Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Six out of 10 Americans Say Homosexual Relations Should Be Recognized as Legal
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE ^ | May 15, 2003 | Frank Newport

Posted on 05/15/2003 12:16:22 PM PDT by Remedy

But Americans are evenly divided on issue of legal civil unions between homosexuals giving them the legal rights of married couples

PRINCETON, NJ -- Attitudes toward homosexuality and homosexual relations continue to be one of the more complex areas of public opinion that Gallup measures. The issue is not only one of significant concern because of its traditional moral and religious overtones, but in recent years it has been at the center of state and federal legislative battles, highly publicized court challenges, and political debate.

Gallup's recent Values and Beliefs survey shows that a majority of Americans accept the idea that homosexual relations between consenting adults should be legal and that homosexuality is an acceptable way of life. The acceptance of homosexuality as legal is now at the 60% level, up from 52% last year and 43% when Gallup first began asking about it in 1977. The recent survey also finds that almost 9 out of 10 Americans agree that homosexuals should have equal rights in terms of job opportunities, although opinions on allowing homosexual couples to legally form civil unions, giving them some of the legal rights of married couples, are evenly divided.

A plurality of Americans believe that homosexuality is something that is a result of one's upbringing or environment, rather than being a genetic trait with which a person is born, although opinion on this has been somewhat inconsistent over time.

Should Homosexuality Be Legal?

Gallup first asked about the legality of homosexuality in 1977, with a basic question worded as follows: "Do you think homosexual relations between consenting adults should or should not be legal?" At that point, Americans were evenly divided on the issue, as 43% said yes, 43% said no, and 14% were not sure. In Gallup's recent Values and Beliefs poll, conducted May 5-7, the public has clearly become more moderate toward homosexuality than was the case two decades earlier: 60% of Americans now say that homosexual relations should be legal, 35% not legal, with 5% unsure. During the mid-1980s, the percentage saying that homosexual relations should be legal dropped to as low as 32%, perhaps resulting from either the conservative environment ushered in by the Reagan administration, or the beginning of widespread publicity surrounding AIDS and its prevalence in the homosexual community.

Equal Job Opportunities

Over the same time period, there has also been significant change in attitudes about employment rights for homosexuals. The specific Gallup question asks: "As you may know, there has been considerable discussion in the news regarding the rights of homosexual men and women. In general, do you think homosexuals should or should not have equal rights in terms of job opportunities?" The percentage saying yes is now 88%, similar to recent years, but significantly higher than the 56% when first recorded in 1977. As recently as 1992, fewer than four in five Americans felt homosexuals should be given equal treatment in hiring.

Thus, there is a gap between the 60% of the public saying that homosexual relations should be legal, and the 88% saying that homosexuals should have equal rights in the workplace. These two questions may play to different norms that exist in contemporary America. The legality question may tap into a general sense of morality, and a reluctance of a more conservative segment of society to sanction what they consider to be deviant behavior. The question about equal opportunity, on the other hand, may invoke the public's attitudes about discrimination, fair play, and equal treatment.

Homosexuality as an Acceptable Lifestyle

Indeed, a sizable percentage of Americans continue to frown on the homosexual lifestyle. In 1982, Gallup distinguished between Americans' personal feelings about homosexuality from their opinions about its legality by asking this question: "Do you feel that homosexuality should be considered an acceptable alternative lifestyle or not?" At that time, just 34% said yes. Public acceptance on this measure has increased incrementally since that point, and our latest poll shows that a small majority, 54%, now agrees that homosexuality should be considered an acceptable lifestyle. Still, that leaves a substantial minority of 43% who disagree.

There are significant differences in willingness to accept homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle within subgroups of the American population. In general, the following groups are most likely to agree that such relationships are acceptable:

Nature or Nurture?

Part of the argument about homosexuality through the years has focused on the issue of how much control an individual has over his or her sexual orientation. Many gay and lesbian leaders stress the fact that homosexuality is an inborn trait, and -- similar to gender or race -- is not a decision over which an individual has direct control. The classic Gallup Poll question designed to get at this issue -- first used in 1977 -- asks if homosexuality is "something a person is born with or is homosexuality due to other factors such as upbringing or environment?"

In 1977, the public was more likely to agree with the argument that homosexuality is due to factors such as one's upbringing and environment, rather than the argument that homosexuality is something with which a person is born -- by a margin of 56% to 13%. Twenty-six years later, in 2003, the percentage of Americans accepting the genetic argument has more than doubled to 38%, while the percentage agreeing that homosexuality is environmentally caused has dropped to 44%. Thus, a slight plurality of Americans now agrees with the "nurture" argument over the "nature" argument. Still, unlike other trend questions that have moved to a more liberal orientation in this year's survey, the "upbringing/environment" alternative in response to this question is more prevalent now than it was in either 2001 or 2002.

Should Homosexual Couples Be Given the Same Legal Rights as Married Couples?

The answer to this question is a clear "yes" if the issue is simply whether gay or lesbian partners should be able to share healthcare and Social Security survivor benefits. Americans are less supportive if providing legal rights is done in the context of establishing a right of civil unions for gays and lesbians, akin to marriage.

Polling in recent years has consistently shown that at least 6 out of 10 Americans are opposed to the recognition of marriages between homosexuals as legally valid unions, with the same rights as traditional marriages.

If the question is re-phrased to emphasize giving "some of the legal rights of married couples," but without the assumption that they would in some ways be "married," public opinion breaks even. In May 2002, 46% favored a law that would "allow homosexual couples to legally form civil unions, giving them some of the legal rights of married couples," while 51% opposed. This year, opinion is exactly divided, with 49% in favor and 49% opposed.

At the same time, a question that asks about giving homosexual couples the same legal rights as married heterosexual couples "regarding healthcare benefits and Social Security survivor benefits" finds 62% agreement.

Survey Methods

These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected national sample of 1,005 adults, aged 18 and older, conducted May 5-7, 2003. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±3 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; homosexualagenda; liewithstatistics; medaibias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last
To: caisson71
I agree, the '6 out of 10' statistical assertion is BS indeed.
41 posted on 05/15/2003 1:00:08 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Your point? Everything in the article is correct...except the fact that the "State of Texas" has jurisdiction in the matter.

By the way, just from what you posted, if you and your wife are monogomous and stay a virgin until married, this isn't a problem is it!?!?

So obey God's will, and only marry a man or woman who has and its a non-issue....
42 posted on 05/15/2003 1:00:35 PM PDT by borntodiefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
They did this survey in Austin, Texas, Berkley & San Francisco, California, Princeton, New Jersey, and New York, New York, didn't they?
43 posted on 05/15/2003 1:01:27 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Furthermore, after the gay marriage thing passes, the next 'lifestyle' for which they'll demand legal recognition and protection is swinging, then bestiality, then who knows what else

Thanks for a brilliant demonstation of the logical fallacy known as the slippery slope.
44 posted on 05/15/2003 1:03:02 PM PDT by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: borntodiefree

if you and your wife are monogomous and stay a virgin until married, this isn't a problem is it!?!?

So obey God's will, and only marry a man or woman who has and its a non-issue....

Get 3/4 of the population doing as you suggest and most of the problems this country has will become insignificant.

45 posted on 05/15/2003 1:06:13 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
You should update your anti-gay spamsheet.

The bug-chaser story, in particular, was debunked in less than 48 hours. Touting false information makes you look like a liar, or an idiot.
46 posted on 05/15/2003 1:07:28 PM PDT by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
OK. Then tax 'em.....
47 posted on 05/15/2003 1:08:56 PM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
.......their rumps should be tatooed. "Warning: The Surgeon General has determined that Annal Sex May Be Hazardous to Your Health."
29 posted on 05/15/2003 2:50 PM CDT by Remedy


Wow! Hitler had almost the same idea!Identify them all, round them up, and then.......Now we know what you are.


48 posted on 05/15/2003 1:09:29 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Agreed, and if they don't, then I can break down the issue of rebellion against God's law into a four word response.

"You Play .... You Pay"

49 posted on 05/15/2003 1:09:39 PM PDT by borntodiefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
Then 6 out of 10 Americans are full of shit.

I do not believe the statistics...

50 posted on 05/15/2003 1:10:42 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Austin, Texas, Berkley & San Francisco, California, Princeton, New Jersey, and New York, New York, didn't they?

Liberals 79%

Those living in the West -67

Those living in urban settings - 64

51 posted on 05/15/2003 1:12:54 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
4 out of 5 dentists recommend Wonder Bread for patients who chew bread.
52 posted on 05/15/2003 1:12:59 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
I simply can not see two men sitting on a couch smooching, ain't natural.
53 posted on 05/15/2003 1:13:08 PM PDT by gulfcoast6 (A friend is one YOU are there for through thick and thin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steplock
Mohammad received visions from Allah while Laying with pre-teenage girls.
54 posted on 05/15/2003 1:16:51 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Belial
Someone's got a major agenda.....
55 posted on 05/15/2003 1:24:36 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Beware the Rodham Fedayeen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
Someone's got a major agenda.....

Someone likes to talk out the corner of their mouth...
56 posted on 05/15/2003 1:26:11 PM PDT by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Belial
ANDY SULLIVAN DEBUNK IT FOR YOU - SODOMY : Why a 'Gay' Activist Columnist at The Washington Times?

CBC News: Disclosure - Russian Roulette

With Fears Fading, More Gays Spurn Old Preventive Message (repost)

Bug Chasers and the Thought Police

57 posted on 05/15/2003 1:27:12 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
post #57
58 posted on 05/15/2003 1:28:13 PM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Remedy
??? Legalized, hell I can't even figure out why it's even considered criminal???

I believe in freedom of religon and part of that freedom infers that we don't place our religous dictates and standards upon others.
59 posted on 05/15/2003 1:28:48 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bisesi
How can anyone support a biological activity, that if practiced by everyone, would mean the END of the HUMNAN RACE.

So after we've taken care of the non-reproducing homosexuals, are nuns next on the list?

60 posted on 05/15/2003 1:32:25 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson