Every single one of those things, except heterosexual, exist as one of many valid kinds of people. There are men who are not fathers, not husbands, not sales executives, not Republicans, not conservatives, etc.
You are sexual because you are not asexual (like fungus). Since you are sexual you are by definition heterosexual since autosexual and homosexual can't be sexual - they can't reproduce. The only reason you would have ever put heterosexual into that list is because the deviant homosexuals have decided to classify themselves based on their erotic preferences. If someone had challenged your sexual identity before the gay agenda started making so much noise, you probably would have said something like "I'm just as interested in girls as any other red blooded Cuban (or American depending on where you got "diversified") man would be.
Shalom.
They exist, their sexuality is questioned not by them, but by us. We want to simply make believe that they do not exist, in spite of the fact that homosexuality is as old as man, we think that some kind of "see no evil" attitude will make some kind of a difference.
Their sins are punishable by G*d, not by man playing the role of G*d, or the government assuming G*d's role.
My beliefs tell me that, unlike the vast majority of the people on this thread, I am to hate the sin, but love the sinner.
I don't call them "queers" (unless I am making a point), I call them sinners like many of us are sinners, I don't call them deviants, I call the behavior deviant while recognizing that in my own imperfection as a human, I engage in what may be deviant behavior, if one is to consider all sodomy deviant behavior, and I most certainly completely reject the idea that "God hates fags"...they are sinners, and He sacrificed His only begotten Son to provide sinners with a vehicle to salvation.
He wouldn't have done that unless He loved us all equally.