Posted on 05/12/2003 5:22:16 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
FBI might drain Md. pond as part of its anthrax probe Spores reportedly found during Dec., Jan. searches of waters near Frederick -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Scott Shane Sun Staff Originally published May 12, 2003
------
In addition, The Washington Post, citing anonymous sources, reported yesterday that divers retrieved a "clear box" with holes that could accommodate protective biological safety gloves, as well as vials wrapped in plastic.
Scientists working with dangerous microbes often use a "glove box," a sealed container made of glass or clear plastic with glove ports fixed in place to allow the researcher to manipulate equipment without being directly exposed to the germs. Such equipment ranges from laboratory-size units of the kind used at the Army's biodefense center at Fort Detrick in Frederick to small, inexpensive "glove bags" made of flexible plastic that can be disposed of after a single use.
One person who has heard a description of the box allegedly found in the pond said last night that it was not a commercially manufactured glove box or glove bag, but rather a plastic tub with two holes in it. The source, who has spoken to FBI officials, said some investigators believe it might have been part of jury-rigged equipment used to load the anthrax spores into the envelopes later sent to two U.S. senators and several media organizations. ------------------------
(Excerpt) Read more at sunspot.net ...
I just try to "think" how I would have to do this and the pre-loaded syringe concept works best. So did they have many pre-loaded (throw-away) (1 oz) syringes?? or did they extract it through the seal of a 1 oz vial and insert it into the envelopes??
Of course the evidence is all circumstantial and a lot of it may be just coincidential, but you have to admit that it's a pretty long, interesting and intriguing list that can't be easily dismissed. I don't recall anyone coming to the defense of Scott Ritter -- the white male, ex-military weapons inspector. HF sure has a lot of fans here.
I thought it was interesting that the WP story and the stories which picked it up focused on the trivial detail of the "new theory" about how the letters were loaded, rather than the apparent bombshell that the Feds found anthrax and a makeshift glove box four months ago in a pond based on a lead from Steve Hatfill's bioterrorism novel. And what I infer from that is that the story was crafted to plant a talking point in public consciousness, while somehow avoiding the question of why they haven't arrested this man or empanelled a grand jury to put him in the hot seat. This is a pattern we've seen again and again in this case. Remember "Greendale School"? Remember Hatfill's press conferences, and the photos of Hatfill's alleged girlfriend's alleged apartment allegedly turned over by FBI agents? Same modus operandi.
They suddenly swooped down on a junk dealer in Enterprise, Alabama and began to search every inch of his business including the pleasant job of digging up the septic tank.
I was watching this on TV with another grad student and we both laughed. It was so obvious listening to the owner that he was not the mad bomber that it was literally funny. Of course it turned out he had nothing to do with it and the only evidence was that the typewriter used to write some letter had once been in his junk.
Of course they have to check out all leads but this was ridiculous. The really do appear to be incompetent sometimes.
That's because this is just a made-up, BS talking point which is being disseminated right now to give a booster shot to the "domestic" theory of the anthrax. A few weeks ago, as the war in Iraq was winding down, there was another flurry of anthrax-related news stories with the same basic "take home" message. Supposedly, US Army scientists had discovered, after 18 months of trials, that the anthrax sent with the mail threats following 9/11 could have been weaponized simply by a private individual, without the resources of the state.
Now, ask yourself what might be the purpose of pushing this line now, in the wake of the resolution of the Iraq situation. I suggest the answer to that question is the same as the answer to the following: Why did the administration go to such lengths to sell us the story that we were personally targeting Saddam during the Iraq campaign? Who will be arrested first, Hatfill or Saddam? Or will neither of them ever be arrested?
They turned to the hot topic of anthrax. The powder in the letter mailed to Senator Daschle's office had been found to be potent, prompting officials to suggest its source was likely an expert capable of producing the bacteria in large amounts. Tenet said, "I think it's AQ" meaning al Qaeda. "I think there's a state sponsor involved. It's too well thought out, the powder's too well refined. It might be Iraq, it might be Russia, it might be a renegade scientist," perhaps from Iraq or Russia.Scooter Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, said he also thought the anthrax attacks were state sponsored. "We've got to be careful on what we say." It was important not to lay it on anyone now. "If we say it's al Qaeda, a state sponsor may feel safe and then hit us thinking they will have a bye because we'll blame it on al Qaeda."
"I'm not going to talk about a state sponsor," Tenet assured them.
"It's good that we don't," said Cheney, "because we're not ready to do anything about it."
Bush at War, Bob Woodward, p. 248 (account of NSC meeting, 10/17/01)
Hardly. It's the administration that is BS-ing us. The FBI is just a tool. And if you want to understand why the administration is BS-ing us about the anthrax letters, it would be helpful to figure out why they BS-ed us about the "decapitation strikes."
Or, to put it another way, why is it that this man is smiling...
...and this man isn't?
The meeting DID occur, it's been confirmed by the Czech govt, check the story as its developed over time. The NY Times played a role in downplaying the authenticity of the meeting, with some FALSE reporting. Go figure.
Of course you could. And that's exactly what Hatfill and the boys at Amerithrax did. They made it up. It's kind of like the "earprint" story? Remember that? We were supposed to believe that the US personally targeted Saddam Hussein because a CIA operative used special "earprint technology" to ID him entering a bunker, then spied him being med-evaced away on a gurney with an oxygen mask over his face after we plopped a barrage of forty cruise missiles on the building. Remember that story? Guess what? The government has people whose jobs are making this sh*t up, and other people whose jobs are feeding it to the willing dupes in the press. And guess who sits at the bottom of this food chain?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.