Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: summer
Timesink, what you now realize is what I think Howard Kurtz meant in his televised suggestion about a new law: that we have to start recognizing "journalism fraud" here in this Jayson Blair case has reached incredible, new levels, previously unimagined. And, this activity can not continue, even if the NYT management disagrees and insists there is a rational for actively encouraging it.

Yes, you're probably right. I wish I'd seen the Kurtz chat live.

110 posted on 05/18/2003 11:59:21 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Timesink
If Kurtz really meant what he said -- and, I hope he did -- maybe other news shows will invite him on to elaborate. Truly, something has to change. Jayson Blair should not be rewarded for his fraud.
111 posted on 05/18/2003 12:01:54 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Timesink, what you now realize is what I think Howard Kurtz meant in his televised suggestion about a new law

Liberals love laws rather than using good old fashioned blackballing.

115 posted on 05/18/2003 12:15:37 PM PDT by Helms (Californication Beyond California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson