Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Shocks with Promise to Back Anti-Smoking Pact (Tommy Thompson told journalists (WHO)) )
reuters ^ | 5/18/2003 | Karen Iley

Posted on 05/18/2003 11:41:47 AM PDT by TLBSHOW

U.S. Shocks with Promise to Back Anti-Smoking Pact

GENEVA (Reuters) - The United States said Sunday it would fully support a global anti-smoking treaty at this week's world health meeting, startling observers by dropping its objections to the pact.

"I'm going to support it -- much to the surprise of many around the world," U.S. Health Secretary Tommy Thompson told journalists on the eve of the World Health Organization's (WHO) annual assembly.

Despite having some of the world's toughest anti-smoking rules, the United States, along with Germany, had opposed a clause to ban advertising saying it went against constitutional guarantees to free speech.

In what appeared to be an about-turn on the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the world's first international treaty on health, Thompson said he would not call for alterations to the text.

"I'm not going to make any changes. We have no reservations. The delegation here, headed by me, is in support of the tobacco treaty," he said.

Health activists said they were thrilled by the U.S. change of heart on tobacco.

"It's an astonishing departure from the obstructionist position the United States has taken throughout the negotiations," said Kathryn Mulvey, executive director of U.S. anti-smoking alliance Infact.

However Thompson stopped short of saying the United States would ratify the pact, which aims to wean the world off a habit that kills almost five million people a year.

President Bush, bogged down with other issues such as Iraq and getting the economy back on track, had not yet had a chance to review the text with his lawyers, he said.

"The president is going to make a determination as to if and when he signs it... He's still reviewing it. It got up on his personal radar screen this past week, I've given him my pitch and he was quite supportive," he said.

The treaty seeks to tackle the consequences of tobacco use with measures ranging from a halt in advertising to a crackdown on smuggling and a ban on cigarette sales to minors.

The United Nations health agency predicts the number of people dying each year from cancer, cardiovascular disease and other conditions linked to smoking could exceed 10 million by 2020, with 70 percent of the victims in the developing world


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antismoking; pact; pufflist; shocks; unitednations; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: TLBSHOW
As I say on the other puff_list threads. The smoking nazis are everywhere.

And to the smoking nazis here on FR, keep one thing in mind,
Why is it that liberals want to legalize crack yet ban smoking?

61 posted on 05/18/2003 2:02:07 PM PDT by Dengar01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dengar01
Why is it that liberals want to legalize crack yet ban smoking?

Because they do not like tobacco?

62 posted on 05/18/2003 2:03:28 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: exodus
This is no more a legal act it than it would be if President Bush promoted an international treaty banning private ownership of handguns.

Don't give them any ideas.

63 posted on 05/18/2003 2:04:39 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
He has done a fabulous job of playing the Dim's game and he is winning it politically, don't you agree?

I agree that he is doing a lot that we wouldn't let the Dems get away with.

64 posted on 05/18/2003 2:05:13 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I see the big picture of keeping Ds out of power. I do not see how abusing constitutional rights does such.
65 posted on 05/18/2003 2:06:30 PM PDT by Gabz (anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Yes. Do you know about some openings for me?

I've heard rumor of "Rush Limbaugh" retiring in the near future.

Are you interested? hehe!

66 posted on 05/18/2003 2:06:51 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: pragmatic_asian
This seems to be almost as big a waste of time as the UN.

I put them on the same level.

67 posted on 05/18/2003 2:08:13 PM PDT by Gabz (anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
I see the big picture of keeping Ds out of power. I do not see how abusing constitutional rights does such.

It's called fighting fire with fire, so if one want's to vent frustration because of loss of freedom's one should vent towards the Dim's.

68 posted on 05/18/2003 2:10:19 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: carenot
I agree that he is doing a lot that we wouldn't let the Dems get away with.

Please post them for I guess in my busy life I have missed those atrocities that "Dubya'" has gotten away with.

69 posted on 05/18/2003 2:14:43 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
It's called fighting fire with fire, so if one want's to vent frustration because of loss of freedom's one should vent towards the Dim's.

Which is generally where my venting is aimed.

However, when I have a Republican working to remove my freedoms, I vent in that direction - as I am doing against Thommy boy here. As I said earlier - he was not on the ballot when I voted in 2000 - he's a nothing but a bureaucrat and deserves every bit of derison as any clintonista bureaucrat earned.

70 posted on 05/18/2003 2:14:55 PM PDT by Gabz (anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
lol yep run with their issues and expand them even more, what a plan.........

LOL?... Just where has "Dubya'" embraced them? And do you think that since "Dubya'" has taken office that things have gotten worse? Or taken even a lateral move?

TLBSHOW, alas, You have disappointed me.

71 posted on 05/18/2003 2:23:07 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
"We need to get a letter writing campaign to the White House going on this. "
--

I agree. I guess Thompson ooesn't see the implication, that we are subordinating out sovereignity to the UN over this, allowing the UN to chip away at our freedom of speech, thereby superceding the Constitution. Today "just a minor thing that everyone agrees with, that tobacco is bad for you and people should be prevented from using it, even though it's perfectly legal", tomorrow it's the food, they have already been working on UN resolutions to take away the indiviual's right to own a gun....

So when are we going to throw out our Constitution and adopt the UN's? (/sarcasm)
72 posted on 05/18/2003 2:25:49 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: husky ed
I think it's more like Bush has his hands full with a lot of stuff, and some people try to sneak this past.
73 posted on 05/18/2003 2:27:09 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
Every time I see this, I keep asking myself, why, oh, why are we still in the UN?!

http://www.getusout.org
74 posted on 05/18/2003 2:31:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FreeRadical
Apparently you would have been happier if Gore were president?

Maybe you don't realize that Clinton actually signed us up for the International Court treaty, and Bush "unsigned it".
75 posted on 05/18/2003 2:35:16 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
as I am doing against Thommy boy here. As I said earlier - he was not on the ballot when I voted in 2000 - he's a nothing but a bureaucrat and deserves every bit of derison as any clintonista bureaucrat earned.

I understand the frustration, as I did for 6 months before the invation of Iraq. It will work out and as I have said in the past, it takes time. Being from MN, I remember TT when he was Governor in WI. The press hated him because people in WI were going to starve because of his welfare reform program. Well not a one person starved and in the long run WI's revenues went up because of a decrease in spending and the WI people loved him. Being a bureaucrat leaves one open for discrediting, but to be compared to a "CLINTON BUREAUCRAT" is on the verge of fighting words!

76 posted on 05/18/2003 2:37:45 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: pragmatic_asian
I think this stat is a little low unless you mean die before some sort of nominal average life span.

Yeah, I should have made that clear, just think of whole Nations dying of aids alone, and the UN worries about smoking.

77 posted on 05/18/2003 2:38:54 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What?

How did this happen? Is Thompson fired yet?

78 posted on 05/18/2003 2:39:04 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
However Thompson stopped short of saying the United States would ratify the pact, which aims to wean the world off a habit that kills almost five million people a year.

Everybody needs to remember the above and calm down until if and when the president signs this piece of garbage.

79 posted on 05/18/2003 2:39:55 PM PDT by LisaFab (Free Miguel Estrada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Because they do not like tobacco?

No, it's because, although it is dwindeling, big tabacco supports Republicans with their political gratuities.

Always remember when it comes to money...Democrat financiers..small Rebublican financiers..BIG, hence the name "Big tabacco".

80 posted on 05/18/2003 2:51:07 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson