Skip to comments.
BUSH BLUNDERS ARE HARD TO KEEP UP WITH
NewsWithViews.com ^
| May 1, 2003
| Pastor Chuck Baldwin
Posted on 05/13/2003 11:50:17 PM PDT by Republican_Strategist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 561-576 next last
To: TLBSHOW
Why am I not surprised you'd use that as a source.......almost everything you link is packed with lies.
Not that that matters to YOUR agenda here on FR.
221
posted on
05/14/2003 7:48:21 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: ModernDayCato
I'm not sure, but you sure got the standard Puchannanite mantra down....
To: kegler4
Like the graphic?
To: The Coopster
Pardon? I'm not familiar with Bushbot slang.
To: TLBSHOW
And actually, that is NOT the one I was referring to. ALL of his columns are packed with lies, not that you'd know the difference.
225
posted on
05/14/2003 7:49:19 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: ModernDayCato
Oh, that's all me. Se my post 219, as it seems as though I wrote it with exactly you in mind.
Done reading it? Point proven.
To: Republican_Strategist
Bush is likely to invoke Executive Privilege in order to continue the cover-up about what he and other top government leaders knew prior to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.I stopped right here..
227
posted on
05/14/2003 7:51:23 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: Howlin
228
posted on
05/14/2003 7:53:16 AM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: The Coopster
CHOOSE YOUR BATTLES WISELY? What exactly are you waiting for?
Why not take your battles in order of the Amendments to our Constitution? How about 1 and 2? They're both under attack, and your President (whom I unfortunately voted for and contributed to) supports those attacks?
Which battles are you waiting for?
Oh, and since you've already moved to personal attacks rather than defending your position, I'd just like to add that you don't seem like much of a Conservative to me.
To: Howlin
his stories are filled with truth
Bush is determined to oversee the creation of a Palestinian state. After sending American soldiers to fight and die in an undeclared war against Iraq, Bush wants to create another such country by giving the P.L.O. radicals their own nation. Clinton wanted to do the same thing, of course, but was shouted down by conservatives. Today, those same conservatives sit mute and dumb as Bush sets about to finish what Clinton started.
Chuck Baldwin
230
posted on
05/14/2003 7:56:05 AM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: Republican_Strategist
So you would rather have one of the democratic candidates in office???
To: Republican_Strategist
Short article, given the headline of too numerous to keep up with.
232
posted on
05/14/2003 7:57:36 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
To: Republican_Strategist
What a load of horse pucky.
Bush has outsmarted his opponents at every turn. If you and your preacher friend think that you can get a candidate elected that holds your views, you are living in Neverland. It "ain't gonna happen."
We got where we are by incrementalism and that is the only way we will get back to where we belong. Be patient and re-elect President George W. Bush.
233
posted on
05/14/2003 7:58:34 AM PDT
by
legman
("If God is for us, who can be against us?")
To: Republican_Strategist
Would a Democrat do better?
To: TLBSHOW
We all know you believe Bush is the AntiChrist; you also believe he'a traitor, in bed with terrorist, pushing a gay agenda, a liberal just like Bill Clinton, and anti-family, among other things.
As I have said before, keep posting that tripe; it makes you more and more irrelevant.
235
posted on
05/14/2003 8:00:09 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Republican_Strategist; Mo1
The article was written by a complainer and whiner. No matter *what* President Bush does, he'd find some fault in it. Same with you it would appear.
Perhaps you should choose a topic and stick to it on one thread rather than lump every issue together and expect complete discussion in one post.
I'm sure you *never* voted for Bush in 2000.
To: ModernDayCato
Umm, you started the whole bushbot thing here today.
And it's obvious that you are the exact type of person I was referring to. So, I'll just add your name to the list of people that I'll just chuckle at, and move on. Although no promises; there are a few who I post to when I can't take it any more.
To: ModernDayCato
Did I get the standard Bushbot mantras right? Yes, very good work. You earned a solid "A".
To: Republican_Strategist
Hmmm... I was going to flame you like everybody else, but you have some good points. We NEED to bitch. We NEED to flame the administration. We need to hold their feet to the fire. We need to come on as strong as possible to hold them to conservative values and keep the 'triangulating' to a minimum. I will vote for him in the end, and I think he's a great president, and I think he will be able to leave a strong conservative legacy in the second term, but that does NOT mean I have to say "Oh that's ok" when he kisses up to mexico and encourages border invasion, etc.
239
posted on
05/14/2003 8:03:57 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of American Anger)
To: dalebert
Seems someone is regretting their vote for Bush in 2000. I wonder if they wish they had voted for Gore, instead? Nader? What wonderful changes Nader and Gore could have made for America. Wouldn't we be better off, today?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 561-576 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson