Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Source: No Evidence of Derby Cheating
Cincinnati.Com ^ | May 12,2003 | RICHARD ROSENBLATT

Posted on 05/12/2003 8:08:26 AM PDT by yankeedame

May 12, 10:53 AM EDT

Source: No Evidence of Derby Cheating

By By RICHARD ROSENBLATT
AP Racing Writer

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) -- Churchill Downs stewards pored over scores of photos and videotape of jockey Jose Santos this weekend, but were unable to find any evidence he cheated in winning the Kentucky Derby aboard Funny Cide, a racing official said Monday on condition of anonymity.

The stewards also searched the racetrack and turf course where Funny Cide and Santos crossed for postrace ceremonies and did not find any illegal device, the source said.

Santos met 90 minutes Monday morning with stewards who are investigating whether he held something in his hand besides his whip when he crossed the finish line on May 3. A photograph prompted the inquiry.

The investigation is focusing "most particularly on the actions" of Santos at the race, said chief steward Bernie Hettel, joined by stewards Rick Leigh and Jack Middleton at the meeting.

When the meeting ended, Santos, along with his lawyer and agent, drove away without comment.

"Conversations between Mr. Santos and his attorney and the stewards have been completed," said John Asher, Churchill Downs' vice president of racing communications. "I would not draw any conclusions. This was part of the process. The stewards have to sit down and talk about a few things."

Asked if any decisions had been reached, Asher said: "They did not advise me of that."

He added that Santos will attend an afternoon news conference.

Funny Cide, a 12-1 shot, beat favorite Empire Maker by 1 3/4 lengths to become the first gelding to win the Derby since 1929.

Stewards decided to investigate after The Miami Herald published the photo, along with a story. A reporter from the Herald brought the image to the attention of the stewards Thursday night.

The Getty Images photo, which ran in several newspapers the morning after the race, depicts a dark area in the space between Santos' right hand and his whip. It is unclear whether the area is a shadow, the green background of another jockey's silks or something else.

Leigh told the Herald the photo looks "very suspicious." AP photos did not show anything else in Santos' right hand.

Race replays show that Santos switched the whip from his right hand to his left and back to his right during the final three-sixteenths of a mile. Funny Cide's trainer Barclay Tagg said it would take a special jockey to pull off the feat while carrying something else.

"If you can move the reins and move the sticks (whip) and still get rid of something you have to be a pretty good juggler," the trainer said.

The stewards have ultimate authority over race results.

Funny Cide could be disqualified if it is determined Santos carried something illegal, such as a battery or hand-held electrical device to shock the horse into running faster.

Kentucky Racing Commission rules do not prohibit a jockey from holding an object besides his whip, other than those specifically prohibited.

A Derby winner has been disqualified only once - Dancer's Image in 1968 after he was given banned medication. Forward Pass was declared the winner.

The inquiry might not have an impact on Funny Cide's preparation for Saturday's Preakness Stakes, but it seems to be taking a toll on Tagg. Usually friendly, he was curt Sunday morning outside his barn at Belmont Park, declining to speak to reporters.

"I can't do anything; I've got no time," said Tagg, who planned to be in Albany for Monday's festivities, which will culminate at Saratoga later in the day. "I've got too much to do."

Trainer Bobby Frankel reaffirmed his decision to enter Peace Rules in the Preakness and run Empire Maker next in the Belmont Stakes on June 7.

Frankel had considered Empire Maker for the Preakness on the chance the Derby finish could change, but went back to his original plan.

"I don't think anything's going to happen," he said.

Trainer Bob Baffert, who will saddle Senor Swinger in the Preakness, came to Santos' defense.

"Those top riders like Jose, they wouldn't even think to do anything like that," the three-time Derby winner said. "That's why I was like, 'That just doesn't sound right.'

"Those top guys not only wouldn't do that, they're the first ones to turn somebody in if they see something. They'd be like, 'Hey, get out of here.' You'd have to be a moron to do something like that."

Santos won an Eclipse Award in 1988 as the nation's outstanding jockey and was the leading rider in purse earnings from 1986 to '89. This was his first Derby win, but he did ride 43-1 shot Volponi to victory in the Breeders' Cup Classic last October.

The Herald reported that Santos said he carried an object in his hand during the race and that he described it as a "cue ring" to alert an outrider to his presence. An outrider is a rider aboard a pony who can guide a thoroughbred before and after the race.

However, Santos told the Daily Racing Form that there was a misunderstanding. The jockey, who is from Chile and speaks English with a heavy accent, said he was talking about a "Q-Ray" bracelet he wears for arthritis.

Frank Carlson, the Herald's horse racing writer, told New York Racing Association vice president Bill Nader that there might have been a misunderstanding when he interviewed the jockey. Carlson's conversation with Nader was released in a statement by the NYRA at Belmont on Saturday.

Later, in a statement released by the Herald, Carlson said he went through his notes and believed he quoted the jockey accurately.

"What I wrote and what was in the newspaper is what I understood him to say," Carlson said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kentuckyderby

1 posted on 05/12/2003 8:08:26 AM PDT by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Stewards decided to investigate after The Miami Herald published the photo, along with a story. A reporter from the Herald brought the image to the attention of the stewards Thursday night.

Just a reminder, folks. This newspaper is in a Florida county that had as much trouble trying to figure out what a 'vote' is and how to count one. Maybe the reporter was confused by the jocky's butterfly grip...or something.

2 posted on 05/12/2003 8:32:54 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame; tbpiper
They should be investigating the Getty Photographer not Santos...


Here are the original AP photos



3 posted on 05/12/2003 8:42:02 AM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
Was the reporter's name "Chad" perchance?
4 posted on 05/12/2003 9:13:19 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
No cheating?? Damn, just ruined a good story.
5 posted on 05/12/2003 9:24:38 AM PDT by Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
So Santos has an object that is color-matched with the trailing jockey's jersey?
6 posted on 05/12/2003 9:27:30 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
So Santos has an object that is color-matched with the trailing jockey's jersey?

Cunning SOB. The word is "livery", not "color", btw.

7 posted on 05/12/2003 9:55:46 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I stand (just NNE) of corrected.
8 posted on 05/12/2003 9:58:53 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The photo on the right is a fake.

Look at the angle of the whip and arm. Look at the folds in the jacket. Look at the shadows along the arm. Look at the position of the armband/number worn. All of these match in the two photos. Yet the photos pretend to show two different periods in time. (Look at the background and postion of the horses.)

Also, the horses seem to be closer than normal/possible in the 2nd photo. It could be possible but the distance between them seems to indicate contact between the back jockey/horse with the back right-side of the lead horse.

9 posted on 05/12/2003 10:25:13 AM PDT by Lichgod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lichgod
If the photo on the right is a fake, then the Getty Press photo is even more of a fake, for all the same reasons.
10 posted on 05/12/2003 10:29:50 AM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lichgod
These photos are from almost the same moment, that's why the angles look similar. There's a third one from right around the same time (this is the one that caused all the trouble, but it looks like the "object" was actually just part of the trailing jockey's uniform showing through his fingers):


11 posted on 05/12/2003 11:14:05 AM PDT by The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Finally we can move on.
12 posted on 05/12/2003 11:14:42 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
If you look closely at his hand, the problem seems to be in the extremely unusual hand position. Look at the space between his index finger and his third finger. His third finger must be curved, with the fingertip touching the stick. How extremely awkward that appears. There's so much space in between those two fingers that I can see how it might have appeared that he was holding something.
13 posted on 05/12/2003 12:04:26 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
His third finger must be curved, with the fingertip touching the stick. How extremely awkward that appears. There's so much space in between those two fingers that I can see how it might have appeared that he was holding something.

If he was twirling it to go from carrying to slapping positions, it would look awkward.

14 posted on 05/12/2003 12:13:41 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lichgod
Look at the tip of the right ear of the horse that Santos is riding. It is not in the same location in both photos. What does that mean in relation to a fake photo?
15 posted on 05/12/2003 2:30:58 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Yes, yes, yes, but what does Funny Cide have to say about the whole thing?
16 posted on 05/12/2003 2:50:08 PM PDT by Luna (Evil will not triumph...God is at the helm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lichgod
The apparent "sameness" of the jockey's arm, whip, garb, etc. ie each photo above merely means that those two (and many more) photos were taken at the same time by multiple cameras from slightly different angles.
17 posted on 05/13/2003 6:24:16 AM PDT by citizen (Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson