Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gitmo
Apparently the authors of the book conclude that this was a terrorist attack, not something fired from our Navy. The coverup was to avoid panic from the public. I am sure the airline industry didn't want this known either. Clinton wouldn't want it known as it might reflect badly on him and security?
I haven't read the book yet, but I saw an article about it on FR the other night.
34 posted on 05/17/2003 9:31:04 AM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ladyinred
No different that Flight #587 - 11/11/01 - during Bush's watch. Both were terrorist incidents, and the airline industry would've been utterly annihilated had the truth been let out about either.
35 posted on 05/17/2003 9:34:28 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson