Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Osama's Offspring(MAUREEN DOWD ALERT!!)
nytimes ^ | May 14,2003 | MAUREEN DOWD

Posted on 05/14/2003 9:24:43 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde

May 14, 2003 Osama's Offspring By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON

We've had our regime change in the Middle East. Now Qaeda terrorists want theirs.

Even before Al Qaeda claimed credit for the explosions ripping through Riyadh on Monday night, the Saudi princes were frightened and seeking American help. They were scared that Al Qaeda, which they once used to deflect resentment away from their own corruption, had succeeded in infiltrating various levels of society, including the government.

The problem with Saudi Arabia is that it is such an opaque society, you can never be sure what's going on there from the outside — and apparently it's not spectacularly transparent from the inside, either.

U.S. intelligence analysts warned the Saudis that an attack on American interests in the kingdom was coming. The Saudis reacted the way they typically do, defensively. The anti-American chatter had become such a din in the last two weeks that the State Department had warned Americans not to travel there.

The Saudi princes reluctantly began an investigation into the possible Qaeda plot. But even in such a repressed and repressive state, Saudi security forces couldn't stop the terrorists. They tried to seize an Islamic militant cell with links to radical clerics last Tuesday. The authorities found 800 pounds of explosives, but all 19 cell members — 17 Saudis, one Iraqi and one Yemeni — escaped.

So, with a new Qaeda spokesman warning that "an attack against America is inevitable" and that "future missions have been entrusted" to a "new team . . . well protected against U.S. intelligence services," now we have to worry about 19 slippery Islamic terrorists coming at us from Saudi Arabia?

Talk about a sickening sense of déjà vu.

Busy chasing off Saddam, the president and vice president had told us that Al Qaeda was spent. "Al Qaeda is on the run," President Bush said last week. "That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated. . . . They're not a problem anymore."

Members of the U.S. intelligence community bragged to reporters that the terrorist band was crippled, noting that it hadn't attacked during the assault on Iraq.

"This was the big game for them — you put up or shut up, and they have failed," Cofer Black, who heads the State Department's counterterrorism office, told The Washington Post last week.

Of course, the other way of looking at it is that Al Qaeda works at its own pace and knows how to conduct operations on the run.

Al Qaeda has been weakened by the arrest of leaders like Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. But Osama, in recent taped messages, has exhorted his followers to launch suicide attacks against the invaders of Iraq. And as one ambassador from an Arab country noted, the pictures of American-made tanks in both Iraq and the West Bank of Israel certainly attracted new recruits to Osama.

The administration's lulling triumphalism about Al Qaeda exploded on Monday in Riyadh, when well-planned and coordinated suicide strikes with car bombs and small-arms fire killed dozens in three housing complexes favored by Westerners, including seven Americans.

The attack was timed to coincide with Colin Powell's visit to the kingdom, and clearly meant to hurt both America and Saudi Arabia. Even though Rummy announced two weeks ago in Riyadh that he was pulling the U.S. troops Osama hated so much from Saudi Arabia, Qaeda leaders still want to undermine the Saudi monarchy that has been so receptive to infidel U.S. presidents.

Buried in the rubble of Riyadh are some of the Bush administration's basic assumptions: that Al Qaeda was finished, that invading Iraq would bring regional stability and that a show of American superpower against Saddam would cow terrorists.

Bob Graham, the Florida senator running for president, said at the Capitol yesterday that Iraq had been a diversion: "We essentially ended the war on terror about a year ago. And since that time, Al Qaeda has been allowed to regenerate."

Doing a buddy routine with Rummy yesterday in Washington, as the defense secretary accepted an award, Vice President Dick Cheney was as implacable as ever. "The only way to deal with this threat ultimately is to destroy it," he said.

So destroy it.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: riyadhbombing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
For your enjoyment.....
1 posted on 05/14/2003 9:24:43 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
BTTT
2 posted on 05/14/2003 9:25:13 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Mad Mo is extremely bitter nowadays because Catherine Zeta Jones has had the baby that she will never have.
3 posted on 05/14/2003 9:28:37 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
ENOUGH with this Zeta Jones thing. Women DO get over old boyfriends, you know.
4 posted on 05/14/2003 9:32:04 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
So destroy it.

Yeah, just snap your fingers Dick and make them go away. Why don't they ever get it?

5 posted on 05/14/2003 9:32:10 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
I never comment on Dowd articles...I'm just waiting for the pics of CZJ.

FMCDH

6 posted on 05/14/2003 9:32:45 AM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Buried in the rubble of Riyadh are some of the Bush administration's basic assumptions: that Al Qaeda was finished, that invading Iraq would bring regional stability and that a show of American superpower against Saddam would cow terrorists.
Precisely the opposite is the case: and the exception of al qaeda activity in Saudi Arabia only underscores the brute facts. The Arabian penninsula is al qaeda's last redoubt. Mainly because the House of Saud resisted our efforts to follow them there, their funds, their leaders. Elsewhere in Muslim world, e.g. Yemen, Pakistan, our commanders in the field have been gleefully capturing or assassinating known or suspected al qaeda operatives. So elsewhere in the Muslim world al qaeda is finished, reduced to releasing cassettes, bombing nightclubs, and granting interviews etc.

Riyad, however, is the new Kandahar.
7 posted on 05/14/2003 9:36:13 AM PDT by Asclepius (as above, so below)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
So destroy it.

*snicker*

So let it be written, so let it be done. If only it were that easy, Mo.

It will take some time to clean up the damage left behind by the Clinton years.

8 posted on 05/14/2003 9:36:43 AM PDT by MrConfettiMan (#include <stdio.h> int main(int argc,char * argv[]) { printf("Hello, Free Republic!\n"); return 0; })
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
I'm just waiting for the pics of CZJ.

The pregnant smoking pics?

9 posted on 05/14/2003 9:37:29 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Women DO get over old boyfriends, you know.

Most of them do. Some, like Mo, don't.

10 posted on 05/14/2003 9:38:53 AM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Women DO get over old boyfriends, you know.
Oh, yeah. Women never get bitter. They just forgive and forget and move on.
11 posted on 05/14/2003 9:39:40 AM PDT by Asclepius (as above, so below)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew


12 posted on 05/14/2003 9:40:45 AM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Buried in the rubble of Riyadh are some of the Bush administration's basic assumptions: that Al Qaeda was finished, that invading Iraq would bring regional stability and that a show of American superpower against Saddam would cow terrorists.

I can't recall these assumptions ever coming from the Bush administration... I guess if she says Bush said these things, it easier for her to say "not so fast..." Can't the left argue honorably? (rhetorical question, I know)

13 posted on 05/14/2003 9:41:02 AM PDT by vrwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Women DO get over old boyfriends, you know.

Twenty-something women get over boyfriends fairly quickly - even ones they had really fallen for. Hey, they've got their whole lives ahead of them to meet someone just as good-looking, sweet, successful, etc.

Fifty-something women don't get over their last chance at happiness who just happens to be a famous, dashing movie star so quickly.

That one still smarts, I'll bet.

14 posted on 05/14/2003 9:44:03 AM PDT by wideawake (Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Fifty-something women don't get over their last chance at happiness who just happens to be a famous, dashing movie star so quickly.

And you have personal knowledge of this ... how?

15 posted on 05/14/2003 9:46:32 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Why in the hell do you take up for a low-life traitor like Dowd? She deserves a lot worse than being dumped.
16 posted on 05/14/2003 9:50:49 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: vrwinger
"Busy chasing off Saddam, the president and vice president had told us that Al Qaeda was spent. "Al Qaeda is on the run," President Bush said last week. "That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated. . . . They're not a problem anymore.""

Did Bush actually say "They're not a problem anymore"? If he did, it would be out of character, since he has never seemed to believe that terrorism can be completely wiped out, only curtailed and - hopefully - kept out of the USA. I would like to know what words Dowd omitted where those dots are; I would not be surprised if those words completely changed the meaning of the "They're not a problem anymore" comment.
17 posted on 05/14/2003 9:51:32 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
I've seen several women of the 40-50 age range get dumped by boyfriends whom they had hoped to spend the rest of their lives with.

These women were absolutely devastated - generally they'd spent several years of "serious" looking for the right guy who would be their "last chance" only to have the relationship fold within months - and be continuously dissected for years afterward.

I can only imagine what the amplifying effect of having a movie star thrown into the mix would be.

18 posted on 05/14/2003 9:53:09 AM PDT by wideawake (Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ohioman
I'm not "taking up" for her. It's just old, at this point that every single time a Dowd piece is posted, this crap comes up. We should of beating her with ideas. It's a cheap and easy (and sexist) way of discrediting her. And I think we're above that.
19 posted on 05/14/2003 9:53:42 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Are you a man, or a woman?
20 posted on 05/14/2003 9:54:22 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson