[Republican_Strategist]

Bush killed a CO2 rule in California? Larry Elder wrote a good column on how Bush contradicted himself and agreed to price controls. Bush pledged money to help people pay their bills too. Price controls -- bad idea whether temporary or permanent

I was unimpressed by Bush’s tax cut. It increased the burden on those making over $100,000 and cut 6 million ‘low income’ families. He played right into the hands of class warfare warriors. There was no real reform. It was just slight marginal reductions and it was extremely back loaded.

Bush has increased military spending and he has given the military pay raises. This article shows he is still allowing Clinton’s policy of admitting faggots into the military. Keeping women in combat. Bush didn’t garner my support either by trumpeting that we dropped more food than bombs in Afghanistan.

Bush federalized airline security - he allowed the government to take over a private industry! Even Sean Hannity admitted failure. Newsmax.com Commentary - President George W. Bush must be preoccupied with overseas strategy, because he has allowed his administration to take a politically disastrous position against the arming of airline pilots.

Graham is not "my beloved." You still avoid the fact Bush supports Clinton's gun ban. Your beloved Clinton?

Bush ordered Ashcroft to state the Second Amendment protects an individual right? Then why does he support a Clinton ban them? Why isn't he repealing unconstitutional gun laws? Actions speak louder than words.

I don't bother reading the N.Y. Times. I visit Times Watch.

[Southack]

"Bush federalized airline security - he allowed the government to take over a private industry! Even Sean Hannity admitted failure. Newsmax.com Commentary - President George W. Bush must be preoccupied with overseas strategy, because he has allowed his administration to take a politically disastrous position against the arming of airline pilots."

Newsmax got it wrong. The first provision to ARM PILOTS was in the bill that federalized (read: government took over) airport security workers.

Either Bush could have been anti-gun by vetoing that bill, or Bush could have been claimed to have been nationalizing entire industries by his numerous critics, but no rational person would claim that he was BOTH, since the two things were IN THE SMAE BILL!

[Southack]

"Bush killed a CO2 rule in California? Larry Elder wrote a good column on how Bush contradicted himself and agreed to price controls. Bush pledged money to help people pay their bills too. Price controls -- bad idea whether temporary or permanent"

No, Bush killed a NATIONAL co2 rule, the rule that required electricity producers to meet HIGHER CO2 standards if they replaced old equipment. So they weren't replacing old equipment. You do the math.

[Southack]

"I was unimpressed by Bush’s tax cut."

Gee, so that makes it unConservative?!

No one in the entire HISTORY OF THE WORLD has ever managed to pass a $1.3 Trillion Dollar tax cut, but Bush did.

Tax cut. Tax cut. Tax cut. That must really piss off the 1% of the radical right that hates Bush.

[Southack]

"Bush has increased military spending and he has given the military pay raises."

Hmmmm, yet in post after post you criticize Bush as being "no Conservative"...

[Southack]

"This article shows he is still allowing Clinton’s policy of admitting faggots into the military. Keeping women in combat. Bush didn’t garner my support either by trumpeting that we dropped more food than bombs in Afghanistan."

Um, you may not have noticed, but WHOMEVER we are putting into combat seems to be working out pretty well for us. Certainly the Iraqis and Afghanis have seemed to have lost their zest for combat against us.

Oh, and since when is it a bad thing to show our overwhleming American compassion by feeding the starving? So we dropped more food than bombs, and that upsets you?!

Sheesh, we clearly dropped *enough* bombs, as the Taliban is no longer in power in Afghanistan, and Hussein's statues have fallen in Baghdad.