Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bored With Baghdad — Already
The New York Times Company ^ | May 18, 2003 | THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Posted on 05/18/2003 11:00:30 AM PDT by arthur003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 18, 2003

Bored With Baghdad — Already

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

AGHDAD, Iraq

Last Wednesday two top U.S. generals in Iraq held a news conference in Baghdad's half-wrecked convention center. The subject was deteriorating security and the two officers, Lt. Gen. David McKiernan and Maj. Gen. Buford Blount III, were pummeled by the press about why they weren't doing more to make Baghdad safer. It was 102 degrees, and in the middle of the session all the lights went out. The two generals looked like they were enjoying this encounter about as much as a root canal. At one point General Blount, explaining why his men didn't just shoot looters, said: "They were not threatening soldiers. They were just stealing something."

Frankly, my heart went out to the generals, both of whom distinguished themselves in this war. First, they were stuck explaining U.S. policy in Baghdad, because Jay Garner's hapless nation-building team rarely spoke to anyone, and his replacement, L. Paul Bremer, had just arrived.

But the generals were also miscast because they and their men are trained to kill people, not chase looters. Neither they nor their men want to be serving as the police, and they were not prepared to do that. They came to Baghdad with 1,800 military police officers. Saddam Hussein used 20,000 police officers to control this city of five million.

But when Saddam vanished, so did his police and government. This created a power vacuum that we were not ready to fill. This unleashed the looting, which Donald Rumsfeld blithely dismissed with his infamous line: "Freedom is untidy. Free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things." And so they did. Many pieces of Iraq's economic and governmental infrastructure — which the U.S. Air Force carefully spared with its smart bombs — were destroyed from the ground up by dumb looters or saboteurs, while we watched. Chaos is untidy. Freedom requires limits.

Drive around Basra and see what looters have done to just one institution: the 12,000-student Basra University. It looks like a tornado hit it. Looters have made off with all the desks and chairs, ransacked the library, and were last seen by my colleague Marc Santora ripping out window frames and digging up cables. Check out some of the factories around Baghdad, or many ministries, power plants, oil refineries, police stations, water systems. All have been hobbled by looting — which is why power is in short supply, phones don't work, and gas lines are a mile long.

"There are no police in my neighborhood, no judge — I can kill you right now and no one will say a thing," Hasanian Muallah, an engineer, said to me. "We're very happy to get rid of Saddam, but we're depressed by the situation on the street. People don't care who is going to be vice president. They just want a government."

I am sure things will improve. But after traveling around central Iraq, here's what worries me: The buildup to this war was so exhausting, the coverage of the dash to Baghdad so telegenic, and the climax of the toppling of Saddam's statue so dramatic, that everyone who went through it seems to prefer that the story just end there. The U.S. networks changed the subject after the fall of Baghdad as fast as you can say "Laci Peterson," and President Bush did the same as fast as you can say "tax cuts."

They are not only underestimating how hard nation building will be with this brutalized people, but how much the looting and power vacuum have put us into an even deeper hole. We need an emergency airlift of military police officers, a mobile telephone system so people can communicate, and a TV station. And we need, as one U.S. general said to me, to "take that $600 million of Saddam's money we found behind that wall, go up in a helicopter and spread it from one end of the country to the other." We have to get the economy going.

Iraqis are an exhausted people. Most seem ready to give us a chance, and we do have a shot at making this a decent place — but not with nation building lite. That approach is coming unstuck in Afghanistan and it will never work in Iraq. We've wasted an important month. We must get our act together and our energy up. Why doesn't Mr. Rumsfeld brief reporters every day about rebuilding Iraq, the way he did about destroying Saddam?

America is in an imperial role here, now. Our security and standing in the world ride on our getting Iraq right. If the Bush team has something more important to do, I'd like to know about it. Iraq can still go wrong for a hundred Iraqi reasons, but let's make sure it's not because America got bored, tired or distracted.

Copyright 2003


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baghdad; basra; blount; iraq; iraqifreedom; jaygarner; lpaulbremer; mckiernan; media; occupation; order; postwariraq; rumsfeld; thomaslfriedman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2003 11:00:30 AM PDT by arthur003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: arthur003
Iraq can still go wrong for a hundred Iraqi reasons

Wishful thinking.

2 posted on 05/18/2003 11:04:54 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthur003
I agree with this assesment. We're walking away from our problem there and it will bite us in the butt down the road.
3 posted on 05/18/2003 11:05:14 AM PDT by Arkie2 (TSA ="Thousands standing around")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthur003
The Left said, "Give the U.N. inspectors more time. There's no need to rush." Now they say, "Find WMD's immediately! Establish perfect democracy in Iraq overnight!" Typical Lefty hypocricy.
4 posted on 05/18/2003 11:07:26 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY (((Resist the Leftist Media Brainwashing Machine)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthur003
"Why doesn't Mr. Rumsfeld brief reporters every day about rebuilding Iraq, the way he did about destroying Saddam?"

Probably for the same reason that your newspaper's sports section doesn't cover the Jets and Giants daily during baseball season. Idiot !
5 posted on 05/18/2003 11:15:58 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
If the Left had won this argument, Iraqis would still be maimed, raped, tortured and murdered. Now they whine that we have (gasp) American generals who won't off looters. Where is "reinventing government" Al Gore when you need him? What? The Left has nothing but complaints - and no suggestions or offers of assistance (aside from, forget Iraq and get back to the [real] war on terror')? I'm shocked.....
6 posted on 05/18/2003 11:16:37 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Who has walked away?
7 posted on 05/18/2003 11:18:10 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arthur003
God, this columnist hates his country. Why isn't he over there lending a hand instead of pounding out criticisms in his comfy computer chair?

I'm waiting for a column from him that dumps on the shortcomings of his own NYT instead of our guys striving to do a job over in the Iraqi mare's nest.

Leni

8 posted on 05/18/2003 11:19:14 AM PDT by MinuteGal (THIS JUST IN ! Astonishing fare reduction for FReeps Ahoy Cruise! Check it out, pronto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Who has walked away?

LOL. The media.

Unfortunately, some people gauge how much importance the Administration places on an issue by looking at how much coverage it gets on cable news.

9 posted on 05/18/2003 11:23:09 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arthur003
We don't hear much about Bagdad, just little events and various little people complaining about little things as if these represent Bagdad life these days. Heard someone in the military admin saying that Bagdad is a mess and not because of the war. It is a mess due to neglect by Saddam's regieme for however many years. There's a lot of building to do. Who knows, it could end up being the most modern city in the ME. Right now, it's a mess and hearing about one more little looter is a waste of bandwidth. Let's hear about city utilities: electric grid, water and sewer, communication, markets, housing, city buses, the things that everybody needs in their city but no one seems to pay any attention to until they are a mess. Even news about the 30s art deco airport with avocado appliances would be better than interviews with rabble-rouser malcontents.
10 posted on 05/18/2003 11:23:51 AM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthur003
But when Saddam vanished, so did his police and government. This created a power vacuum that we were not ready to fill. This unleashed the looting, which Donald Rumsfeld blithely dismissed with his infamous line: "Freedom is untidy. Free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things."

So there is a difference between liberating Iraq and liberating Europe?

11 posted on 05/18/2003 11:24:11 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthur003
Yes, it can, but it's not going to. He's right about getting a telephone system and television as soon as possible, but they also need electricity to run those TVs.

We probably should get some policemen in there as soon as possible, not just from the US but from the UK, Poland, Spain, and as many of the other countries as we can (The Aussies are busy in their own part of the world and we can't ask them)

They need to explain to the Iraqis that they don't want the old guys to come back because of the corruption and it's going to take some time to train new people. We need their help. Each local leader should get volunteers to help guard things to stop the looting.

12 posted on 05/18/2003 11:25:32 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
Friedman is being so... Friedman!
13 posted on 05/18/2003 11:26:37 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
God, this columnist hates his country.

He doesn't hate America, he's just badly conflicted. I believe that in his heart of hearts he really is a right-wing hawk but he tries hard to suppress these feelings given that he thinks he is a progressive and he works at the Times. He just needs therapy to work through his inner demons.

14 posted on 05/18/2003 11:29:46 AM PDT by jalisco555 (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
You're right. Also, they have been anxious from the minute the war ended to find anything they could use to discredit Bush. The phony "museum looting" story is a perfect example.
15 posted on 05/18/2003 11:32:16 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

The United States never lost a war or won a [peace] conference.

Will Rogers, remarks following the Versailles Peace Conference


16 posted on 05/18/2003 11:39:23 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Face it: he's about as close to a conservative Republican as one can get at The New York Times. Dowd, of course, is an incoherent lefty whose columns make no sense whatsoever. But think of what Krugman would write as a foreign-affairs columnist. He might be coherent, but his facts would be as far from the truth as those promulgated by a famous Iraqi, Muhammad Saeed al-Sabri.
17 posted on 05/18/2003 11:40:21 AM PDT by dufekin (Peace HAS COME AT LONG LAST to the tortured people of Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Who has walked away?

The media. What they need is a Laci Peterson type story over there so they can get some coverage again.

18 posted on 05/18/2003 12:04:16 PM PDT by husky ed (FOX NEWS ALERT "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead" THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: husky ed
I miss the embeds...
19 posted on 05/18/2003 12:13:32 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
Sorry, Friedman is a leftist, period. Occasionally, like a blind squirrel he drops a column that gets conservatives all a-twitter. I don't care to psycholanalyze his inner core. To me, he and the NYT which pays him are foes of conservatives and our President. I don't get all fuzzy when he finds an acorn once in a while.

Leni

20 posted on 05/18/2003 12:55:29 PM PDT by MinuteGal (THIS JUST IN ! Astonishing fare reduction for FReeps Ahoy Cruise! Check it out, pronto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson