[Republican_Strategist]

Bush supports the Clinton Era Ban. That was my point.

Of course it is unconstitutional. It is an infringement on the right to bear arms. Sadly you think banning semiauto guns for a "mean" appearance is constitutional. God save us.

You say Prescription Drug Coverage is constitutional. Try Article 1, Section 8. The Military is an area - redistribution/socialist schemes for giving people free goodies is not. Your excuse quite frankly stinks, and scares me.

Bush is on board with Gore, Kennedy. He is moving us closer to Hillarycare - only they do it piece by piece rather than one big leap.

How is he denying the democrats the issue - he's basically on board with them - he just has his on version of it.

[Judith Anne]

Drek.

[Southack]

"Of course it is unconstitutional. It is an infringement on the right to bear arms. Sadly you think banning semiauto guns for a "mean" appearance is constitutional. God save us."

God save us from little kiddies who've never READ THE ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN bill.

Here's a little NEWSFLASH: you can't post one unConstitutional sentence from the entire Assault Weapons Ban bill.

For two reasons: for one, because you haven't read it. For another, because it was reviewed by the courts and it has already passed Constitutional muster.

Heck, it doesn't even ban semi-automatic weapons. NEWSFLASH: if you aren't insane, an infant, or a felon, you can go buy a semi-automatic firearm at the gunshow or gun store of your choice (though I doubt that you've ever darkened the doors of either, save perhaps a Wal-Mart where you were picking up your laundry supplies).

So that's my challenge to you, young one, come back to this thread when you can post ONE UNCONSTITUIONAL SENTENCE from the actual text of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban bill.

And here's my bet: you'll post everything BUT such a sentence.