To: pttttt
You know...I havent followed this subject at all because it seems to me that the 9/11 highjackers were the sources of the original anthrax letters [mailed before 9/11] and that any subsequent letters were copycat mailings that killed "0".
Am I off?
8 posted on
05/11/2003 7:22:45 AM PDT by
VaBthang4
(Could someone show me one [1] Loserdopian elected to the federal government?)
To: VaBthang4
Am I off?
Yes. None of the Anthrax letters were mailed before 9/18. None of the 9/11 hijackers could have physically mailed them.
The anthrax attacks were actually much later after 9/11 than people remember; I think people probably hazily remember Bob Stevens getting sick a week after 9/11 when it actually was three weeks.
And the FBI spent the entire first two months of the investigation trying to tie the anthrax attacks to the 9/11 hijackers, contrary to the idiotic assertions of most on FR, they didn't instantly decide it was a domestic terrorist and immediately write off foreign involvement.
10 posted on
05/11/2003 7:32:41 AM PDT by
John H K
To: VaBthang4
The anthrax mailings came a little after 9/11, but I still think Arab terrorists were behind them, whether Hatfill really had anything to do with them or not. Which doesn't mean the new 'Pond Theory' won't reveal anything. Hopefully it will.
40 posted on
05/11/2003 3:24:12 PM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson