To: GRRRRR
I wonder if four bombs in one night is enough for the Saudis to get serious about terrorists in their midsts.
3 posted on
05/12/2003 4:25:33 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
No.
4 posted on
05/12/2003 4:27:18 PM PDT by
Dog
(Some days you're the dog, and some days you're the hydrant.)
To: Dog Gone
~~~I wonder if four bombs in one night is enough for the Saudis to get serious about terrorists in their midsts. ~~~
My first thought was.....who's your new best friend, Saudi Arabia?
7 posted on
05/12/2003 4:28:42 PM PDT by
justshe
To: Dog Gone
I'm sure this will all be worked around in such a manner so that W's landing on the Lincoln is to blame.
To: Dog Gone
Saudi Arabia is a terrorist state.
24 posted on
05/12/2003 4:39:56 PM PDT by
tomahawk
To: Dog Gone
I wonder if four bombs in one night is enough for the Saudis to get serious about terrorists in their midsts. Depends on who planted the bombs. If it was the House of Saud, or their paramilitary arm (Al-Qaeda), not a chance.
70 posted on
05/12/2003 5:35:13 PM PDT by
steveegg
("I have instructions to tell you that our relations have been degraded." - WH official to French)
To: Dog Gone
Do we have any evidence that the Saudis are NOT the controllers of Al Qaeda?
I have lots of evidence that Saudi Arabia is the sine qua non of Al Qaeda.
105 posted on
05/12/2003 8:39:05 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Wheat is Murder! (Tilling slaughters worms.....))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson