 the movie |
Posted on 05/10/2003 6:05:15 PM PDT by dixie sass
Subject: Bert Kinzey discusses CNN
Bert Kinzey is a former Army officer who became an expert in military aviation and has authored literally dozens of books, principally aimed at the aviation enthusiast and scale modeler, and that are definitely apolitical.
However, with his research efforts on military subjects he has gained a wealth of contacts within the U.S. military, and is one of the premier authorities on military subjects in this country. Please read what Bert has to say about CNN.
A letter from Bert Kinzey:
Hello, Everyone,
As many of you know, although some do not, I wrote a book about the Gulf War shortly after it ended in 1991. It was published by McGraw Hill, and was titled, "The Fury of Desert Storm, the Air Campaign." While that book's primary focus was on the air war, much of it also addressed the news coverage of the war. I pointed out how there were two big losers during that war; Iraq and the news media.
Both the news media and Iraq had many things in common, one of which was that they brought their problems on themselves. I explained how the news media, particularly CNN, inaccurately reported the war, misstated the facts, and in many cases deliberately told outright lies. I dedicated an entire chapter to a dishonest CNN report about the B-1 bomber and evaluated its inaccuracies line by line. I illustrated that the report was full of lies, and these were about clearly established facts and not someone's opinion.
I spoke in person to the people in the Pentagon that CNN had interviewed and filmed for that report, and they told me how CNN edited what they said to make it seem like they were saying exactly the opposite of what they actually said. I spoke with CNN's people here in Atlanta and at the Pentagon, including Wolf Blitzer, and he admitted he knew nothing about the military. A CNN employee in Atlanta admitted to me that they did not care if they got their reporting accurate. They only wanted to get it on the air first and in the most dramatic manner possible. Their primary purpose was to make money by selling ad space, not reporting the news accurately.
Unfortunately, twelve years later, the situation has not improved at CNN. I have watched them as well as other news sources recently, and their lies and inaccuracies are even more common than they were in 1991. Their bias is also beyond belief. They are showing almost exclusively an anti-war stance by people who are so delusional that they believe that peace is merely the absence of war. While everyone has their own bias, including news organizations, it is neither professional nor honest to concentrate almost exclusively on one side of an issue, particularly one so important as this.
To do so presents an inaccurate and dishonest view of what is actually happening, and this does not allow viewers to form informed and valid opinions.
For example, CNN concentrates almost exclusively on those few nations that are against us in this effort and makes almost no mention of the many more that are supporting us. They ignore and do not report on our success in Afghanistan where we have returned women to classrooms and professional occupations and where people are returning to that country with expectations for a bright future free of terror, all thanks to America. Before we drove out the Taliban, people were fleeing Afghanistan.
CNN also makes the viewer believe that those who protest the war are in far greater numbers than those supporting it. This is clearly not the case, and even CNN's own surveys show that 66% of Americans support military action to disarm Iraq. (ABC and FOX surveys place that percent in the upper 70s.)
For example, this past Saturday, over 3,000 people turned out in Atlanta, the home of CNN, to support the war on a dreary and rainy day. At the same time, there was an anti-war rally in Atlanta that was attended by twenty-two, that's right TWENTY-TWO protesters. CNN covered the 22-person anti-war rally.
I recently heard the percentage of students that protested the war at universities across America, and in almost every case, it was less than one percent. That means that ninety-nine percent did not protest against the war, and in many cases the number gathering to support President Bush and our troops far exceeded the number who protested against it. But CNN reports the protestors. CNN has an obligation to present all sides in a balanced manner, but CNN skews their coverage extremely in one direction. In my view, their coverage with its inaccuracies, lies, distortions, and "blame America first" is nothing short of criminal. They should have lost the trust of America.
CNN has seldom reported much about continuing atrocities committed by Saddam Hussein throughout his time in power. Here is a man who has attacked his neighbor to the east (Iran) and his neighbor to the southeast (Kuwait). He has fired missiles at his neighbors to the southwest and the west. Hussein has gassed his own people and he habitually tortures those that who disagree with him. He has had the wives and children of dissidents brought in and tortured, raped, before their very eyes of family members. Here is a man who destroys oil wells and dams to create ecological disasters, and kills the Iraqi people, his own people.
On the other side of the coin are the Americans who will bring freedom from this oppression to the Iraqis, who will bring food and medicine to them, who will protect Iraq's infrastructure, and who will treat Iraqi prisoners who surrender in a humane way. But CNN constantly makes America out to be the bad guy!
If you, like me, believe that the freedom of the press carries with it an obligation to be accurate, fair, balanced, and honest, I ask you to do two things. First, please pass this e-mail on to people you know so that they may realize what CNN is doing. Second, I ask you to stop the lies, turn off CNN, and send them an e-mail that you are doing so. I ask you to look elsewhere for your news coverage. I find the FOX News Network, The News Hour on PBS and MSNBC to be far more fair. Sure, there is some bias anywhere, but it is not so extreme nor calculated. On these networks I hear both sides about equally. I hear about France like I do on CNN, but I also hear about Japan and Australia as well as the many other countries that are backing us in so many ways.
As of today, three countries in Europe are against us, and twenty-two have come out in support of us. Most of the twenty-two have never been mentioned on CNN, but representatives of France and Germany are on CNN almost hourly.
So please take a look at several news choices and find one that is accurate, fair, and balanced. It is the only way to get an honest view of what is going on. I am not telling you which one to choose, I'm only asking you to turn off CNN.
It is not in my present plans to write another book for the general public on this war. But that may change. I am so sickened by the reporting of CNN that I may just do so. If I do, I will not focus on the air war this time.
Instead I will simply state the facts that clearly prove that CNN is lying and distorting the news about our country, our leaders, and our military.
Finally, I would like to remind you to do a third thing. As some of you know, I have a son who is a Navy pilot and has been flying missions in the Middle East since last November. So as the father of one of our deployed military personnel, and as a former Army officer myself, I ask all of you to remember our troops, support them, and pray for them even more than you usually do in these critical days ahead. I know many of you also have family members or friends who are over there ready to do their jobs in support of our country. It is those troops who keep us free, and who are ready to lay down their lives to protect our country. It is not the movie stars nor the news reporters who protect us.
For those of you who pass this on to your friends, I thank you for your help in spreading the word about CNN. God bless America, -- Bert Kinzey
J. Bruce Medaris, CPE Lt.Col. (USA-Ret) 2 Fleetwood Drive Huntington Bay, NY 11743 Phone: 631-673-1959 FAX: 631-424-9896
James H. Cook Lt. Col. (USA-Ret) Arlington, VA
I was in the Middle East when the Somalia conflict started. I was in a unique position of working at a satellite earth station that routed TV traffic to various spots around the world.
To make a long story short, I watched a 15 minute raw video feed out of Somalia (just un-edited video; no sound), then saw the edited and sanitized story on CNN at my hotel room that night--it was the exact opposite of what had happened.
And don't forget, "the mattress with a microphone," Christiane Amanpour.
I remember in the early '90's, CBS's 60 Minutes did a spot on her where she said to Morley Safer that an RPG-7 grenade hit the hotel room adjacent to her while she was reporting the war in Sarajevo. I must confess to y'all that naughty little devil on my left shoulder said to me, "Too bad it didn't hit her!"
hyperlinked images of shame |
|
|
by Mia T, 4.6.03 Mia T, THE ALIENS Al From is sounding the alarm. "Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections." Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem. From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason. That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically. When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.) Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent. With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity. With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity. The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11. |
To make a long story short, I watched a 15 minute raw video feed out of Somalia (just un-edited video; no sound), then saw the edited and sanitized story on CNN at my hotel room that night--it was the exact opposite of what had happened.
A quick look at CNN's numbers tells us the market economy is doing it's job: CNN's going down.
To make a long story short, I watched a 15 minute raw video feed out of Somalia (just un-edited video; no sound), then saw the edited and sanitized story on CNN at my hotel room that night--it was the exact opposite of what had happened.
Camcorder!
My TV won't pick it up.
CNN also manages to get Chirac's hate who will present a state French TV to compete with BBC and CNN worldwide. They claim CNN is US outfit biased against them.... LOL!
CNN now has liberal foreign competitors who hate it. This network is really the stupid network.
Proof that there is a God, and he has a keen sense of humor.
Thanks for that info, I didn't know that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.