Posted on 05/11/2003 5:29:33 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
IT NEVER rains but it pours in the forex market.
And if you were caught long on the United States dollar, there wasn't enough time to run for shelter. In just the past week, the US dollar fell 1 to 2 per cent against the euro, Japanese yen and Singapore dollar. The sudden change in mood is generally attributed to two men and a twin deficit.
The twin deficit is old hat.
America is now running the largest current account deficit in its history, totalling US$503 billion (S$876.2 billion) last year, or almost 5 per cent of the country's GDP. That is, US purchases of goods and services from the rest of the world exceeded its sales to the same group by US$503 billion.
A country in debt must eventually repay by devaluing its currency.
A contributory factor behind the current account deficit is the country's budget deficit. US President George W. Bush's proposal to cut taxes on dividends over the next decade will add up to an estimated bill of US$550 billion for the US government (the exact amount is still being debated in Congress). By boosting spending, US imports will increase and add to the current account deficit.
Forex traders also point to Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan's warning of a further fall in the inflation rate as a cause for the fall in the greenback. It raised the likelihood of another round of interest rate cuts.
Treasury Secretary John Snow didn't help matters when he appeared nonchalant about the dollar's decline. He said he was 'not particularly concerned'.
But the really intriguing question is whether the Fed has started to use unconventional weapons in preventing deflation. Morgan Stanley's Dick Berner is one economist who believes so. He suggests: 'The Fed is already quietly using another key weapon in its deflation-fighting arsenal, namely a weaker dollar... It has brought US interest rates lower than most on the planet, and in a world of single-digit returns, yield-hungry investors are looking elsewhere.'
And what the US wants, it gets.
The Fed has long indicated its awareness of the potential problems of deflation. In a widely publicised research report by Federal Reserve economists in June last year, 'Preventing Deflation: Lessons from Japan's Experience in the 1990s', they argued the lesson to be learnt from Japan was that the best way to fight deflation was to avoid it.
The danger is in being too complacent. Deflation in Japan was almost entirely unanticipated by both foreign and Japanese observers.
Federal Reserve governor Ben Bernanke's speech to the National Economists Club in Washington on Nov 21 last year laid out the broad strategy. He argues that as 'deflation is in almost all cases a side effect of a collapse of demand, the Fed should try to preserve a buffer zone for the inflation rate - that is, during normal times, it should not try to push inflation down all the way to zero'.'
The idea of maintaining an inflation buffer zone is to reduce the risk that a large and unexpected drop in demand does not tilt the economy into deflationary territory and drive interest rates to zero. So central banks should not allow the inflation rate to fall below some agreed minimum rate.
In fact, Mr Bernanke only recently renewed his call for an inflation target.
In an interview with the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on April 10, he said: 'The Fed has had considerable success in fighting inflation. Now our task is to anchor the public's and the financial markets' inflation expectations.'
A possible range he suggested for 'acceptable' inflation could be for a rise in an agreed consumer price index of between 1.5 and 2.5 per cent.
It is a testament to the resiliency and flexibility of the US economy that output continues to increase, despite disruptions by a number of unexpected events during the past two years - namely, the Sept 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the US and the Iraq war.
But the price paid is a fall in the inflation rate (excluding energy and food prices) to just 1.7 per cent.
Amber lights are likely to be flashing within the Fed.
Three methods to fight deflation have been outlined by its governors in various speeches during the past year: monetary easing, purchasing securities by the Fed, and purchasing of non-dollar denominated assets to devalue the currency.
All of these are being proposed with the objective of creating inflation or, to be more precise, of creating the expectations of inflation.
Monetary easing is the conventional weapon. But there are limits to this, given that the key short-term interest rate - the Fed funds rate - has already been reduced to 1.25 per cent, a 40-year low.
The alternative is for the Fed to purchase Treasury bonds in order to lower long-term interest rates. Mortgage rates and corporate bonds are tied to Treasuries, so bringing Treasury yields down will lower borrowing costs.
The Fed may have already made its first move by announcing its concern over a further decline in the inflation rate. Treasury bonds have rallied sharply since the Federal Reserve meeting, pushing the yield on the 10-year note down to 3.65 per cent, from 3.89 per cent.
There's an even subtler move. The disinflation warning effectively separated concerns of inflation from growth.
While traditionally, financial markets worry about inflation when there's growth; now, you can have growth without inflation.
Mr Greenspan is conditioning the markets to expect a low interest rate environment even when growth picks up. He wants to be sure inflation clears the buffer zone before interest rates start rising.
Mr Bernanke believes a weaker dollar policy can also work.
He cites the example of then-president Franklin Roosevelt devaluing the dollar against gold in 1933-34, enforced by a programme of domestic money creation.
The devaluation and the rapid increase in money supply reversed the deflationary trend. Consumer price inflation in the US rose from minus 10.3 per cent in 1932 to 3.4 per cent in 1934. He points out 'the economy grew strongly and, by the way, 1934 was one of the best years of the century for the stock market'.
The US dollar's descent smells of a premeditated move rather than just the shifting moods of forex traders.
The man was a prophet and patriot.
We look on Heinrich Ford as the leader of the growing fascisti movement in America. We admire particularly the anti-Jewish policy, which is the Bavarian Fascisti platform. We have just had his anti-Jewish articles translated and published. It is being circulated to millions throughout Germany." - Adolf Hilter
Just open a Forex account with $5-10,000 in it. Then buy the Euro on the next pullback...and make a million dollars in one year. This would have happened had you done the same at this time last year. I am not joking. We have made a killing on the Euro.
If that were true, then every Boeing employee should own his own 747.
LOLOL!!!
Dang, I wish I'd worked for Caterpiller - I'd love to be able to afford one of theose earth-mover machines.
This was not to understood in so crude literal way. In case of Boeing, the analogy would be if employees were able to afford a plane tickets.
I'll let the guys on the Boeing assembly line know that right away.
Have you ever heard of the law of competitive advantage?
I'll be darned. I did not know that. Apparently ol' Henry was quite the anti-Semite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.