Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timesink
RE your post #92 - LOL! :)

Timesink, what you now realize is what I think Howard Kurtz meant in his televised suggestion about a new law: that we have to start recognizing "journalism fraud" here in this Jayson Blair case has reached incredible, new levels, previously unimagined. And, this activity can not continue, even if the NYT management disagrees and insists there is a rational for actively encouraging it.
97 posted on 05/18/2003 11:34:23 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: summer
Timesink, what you now realize is what I think Howard Kurtz meant in his televised suggestion about a new law: that we have to start recognizing "journalism fraud" here in this Jayson Blair case has reached incredible, new levels, previously unimagined. And, this activity can not continue, even if the NYT management disagrees and insists there is a rational for actively encouraging it.

Yes, you're probably right. I wish I'd seen the Kurtz chat live.

110 posted on 05/18/2003 11:59:21 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson