Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Resuming ISR Flights Near North Korea
The NavLog ^ | 5/03 | Sherman

Posted on 05/13/2003 2:16:40 PM PDT by pabianice

In March, the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea fired its second missile in two weeks from Sinsang-ri over the East Sea. The first test launch in February failed due to faulty parts, according to the Japanese Defense Ministry. The tests were believed timed to coincide with the large-scale South Korea-U.S. joint military drill being held in March, and they coincided with increased tensions along the peninsula and the recent interception of a US E-3 aircraft by DPRK aircraft. In February, another North Korean jet violated the West Sea border with the South.

Nonetheless, E-3 ISR flights are scheduled to continue off North Korea, according to US military sources, and policymakers have reportedly rejected the idea of sending an armed fighter escort. According to The Washington Post, the US and its allies in the area have reluctantly accepted the fact that, short of full war, the DPRK cannot be stopped from producing nuclear weapons. With latest estimates now suggesting the DPRK’s uranium enrichment technology to be “decrepit,” strategy has reportedly switched to keeping them from selling the few weapons they are likely to be able to make within the foreseeable future. The “total red line” for the US would be the sale of nuclear weapons material to the US’ enemies, according to Rep. Mark S. Kirk (R-Ill.). Adding to a non-confrontational stance is the surprising message to Washington from the new South Korean president, Roh Moo Hyun, saying his government “would rather have a nuclear North Korea than a chaotic collapse of the government there.”

North Korea had sandbagged the Bush administration in October by revealing that it had been pursuing a program to produce highly enriched uranium and in recent months, North Korea has taken a series of steps escalating the dispute with the US, including conducting missile tests and intercepting US ISR aircraft. According to the Post, the Pentagon is now taking care that future ISR flights will not be surprised, as “…advanced detection systems [such as AEGIS, AWACS, or U-2 aircraft] will be trained on the area to detect the approach of any North Korean aircraft.”

(Excerpt) Read more at navlog.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: awac; awak; intelligence; isr; northkorea; reconnaissance; surveillance
US flights by E-3 aircraft will continue off the coast of North Korea


1 posted on 05/13/2003 2:16:41 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice
E-3 ISR flights are scheduled to continue off North Korea

I'll bet they meant P-3. E-3 doesn't do ISR, it does R and C-cubed. In either event, I hope they provide F-15s, F-16s, F-18s, and/or F-14s as escorts. NK has been known to shoot down US aircraft, and attack US ships, near but outside, its territory.

2 posted on 05/13/2003 4:33:32 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

aaahhh my eyes!, ah much better.
3 posted on 05/13/2003 4:37:56 PM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Related Programs
Airborne Digital Audio Recording System [ADARS]
BIG SAFARI
COBRA BALL
COBRA EYE
CONSTANT PHOENIX
OC-135 Open Skies
RIVET AMBER
RIVET BALL
RIVET BRASS
RIVET CARD
RIVET QUICK
4 posted on 05/13/2003 4:47:34 PM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: green team 1999
Yes an R/C-135 of various stripes, are also used, but they aren't E-3s. I took a single character error to be more likely than, E-3 when P-3 meant(although strictly speaking it would be an EP-3), than E-3 when RC-135 was meant. Either way, RC-135 or EP-3, I want 'em escorted. RC-135 might be better in this regard, as it's speed matches that of the fighters somewhat better, and that same speed complicates interception, even if not all THAT much.



5 posted on 05/13/2003 4:51:56 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson