To: Blood of Tyrants
She should be fully protected to practice her pagan religion as she see's fit, as long as it doesn't cause physical harm to another person. I don't think you see the point. She is allowed to practice her "religion". Acording to the law, the Schools can encourage it.
If one entire religion is disallowed because one child is 'uncomfortable' then ALL religons should be banned.
Why should all religions be banned because ONE person is uncomfortable? That ONE person needs to get a grip! "The needs of the many out weigh the needs of the one". Tell me why make 1300 people uncomfortable because of 1 complaint?
23 posted on
05/12/2003 9:04:58 AM PDT by
Zavien Doombringer
(If I keep my eyes on Jesus, I could walk on water - Audio Adrenaline)
To: Zavien Doombringer
{Why should all religions be banned because ONE person is uncomfortable? That ONE person needs to get a grip!}
According to the rules of political correctness, liberals have a right not to be offended.
30 posted on
05/12/2003 9:11:21 AM PDT by
Kuksool
To: Zavien Doombringer
You apparently didn't get the sarcastic tone of my post. I'll use the </sarcasm> symbol the next time.
This is just another blatant attempt to stick the federal government in where it doesn't belong. You have freedom of religon, not freedom FROM religion. Teachers shouldn't be proselitizing but neither should they be prohibited from saying a silent prayer or wearing religions symbols.
33 posted on
05/12/2003 9:11:42 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson