 05/19/2003 8:39:20 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Tell it to the AM, who locked duplicate threads all day long.
47 posted on 05/19/2003 8:40:17 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
In this case, it was because I've posted on both of the other threads.
48 posted on 05/19/2003 8:40:50 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You tell them, if it bothers you so much. I bet they won't lock this thread.
49 posted on 05/19/2003 8:41:40 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: paltz
In a stunning turn of events, Paraguay defeated the Russian mock menuevers by deploying their fish trolling division at the request of the USA.
50 posted on 05/19/2003 8:42:48 AM PDT by smith288 (Why do liberals believe every ammendment is personal but the 2nd?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
What's everyone else's beef?

"Search" has always worked fine for me, as well.

The other FR search feature, "Find in Forum.... by title/keyword/poster" doesn't seem to be as reliable, so I don't use it.




51 posted on 05/19/2003 8:43:04 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Duplicate threads are a Liberal/Socialist/Communist/Anarchist/Atheist ploy to irritate FReepers and pit us against each another and to clutter up the servers and waste bandwdith and kill unborn children and promote homelessness and raise internet taxes and wear out keyboards and cause SUV's to kill innocent people and cause contrails in the skies. The evils of duplicate threads outweigh the benefits.
52 posted on 05/19/2003 8:47:11 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Search doesn't always work.

Lighten up.

53 posted on 05/19/2003 8:47:13 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr; Finny; Poohbah; SJackson; madfly; Terriergal; mhking; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
How do you know what stories to search for?

This is the purpose of ping lists. You miss a lot less of what's happening on FR.

SJackson, madfly, Terriergal, mhking, Ernest_at_the_Beach, Alouette, Pokey78, MeeknMing, farmfriend, and John Huang2 all have a number of ping lists on different topics of interest. So do others.




54 posted on 05/19/2003 8:50:01 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I think you have to be in the same forum as the article in question.
55 posted on 05/19/2003 8:52:57 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All
Maybe you guys could start a couple of threads dealing with duplicate threads. This thread is going to get moved to chat.
56 posted on 05/19/2003 8:55:37 AM PDT by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: okkev68
And then we can have duplicate threads about duplicate threads. And then duplicate threads about duplicated threads about duplicate threads. And then duplicate......
57 posted on 05/19/2003 8:57:05 AM PDT by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I understand the purpose of ping lists. And I am on several. However, it is impractical to be on every ping list, and that is what it would take to make sure that one never missed any important posts in the FR.

If the purpose of avoiding duplicate posts is to save bandwidth usage, I would argue that everyone being on every ping list would use an incredible amount of bandwidth in itself. IMHO.

In the meanwhile, I am happy to let the mods do the picking and choosing as to what is duplicate and what is not.

58 posted on 05/19/2003 9:01:51 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
If there are already two similar threads, doesn't this thread become a "triplicate?" ;o)
59 posted on 05/19/2003 9:05:01 AM PDT by ASA Vet ("Those who know, don't talk. Those who talk, don't know." (I'm in the 2nd group.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Yes, and this is a virtual carbon :o)
60 posted on 05/19/2003 9:05:44 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson