Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Dr. Christy keeps up his good work.

1.25 degrees F = 0.75 degrees C.

1 posted on 05/15/2003 9:11:41 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cogitator
Here in Central Alabama I'm worried about global wetting. It has rained constantly for weeks now.
2 posted on 05/15/2003 9:17:07 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Will Rogers never met me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
Many climate models forecast that global warming should be happening at a rate much faster than that seen by either the UAH satellite dataset or the weather balloon data.

From the Climate Change 2001, Working Group I: The Scientific Basis 9.2.2.4 Uncertainty):

Missing or misrepresented physics: No attempt has been made to quantify the uncertainty in model projections of climate change due to missing or misrepresented physics. Current models attempt to include the dominant physical processes that govern the behavior and the response of the climate system to specified forcing scenarios. Studies of "missing" processes are often carried out, for instance of the effect of aerosols on cloud lifetimes, but until the results are well-founded, of appreciable magnitude, and robust in a range of models, they are considered to be studies of sensitivity rather than projections of climate change. Physical processes which are misrepresented in one or more, but not all, models will give rise to differences which will be reflected in the ensemble standard deviation.

So, the physics (and probably the chemistry) of these models is wrong (or at least incomplete) but that's no big deal to those who use them.

I've downloaded the current climate model software used by these folks (CAM2) and, as soon as my Beowulf cluster is up and running, intentd to investigate the sensitivity of model predictions to the uncertainties in their underlying representation of the physics (and chemistry) involved.

3 posted on 05/15/2003 9:44:26 AM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
But we won't find this reported in any of the liberal media, will we?
5 posted on 05/15/2003 9:57:00 AM PDT by The Gunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
Does this mean we're not all doomed and everyone can relax now?
6 posted on 05/15/2003 9:57:46 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ancient_geezer; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Grampa Dave; Lancey Howard; RandyRep; blam; TomB
Ping!
13 posted on 05/15/2003 10:35:09 AM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
Thanks for this post. I have a new youngster here at work who has only heard about the "calamity" of global warming. How the sky is falling and it's all SUV's fault. I don't have time to get into a full fledged discussion right now. Maybe this will hold him over for a bit.
17 posted on 05/15/2003 11:19:41 AM PDT by Ga Rob ("Life's tough...it's even tougher when you're stupid"....The Duke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator; jimkress; The Gunner; jpl; johniegrad; colorado tanker; Reeses; PeaceBeWithYou; ...
Cogitator - Just a damn minute!

How in the hell do you explain this:

Winter in Big Cities of the East Ranked Among the Coldest Since 1950 -

HIGH LATITUDE BLOCKING AND RECORD SNOWCOVER A KEY TO THIS WINTER

Written March 10, 2003
by Joe D'Aleo
Chief WSI/INTELLICAST Meteorologist


In our winter outlook in the fall we showed why the oceans were in a mode, which favored enhanced high latitude blocking, which would make this El Nino colder than the ones we were used to in recent decades.

The degree of high latitude blocking is measured by two climate indices, the North Atlantic and Arctic Oscillations. In recent stories, we showed how the negative mode of both modes favored colder and often snowier than normal conditions in the eastern United States and Europe, even in El Nino winters. The indices were at or near the most negative values observed since 1950 especially during the early winter from October to December.

October to December Arctic Oscillation values were the most negative since 1950. This high latitude blocking helped generate large polar and arctic air masses that helped build deep snowcover and make the winter very cold for many areas in the hemisphere.

This high latitude blocking helped generate extensive polar and arctic air masses that brought extreme cold to places in the Northern Hemisphere. Here in North America, the flow pattern entrained frigid Siberian air to join with the cold high pressure building in Canada. The coldest air was focused on the eastern states.

With the large cold air masses came much more snow than normal across the hemisphere. In fact, according to the data compiled at the CPC, the extent of the Northern Hemisphere's snowcover from October through February was the greatest since records were started in 1973. It even exceeded the deep snowcover of the winters of the late 1970s.

October to February 2002/03 average snowcover for the Northern Hemisphere was at the highest level in the data set eclipsing the previous record set in the winter of 1976/77. From CPC: ftp://ftp.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/cpc/wd52dg/snow/snw_cvr_area/NH_AREA

PERSISTENT COLD WEATHER FROM OCTOBER TO FEBRUARY
El Nino winters are characterized dependably by a ridge in the western parts of North America and a trough in the eastern areas. With the productive Polar Regions and extensive snowcover, temperatures in the trough in the eastern states averaged persistently below normal. Temperatures during the October to February period ranked among the top ten winters since 1950 in many cities in the northeast.

In Boston, it was the second coldest such period just behind 1976/77.

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
35.42
2002/03
35.72

In New York City, the period ranked 4th coldest since 1950 behind the two memorable cold winters in the late 1970s (1976/77 and 1977/78) and the winter of 1967/68.


CENTRAL PARK, NEW YORK
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
37.55
1967/68
38.25
1977/78
39.35
2002/03
39.70

In Rochester, New York, the winter ranked 7th coldest since 1950, tied with the winter of 1969/70 (our top analog year).


ROCHESTER, NEW YORK
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
29.48
1993/94
30.38
1962/63
30.38
1981/82
31
1978/79
31.44
1969/70
31.56
2002/03
31.56

In Baltimore (BWI Airport), the winter ranked 3rd coldest behind 1976/77 and 1962/63.

BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
Year
Average Temperature
1976/77
37.04
1962/63
37.16
2002/03
38.63

What a difference a year can make. Many of these same locations during the same period last year found temperatures ranking among the warmest on record as resurgent solar activity produced a shrunken polar vortex and enhanced zonal flow, which in turn maximized the maritime influence on the continents and limited the extent of the snowcover. It also led to near record drought that lingered through the summer in many areas.

These two years demonstrate how many factors combine to choreograph the weather and climate as we march from season to season and year-to-year on our ride through time.


21 posted on 05/15/2003 12:06:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson