Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH BLUNDERS ARE HARD TO KEEP UP WITH
NewsWithViews.com ^ | May 1, 2003 | Pastor Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 05/13/2003 11:50:17 PM PDT by Republican_Strategist

BUSH BLUNDERS ARE HARD TO KEEP UP WITH

 

 

By Pastor Chuck Baldwin

May 12, 2003

NewsWithViews.com

The foibles and follies of this administration are too numerous to count. With the exception of Monica Lewinsky, they rival anything in the previous administration. Of course, most neocons refuse to notice. Therefore, this column will also be ignored.

However, for those who are interested in the truth, here are some of the latest examples of Bush's blunders:

*Bush threw his support behind a liberal Republican who supports increased taxes, abortion and additional gun control to be a Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate. That man is Illinois Governor Jim Edgar. Thankfully, Edgar decided to not seek the nomination, but that didn't stop Bush from doing his best to send another liberal to Washington, D.C. Next, watch for Bush to do the same thing in California.

*Bush continues his support for the Clinton-Gore gun ban enacted back in 1994. Despite objections from gun groups, including the National Rifle Association, the President is determined to re-institute the so-called "assault weapons" ban that is scheduled to sunset next year. So much for Bush being "pro-gun."

*As Commander-In-Chief, President Bush has the authority to establish guidelines and policies for our nation's military. When Bill Clinton became President, he implemented the infamous "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy allowing homosexuals to serve in the U.S. armed forces. Bush has continued that policy. Clinton also introduced women to front-line combat roles. And true to form, Bush continues this reprehensible Clinton policy. In fact, one would be extremely hard-pressed to find any Clinton policy that Bush has reversed! I can't think of a single one.

*NAFTA and GATT came into existence early in the Clinton administration. Bush continues those polices and even wants to expand them. He has proposed expanding this agreement throughout the Americas and is now calling for a Mideast Free Trade agreement. Say good-bye to more American jobs; say hello to more foreign goods and to more foreign workers.

*Bush is determined to oversee the creation of a Palestinian state. After sending American soldiers to fight and die in an undeclared war against Iraq, Bush wants to create another such country by giving the P.L.O. radicals their own nation. Clinton wanted to do the same thing, of course, but was shouted down by conservatives. Today, those same conservatives sit mute and dumb as Bush sets about to finish what Clinton started.

*Speaking of finishing what Clinton started, Bush successfully created the Department of Homeland Security and the totalitarian-laced USA Patriot Act. There is an even more egregious version currently worming its way into law. All this was the brainchild of Bill Clinton, of course. However, he could not accomplish his pernicious plans because conservatives and Republicans would not support them. Now they do.

*Bush is likely to invoke Executive Privilege in order to continue the cover-up about what he and other top government leaders knew prior to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Some thirty days prior to the attacks, Bush reportedly received a CIA Intelligence Report which warned, "The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning." More details are leaking out almost daily.

A Democratic Presidential contender, Senator Bob Graham of Florida, says Bush knows much more than he is telling and is demanding that the administration come clean about what really took place. Before that happens, however, Bush will claim Executive Privilege and the truth will be covered up once again.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: lamebrainedidiocy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 561-576 next last
To: ArneFufkin
One or the other. Or, STFU. Nobody is impressed by righteous indignation around here anymore, put up or go away.

Righteous indignation raised to a new level!
So let it be written, so let it be done!!

461 posted on 05/14/2003 4:02:09 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
At what point do we consider this person a disruptor? I long ago made my decision. He is now supporting this assinine Baldwin article. Bah!
462 posted on 05/14/2003 4:02:40 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Don't worry. He's already promised that on May 1, 2004, he will join us in our support for Bush and get him elected.

We're just suppose to forget every single thing he's said about Bush before that day!
463 posted on 05/14/2003 4:04:54 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: michigander
The irony is a little feeble.
464 posted on 05/14/2003 4:07:50 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You did know I am the most hated liar on FR, didn't you? Todd himself said so.


Naw....... You meant "LAIR" didn't you..... LOL
465 posted on 05/14/2003 4:08:41 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple
At which point he will then take credit and spam the threads with proof that he is responsible for Bush winning. Yada yada yada.
466 posted on 05/14/2003 4:10:14 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: deport
Oh, yes, I did. Thank you for correcting that.

Still waiting...

How long should we wait?
467 posted on 05/14/2003 4:10:19 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
He's going to unload an Adobe Acrobat file with timelines, charts and neat fonts.
468 posted on 05/14/2003 4:11:40 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin; Howlin
No. We will get a reply with about 756 links to non-related storied that somehow prove that person's point.

Meanwhile, I have a question. If Free Republic is the most intelligent forum on the net, what in the world do those other losers discuss?

469 posted on 05/14/2003 4:14:25 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
The irony is a little feeble.

Depending on ones ability to have some else Shutted "TFU".

470 posted on 05/14/2003 4:14:38 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: michigander
someone else...
471 posted on 05/14/2003 4:16:49 PM PDT by michigander (Pardon the typo...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How long should we wait?


Oh maybe until one of his buds can send him a mail with something to say.....

But on the other hand I"ve heard something about 'hell freezing over'....

Really he's not worth it.....
472 posted on 05/14/2003 4:18:33 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: deport
I'd really appreciate it if you'd look at his last post and point out my LIE in there.
473 posted on 05/14/2003 4:19:38 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How long should we wait?

Until he learns some rudimentary grammar and spelling?

474 posted on 05/14/2003 4:20:26 PM PDT by TomServo (Bring Back Illbay!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: Republican_Strategist
BTW, your boy forgot to tell the faithful he was a pastor with this piece of Sh$t! I took it off his own website...there's a lot more of this rubbish to be thrown out on this trashheap.
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com

Is Bush the Antichrist?
By Chuck Baldwin

April 12, 2002


During the eight years of Clinton's presidency, I was repeatedly asked, "Chuck, do you think Bill Clinton is the antichrist?" (Of course, I answered no.) Therefore, it is more than interesting to me that since G.W. Bush became president no one has asked if I thought he was the antichrist. Not one single person! Instead, many people attribute to Bush god-like qualities, which actually makes him a better candidate than Clinton was.

You see, one of the chief characteristics of the coming antichrist is that he appears "as an angel of light." Therefore, an obvious reprobate such as Bill Clinton is immediately disqualified. The antichrist, by very definition, is a master deceiver. He must be someone who appears as good and benevolent. The bite is in his tail not in his tongue. In reality, Bush's angelic persona makes him much more dangerous than bad boy Billy.

For example, while Clinton was in the process of appointing numerous homosexual activists to his administration, copious letters from Christian leaders such as Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, and D. James Kennedy flooded America's Christian community. Appeals for protest and resistance were heard from pulpits throughout the country. A massive media campaign began against Clinton.

Today, however, President Bush is in the process of copying Clinton's numerous appointments of open homosexuals to high positions of government, but there are no letters, no warnings from pulpits, and no media campaigns opposing it. Just the opposite. Bush is being defended, lauded, and glorified for everything he does, no matter how unconstitutional or unscriptural it might be.

When Clinton only talked of legalizing embryonic stem cell research, he was castigated and condemned. Bush actually made the procedure legal, and yet, he was praised and honored. Clinton was denigrated when he tried to convince Israel to give up land for peace. Now, Bush is in the process of actually trying to create an independent Palestinian state for Israel's enemies (with Jerusalem as its capital, no less), yet continues to receive glowing adulation. If Clinton even suggested that America's immigration laws might need to be liberalized, he was denounced in the harshest terms; but Bush can actually grant limited amnesty to thousands of illegal aliens, and there is not the faintest whisper of protest.

Do you recall how Clinton was criticized for the "low lifes" he invited to the White House? Well, Bush recently invited wild man rocker, Ozzie Osbourne, to the White House. Have you heard any notable Christian leader take Bush to task for that?

You remember Ozzie Osbourne, don't you? He is the former front man for the heavy metal band, Black Sabbath. He is famous for stage antics such as biting the heads off birds and bats. His abuse of drugs and alcohol are also well known. Furthermore, Ozzie Osbourne desecrated The Alamo by pissing all over it. In spite of this, George W. Bush is said to be one of Osbourne's biggest fans. As such, Osbourne was recently invited to the White House for dinner. Have you heard any criticism of Bush for this?

Obviously, I do not believe President Bush is the antichrist any more than I believed Bill Clinton was. However, I do believe that Bush possesses more deceptive qualities than Clinton did and, therefore, is more dangerous. I also now understand more clearly how even "the elect" can be deceived. Bush' s acceptance by the overwhelming majority of Christian people proves the country is ready for the antichrist, whoever he is.

© Chuck Baldwin



Back to Chuck's "The Bush Record" page
Back to Home Page

475 posted on 05/14/2003 4:20:55 PM PDT by carlo3b (Freepers are just good folks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
Well, I got all confused; it has posted to me on another thread -- something having nothing to do with my alleged lies.

So I guess once again he's not going to be able to deliver.

I am SO surprised.
476 posted on 05/14/2003 4:22:21 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Exactly.

And check out the people on that thread who AGREED with Baldwin.
477 posted on 05/14/2003 4:23:02 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: michigander
The problem might be with your understanding of "indignant". That denotes victimization, insult, oppression, grievence, unfair treatment. I was communicating contempt, annoyance, disrespect and ridicule.

You fell a little short, you're not really what we're looking for but we'll keep your name on file and keep you in mind if something appropriate opens up in the future.

478 posted on 05/14/2003 4:23:36 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Republican_Strategist
Bush is a republican. He is not a conservative. I can no longer support him.

Richard W.

479 posted on 05/14/2003 4:28:22 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
we'll keep your name on file...

Of that I have no doubt.

480 posted on 05/14/2003 4:30:35 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 561-576 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson