Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's missing billions and link to al-Qaida
The Guardian | April 16th, 2003 | Julian Borger

Posted on 05/12/2003 8:55:10 AM PDT by Gabrielle Reilly

Saddam's missing billions and link to al-Qaida

Julian Borger in Washington Wednesday April 16, 2003 The Guardian

In the days before the fall of Baghdad, and the explosion of looting on the streets of the capital, a far more damaging form of looting was already under way as Iraqi bank accounts were ransacked and millions of dollars were transferred into private accounts abroad, Middle Eastern banking sources said yesterday. The flurry of transfers that have been spotted, going mainly through Europe to accounts in Jordanian and Palestinian banks, are thought to be the tip of a vast financial iceberg, kept afloat by Saddam Hussein, his family and his regime for more than two decades.

US investigators are scrambling to track down the missing money, estimated at between $5bn and $40bn (£3.2m and £25.bn), but some financial experts believe much of it has gone for good, and may have slipped into the hands of extremist groups such as al-Qaida.

One official who has seen reports from Middle Eastern banks told the Guardian he had seen details of at least five transfers of between $100,000 and $1m going to a single bank whose name he provided but did not want published.

"We saw it pick up right at the beginning of the shooting war. Then it really peaked the day before and the day of the fall of Saddam's statue [in Baghdad]. We haven't really seen anything since," the official said.

"My impression is there is a lot more going on, because this is not something we were looking for particularly. It just went across our radar. And as far as I know there is nothing illegal about the transfers."

Officials in Washington are worried that Iraq's highly centralised economy makes it particularly vulnerable to asset-stripping.

One Middle Eastern banking expert, who did not want to be named, criticised the Bush administration for failing to set up an interim fund that would have formally taken ownership of Iraqi state banks and other institutions, stemming the haemorrhage of funds.

"What you've got is special forces going through documents and when they come to bank accounts they just stick them in a box for people to look at later. Meanwhile, they're being emptied of funds," the expert said.

Passwords

The transfers could have been completed by anyone with access to the right bank account details and passwords.

In the cases cited, instructions for the transactions were sent by telephone, email or fax to correspondent banks in Europe with counterparts in Iraq. Once in private accounts the money can easily be converted into untraceable commodities such as gold and diamonds.

John Fawcett, an investigator who co-wrote a study last year - Sources of Revenue for Saddam and Sons - for the Coalition for International Justice said the transfers could be made by trustees appointed by the Iraqi leadership in Switzerland, Liechtenstein and other banking capitals.

In some cases, he said, the same middlemen were being used by al-Qaida, and other extremist groups, who may now have access to the Iraqi money. Mr Fawcett said: "These trustees have no protection now. They're open to one of these groups contacting them and saying transfer the money now there's no one looking, and if they say they can't, they're open to pressure."

Calculations

Mr Fawcett, who is investigating the funding of al-Qaida for the New York law firm Kreindler & Kreindler on behalf of families of September 11 victims, has tried to calculate how much money the Iraqi regime hid in foreign bank accounts by estimating how much revenue it took in from illegal oil sales and other smuggling operations, and subtracting the costs of maintaining its power and standard of living.

He believes some of the higher estimates of the missing Saddam fortune may be an exaggeration and puts it at somewhere between $5bn and $10bn.

The general accounting office of the US Congress has produced a report estimating that the Iraqi government raised more than $6bn between 1997 and 2001 from various smuggling enterprises.

Much of it was earned by selling oil to Turkey and Syria in deals outside the UN-run oil for food programme.

The Washington Post quoted a senior US treasury official as saying that since the start of the war, the Bush administration had tracked down about $1.2bn in illicit Iraqi assets around the world which have not yet been legally blocked.

In addition the $1.7bn frozen after the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 is expected to be handed over to a new Iraqi government.

Apart from Saddam, the person who knew most about the regime's clandestine financial network was his half-brother Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti. He may well be dead. According to some reports he was killed when his farm, west of Baghdad, was bombed on Friday.

As the Iraqi ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva for 10 years until 1998, Tikriti was responsible for much of the family's finances abroad.

He returned to Switzerland last autumn when American intentions towards Iraq were already clear, in what some Iraqi observers believed was a mission aimed at making contingency banking plans in the event of Saddam's fall.

Tikriti slipped out of the country in October after demands that he should be arrested and charged with crimes against humanity.

If he was killed, many of Saddam's biggest financial secrets may have died with him.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedaandiraq; iraq; iraqifreedom; linktoalqaida; missingbillions; moneytrail; saddam; saddaminc; usdollars
Ok. Know it is a little dated but since so many think that al-Qaida funding has long been shut down... just an example of possible resources available around the world.
1 posted on 05/12/2003 8:55:10 AM PDT by Gabrielle Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gabrielle Reilly
If it's true the Bush admin could have taken control of the Iraqi banks before some of the money was transfered and didn't, it's a huge screw up.
2 posted on 05/12/2003 9:38:15 AM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
And when was that "takeover" supposed to have occurred?
3 posted on 05/12/2003 9:45:42 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
I'll join in your question.

waiting....
4 posted on 05/12/2003 9:56:16 AM PDT by cyncooper ("You and I will not live in an age of terror. We will live in an age of liberty." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
From what I hear we were scheduled to shut their banks down with iWarriors, but we learned that it would bring down the whole French ATM system at the same time (this is no BS, but someone with Lexus/Nexus should look for the reference).

Damn Cheese Eatin' Surrender Monkeys

5 posted on 05/12/2003 10:07:00 AM PDT by Woodman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Woodman
That's interesting. Note: We're on the money trail, make no mistake. Could it be that the trail blazed since the shooting war will lead the investigators to nab the terrorists?

I object to the lament by the poster who pointed immediately to the Bush Administration as having blown something, and not focused on the growing evidence of Al Qaeda ties to Iraq, which I have no doubt exist, and time is only providing more and more evidence to prove it.
6 posted on 05/12/2003 10:38:48 AM PDT by cyncooper ("You and I will not live in an age of terror. We will live in an age of liberty." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
RE: Money trail.

One particular sentence from the Lincoln speech jumped out at me: "The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror. We have removed an ally of al-Qaeda, and cut off a source of terrorist funding."

I don't think I've heard anyone comment about this statement from Bush. It seems that President Bush is more than hinting that we've got significant money trail evidence. Money is fungible. If Saddam was funding al-Qaeda in even modest amounts he was in violation of the 1991 ceasefire and can be held accountable for 911.
7 posted on 05/12/2003 11:01:52 AM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff
>>>>> If Saddam was funding al-Qaeda in even modest amounts he was in violation of the 1991 ceasefire and can be held accountable for 911.>>>>>


They just have past a judgement several days ago that Saddam and Bin Laden were accountable for 9/11 and money (if they ever get it) would be awarded.
8 posted on 05/12/2003 11:09:18 AM PDT by Gabrielle Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Realisticly, it is really difficult to track all money transfers around the world for many reason's, such as the complications mentioned with computer systems etc. There is much money traded in commodities such as diamonds, drugs, illegal weapons, and cash, etc. Sometimes we forget, even though America is mighty and powerful, we do not have supernatural powers. :)
9 posted on 05/12/2003 11:14:58 AM PDT by Gabrielle Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gabrielle Reilly
Yes, I've seen the stories about the court case. I hadn't really been thinking about that angle so much. My understanding is that the court ruled mostly on circumstantial evidence. If hard evidence is released by the U.S. government, then the flood of damage suits would be overwhelming. I wonder how that would effect what we're trying to achieve in Iraq.
10 posted on 05/12/2003 11:16:06 AM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Woodman
>>>>>>>>>but we learned that it would bring down the whole French ATM system at the same time >>>>>>>

And the problem with that? LOL
11 posted on 05/12/2003 11:16:37 AM PDT by Gabrielle Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff
>>>>>>If hard evidence is released by the U.S. government, then the flood of damage suits would be overwhelming. I wonder how that would effect what we're trying to achieve in Iraq. >>>>>

I guess the odds of getting that money is not thought to be good. If a kitty of money was available from Saddam and Bin Laden, there probably will be a flood of suits. I think the money would have to be from their personal kitties and not from Iraq money, but I am only taking an educated guess on that. Does anyone have more info on that?
12 posted on 05/12/2003 11:22:04 AM PDT by Gabrielle Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson