Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re: Jayson Blair - NY Times Claims Kent State Football Attendance Miscounted, Angers Many  
Daily Kent Stater via CollegeSports.com ^ | December 26, 2002 | Mike Gardner

Posted on 05/11/2003 6:57:05 PM PDT by kristinn

KENT, Ohio (U-WIRE) -- A New York Times reporter said Kent State is miscounting its football attendance. Kent State officials said he was lying.

Laing Kennedy, Kent State's athletic director, said the article's author, Jayson Blair, never even contacted the university about how the school counts its football attendance.

"It's full of inaccuracies," Kennedy said. "It's totally irresponsible and not true. It infuriates me."

Neither Blair nor various editors at The New York Times could be reached for comments after numerous attempts.

The story says the university has sponsored tailgating parties and counted those packed on flatbed trucks and sitting on lawn chairs in the parking lot as being in attendance.

In one version of the article, Blair quotes Pete Mahoney, associate athletic director who oversees marketing, as saying, "We are going to do it until someone tells us to stop." In another version of the article, the same quote was attributed to "one Kent State official."

"I never saw the article," Mahoney said. "I got a phone call after it ran. Those are not my quotes.

"We're not very happy, especially about some comments that were made. 'Flatbed trucks' never came out of my mouth. My whole objective is to get people in the stands. The gate revenue is very important."

Kennedy backed-up Mahoney's comment, stating attendance numbers are accurately reported based on people coming through the turnstiles at Dix Stadium.

"We are not free and easy with the NCAA," Kennedy said. "They are very clear on how to count attendance. We don't count tailgaters. We don't count people on flatbed trucks, and we don't count people in lawn chairs."

There are certain NCAA stipulations Division IA schools must meet to still be considered Division IA. A school must have 90 percent of its scholarships occupied, must sponsor 16 sports (six of them men's) and must have 200 scholarships. The final stipulation -- averaging 15,000 people per home game against Division IA opponents -- is still being decided upon. Kennedy said the rule has been referred to the NCAA board of directors and, if passed, will go into effect Aug. 1, 2004.

This stipulation is what concerns the university. In 2001, it was about 8,000 people short of the proposed standard, but numbers are creeping up. In 2002 it averaged 11,447 people -- a hike of close to 90 percent.

Ramifications of not meeting the requirements have not yet been settled on by the NCAA, but the ramifications for the university could be huge.

To be a full-fledged member of the Mid-American Conference, the school must sponsor football, volleyball, baseball, softball and men's and women's basketball at a Division IA status. If the football program is dropped to IAA, Kent State would lose all its MAC membership.

The athletic department is working on new and innovative marketing ideas to put more people in the stands at football games. While Kennedy admitted winning is the best way to boost attendance, he said there are ways of encouraging more participation. Mahoney said the marketing department wants to reach out more to the community and to the students. Kennedy is looking at some schedule changes in order to not directly compete with larger football powerhouses like Ohio State.

"We need to be proactive and get creative and get rid of the sacred cow that Kent State football has to be played on Saturday at 2 p.m."

Kennedy said he wants to play more games on Thursdays and Fridays and make some of the game times later in the evening.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: falsification; howellraines; jaysonblair; newyorktimes; nyt; plagiarism; thenewyorktimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Here's what the NY Times had to say today about this in their autopsy of Jayson Blair's career:

...The Daily Kent Stater, a student newspaper, published an article in December in which school officials took issue with Mr. Blair's reporting. The writer of the article, who said that he could not reach Mr. Blair because his voice-mail in box was full, then left detailed messages for The Times' sports department. No one at the paper responded to the messages.

This is a perfect example of why Howell Raines should be fired. His newspaper smears a university's football program and can't be bothered to respond at all to complaints about it.

The Times does mention that they recently interviewed Mr. Mahoney about his alleged quotes. Mr. Mahoney stated, again, he never spoke to Mr. Blair or made those remarks.

This is not just a Jayson Blair problem, this is a Howell Raines problem. Raines must go.

1 posted on 05/11/2003 6:57:06 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Raines is single-handedly sinking the Old Grey Whore.

Instead of calling for his dismissal, we should be flooding the Times with letters of support.
2 posted on 05/11/2003 7:01:35 PM PDT by WarSlut (Boycott Disney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: kristinn
"This is not just a Jayson Blair problem, this is a Howell Raines problem. Raines must go."

BINGO.
4 posted on 05/11/2003 7:03:55 PM PDT by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
If I were Jayson Blair I'd resign from the NY Times.


What, he did? never mind...

5 posted on 05/11/2003 7:04:29 PM PDT by Drango (There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binaries, and those that don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlFuller781
His heart was in the right place--that all that counts !!
6 posted on 05/11/2003 7:04:55 PM PDT by ralph rotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Hi, my friend,

Just an hour ago, I settled on the Raines-New York Times as the subject for my next column. The story about the Times stepping on Kent State like a bug in the corner is more grist for the mill. I think you'll like how I climb the ladder to Raines.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, now up FR, "Brave New Moment."

7 posted on 05/11/2003 7:06:50 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I read all ten pages of the Times online version of the article. I was left thinking that anyone who doesn't think Raines should be sacked deserves to be sacked.

The Times' problems are bigger than this fool, and bigger than Raines. But Raines is a huge part of the problem.

8 posted on 05/11/2003 7:07:43 PM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=
NYT
Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.


9 posted on 05/11/2003 7:08:07 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
"This is not just a Jayson Blair problem, this is a Howell Raines problem. Raines must go."

Firing Mr. Raines is like walking up to Stalin in 1937 and telling him he's fired. They are identical politically in almost every way.
10 posted on 05/11/2003 7:09:27 PM PDT by Beck_isright (When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; Angelwood; Marylander
In the fall of 1998, another reporter at The Times wrote that there were no demonstrations at the White House calling for Bill Clinton's impeachment.

Angelwood and Marylander, who knew better, protested in front of The Times' D.C. bureau at 17th and I Street trying to meet the reporter to tell him how wrong he was.

For their troubles, Times staffers threw eggs out the windows at Angelwood and Marylander.

11 posted on 05/11/2003 7:17:54 PM PDT by kristinn (Liberal Media is in a Quagmire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
I'm surprised Raines wasn't fired this weekend.
12 posted on 05/11/2003 7:20:13 PM PDT by kristinn (Liberal Media is in a Quagmire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I remember meeting one of the higher-ups at the New York times maybe 10 or 20 years ago because he was paying a summer visit to some influential liberals we happened to know. His name was Sidney Gruson. He was about the most contemptible man I ever had the displeasure to meet, and even my liberal friends had the same reaction to him. I asked around afterward as to why they kept him on at the Times, and the response was that the Sulzbergers thought he was terrific.

The same is true of Howell Raines. They may well fire him if problems continue to mount and circulation continues to fall, but he's doing exactly the job the Sulzbergers want. It's the present generation of Sulzbergers who are really responsible for the mess the Times has become.
13 posted on 05/11/2003 7:21:41 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WarSlut
The NY Times' circulation is down 5.3% through March. That ought to tell somebody something over there.
14 posted on 05/11/2003 7:22:11 PM PDT by kristinn (Liberal Media is in a Quagmire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I should probably have said maybe 20 or 30 years ago. I'm a bit vague as to the time when he was on the masthead, I think as Vice President.
15 posted on 05/11/2003 7:23:38 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Raines is not gay, and he rules the newsroom like a czar. But no matter how hard he cracks the whip, if the homintern at the Times revolts, he will be finished.
16 posted on 05/11/2003 7:24:41 PM PDT by Loyalist (Y'know Adrienne, I can hear you laughing at this stuff right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I'm surprised Raines wasn't fired this weekend

'Cause there is no outrage in the mainstream media.

The funny thing is that although most newspapers reprinted the NY Times article, very few have done their own independent story on the scandal. It's as if they're afraid to turn over the rocks because of what they might find in their own newsrooms. I wonder what percentage of datelines don't match expense reports. hmmmmm?

17 posted on 05/11/2003 7:25:49 PM PDT by Drango (There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binaries, and those that don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Their reporting used to be the standard. Everyone knew of their liberal bias, but the news was reliable even if you had to read between the lines alot.

Now, they have no standards. This episode proves that in spades.

18 posted on 05/11/2003 7:26:01 PM PDT by kristinn (Liberal Media is in a Quagmire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
bump
19 posted on 05/11/2003 7:26:42 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Sounds great. Add me to the list. Freakin' fishwrap.
20 posted on 05/11/2003 7:27:48 PM PDT by PianoMan (Liberate the Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson