Skip to comments.
2 More NYT Reporters Being Investigated for Journalistic Irregularities
DrudgeReport ^
| May 13, 2003
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 05/14/2003 5:02:37 AM PDT by ewing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: jwalsh07
You beat me by a minute!
To: goldstategop
And apologies to Denmark too.
To: ewing
It's been a crappy paper for years, and not just because of the liberal bias. Their entire metro section has been a rip-off of the day before's NY post for a long time now. Plus, their regular news is full of inaccuracies. The liberal bias has existed not just because they are liberals, but also because it masks factual errors by turning them into opinion. Hopefully, this will get people to finally recognize that.
23
posted on
05/14/2003 5:35:19 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: ewing
So we''' see only half the news that's unfit to print? Bwah hah hah hah! Bet that meeting this afternoon is BYOBB. I wouldn't want to be seen entering or leaving that building without a brown bag over my head.
24
posted on
05/14/2003 5:38:09 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: ewing; Grampa Dave
I wonder if this exercise in 'journalistic integrity' is actually a cover for other objectives.
They just raised their prices (from 75 cents to $1) and they have declined in sales another 5% recently. At the same time, Murdoch's New York Post has gained much more than that (at 25 cents per paper) and is scooping up the younger (~25-40) readers who are the prime advertising targets.
Maybe they're going to take a more conservative tack in order to compete with WSJ (steady numbers of readers and demographics) and with the Post.
This is a lot like the battle between FNC and ABCNNBCBS. Murdoch on the attack everywhere with news organizations oriented toward the key advertising demographics and with a conservative slant.
The Slimes may be trying to save its bacon and might be just slamming down on the worst abusers to knock the rest of the staff into line. Having a work slowdown is the protest from their liberal cadre of reporters and staff.
To: ewing
I'd recommend fiber therapy or Exlax for those "irregularities".
Prairie
26
posted on
05/14/2003 5:43:21 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Tag line space for rent.)
To: ewing
The past few days have made me appreciate the Freepers who hold us to high standards, such as spelling, grammer, integrity, etc.
Thank you Ladies and Gentlemen.
To: Siouxz
Indeed. I wonder if this kind of thing is common place at the NYT. Perhaps like all liberals, they can't let the facts get in the way of their agenda.
To: wayoverontheright
Maybe Clymer. The Weekly Standard reported that Clymer had a higher correction rate in fewer articles during the same time span as Blair.
To: PBRSTREETGANG
Slow down? The reporters are only going to lie half as fast? Ding, Ding, Ding - We've got a winner. GREAT LINE. Thanks for the laugh (out loud here at work). Gotta go...
"Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."
To: ewing
From the internal NYT Memo posted on Drudge:
"You will be able to ask questions from the floor, or write them on cards that will be distributed at the door. In addition, we have set up an email address --
forum@nytimes.com -- where you can send questions, either in advance of the session or afterward."
I say a major Freep of this e-mail address is needed.
Anyone care to send your "questions" to this internal forum?
32
posted on
05/14/2003 5:58:04 AM PDT
by
Adams
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
33
posted on
05/14/2003 5:59:29 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: ewing
Dump your subscriptions. Don't ever buy this paper. Convince radio talk show hosts like Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, etc. to never mention an article in this paper again. It's only free advertising.
34
posted on
05/14/2003 6:09:49 AM PDT
by
Celantro
To: ewing
Journalistic Irregularities "Irregularities"?
I think the only thing irregular in this case is that a journalist lied.... and got caught.
To: ewing
"Journalistic Irregularities"... what a nice euphemism for lying.
To: PeterPrinciple
"
The past few days have made me appreciate the Freepers who hold us to high standards, such as spelling, grammer, integrity, etc."
Well said.
37
posted on
05/14/2003 6:27:47 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
To: ewing
Who cares about this story of tiny significance?
I want a progress report on the NY Times and Martha Burk joint campaign to have the Augusta National Golf Club admit female members. It is easy to understand how the editors may have been justifiably distracted from maintaining minimal accuracy and basic journalistic integrity. Come on! Important things first!!
We need to look at the big picture folks. Let's allow the good folks at the NY Times to continue on their honorable mission.
38
posted on
05/14/2003 6:36:05 AM PDT
by
Ghengis
To: PeterPrinciple
The past few days have made me appreciate the Freepers who hold us to high standards, such as spelling, grammer grammar, integrity, etc.
39
posted on
05/14/2003 6:39:21 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Timesink
the New York Times The NY Times held a special forum for its employees on the Blair matter. It offered employees an op to e-mail questions ahead of time or give feedback after the forum. I'd say the Times, corporate givers to Planned Parenthood, are fair game for a E-FREEP FOCUS: forum@nytimes.com
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson