Posted on 05/10/2003 7:41:45 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
Fighting mad doctors are fed up with Democrats screwing with the lives of the American people. Published on this website are the names and specialties of physicians and surgeons who have been driven from their practices by the abuse of malpractice insurance companies.
Mr. Gephardt and the other DNC Presidential candidates appeared with George Stephanopoulos conducting a panel forum last week. Several of the candidates stated that they wanted to create a new nationalized healthcare system (as if HillaryCare wasn't a failure enough!).
While the DNC candidates promise "free healthcare" to the voters, the reality is that HMO insurance companies that preferentially send money to the DNC and RAT candidates are responsible for needless death and suffering.
Furthermore, the malpractice insurance companies are engaging in illegal conduct and are forcing physicians out of practice (in order to permit control of medical services by DNC aligned HMOs).
Those of you in Pennsylvania need to keep an eye on the "fightingdocs" of Philadelphia who appear to be making an effort to defend quality of care for the American people.
Dem State Senator Supports Docs In Pa.
Doctors Tell County Council Of Their Malpractice Insurance Plight
" Actually, since hubby's neck is fine, I guess I won't quibble with the guy's work, but his bedside manner was really unacceptable."
*******************************************************
One of the best surgeons I know....is considered a control freak perfectionist...by the staff. And many of them fear him or hate him. Besides that he has marginal bedside manner........
But I happen to like the guy..and would "use" him in a heartbeat..!!
BWDIK........
The root problem is this ->admiting ANY human being that breathes into medical school based on ANYTHING but MERIT is your root problem. The medical industry at LARGE refuses to address the massive incompetency that is ongoing in their profession. They refuse to take away licenses from doctors that are incompetent. It's similar to the old days with the police - where there is a wall of silence when it comes to weeding out those that have NO business in that profession.
SO till they clean house, I don't care how high their liability rates go. If need be, let them drive out the incompetent ones through lawsuits. The good doctors don't have lawsuits and their liability insurance is more affordable. That is the ugly truth about the situation.
Don't think "home emergency room" 's going to cut it.
re: I don't care how high their liability rates go.
I see. Should your hospital administration, driven out of business, care when you don't get the treatment you need, when you need it?
You'll need to provide this board with some protections, too, or no one will serve on it.
If I could suggest, a peer-review board to weed out some of the lawsuits would help, too. If there is accountability and sensible limitations, I think you'll find that docs and hospital admins want to see patients compensated. It was doctors, historically, who started the insurance in their first place. It's the lottery and circus atmospherics that have made all dig in their heels.
Proper stewardship is the answer. The system can no longer support a class of parasites in fabulous luxury.
People assume automatically that this is general law, but consider how such a law would be enforced. It would be unworkable. You'd have to define levels (trauma) of services, nature of what is required--and these are left to the boards of hospitals.
Now--the ER is a big money-loser even without the problem of liability insurance. Under better circumstances than is seen in PA, hospitals lose 40-60% on every patient in the ER. But it IS law that an ER see and evaluate all comers, and the ER usually ends up treating all comers, too. Add to that that illegal aliens know this, and use the ER. The pressures to close these departments are staggering.
So, why keep any open?
It'll amaze you, the answer. Because the boards recognize that such a service is part of their duty to the community, part of their mission as a hosptial, part of the essential identity of what they are and what they do.
So when you want to moan about the long waits and grumpy nurses--remember they could just shut it down.
Part of me really wishes they would, that Atlas would shrug.
Or are they mad about high malpractice insurance premiums? There is a difference.
If it's just the high premiums, the DemocRAT'S solution will be to have the premiums paid by the government (i.e. the taxpayers). This is not desired at all. It is the WRONG solution.
The correct solution is to severely narrow the scope for trial attorney action, fees, and restrict liability. In addition malpractice should be criminalized, not kept as a feeding ground for the trial lawyers.
If there's no money in it, the problem goes away. Don't just shift the cost to the taxpayers.
What makes a doctor "bad"?
And once they are "weeded out", who will do the work they do now?
Please define "massive incompetency".
Please relate your definition to the ability to a) Graduate from college, b) Graduate from medical school, c) Pass National Boards, d) Pass certifying exams, e) Pass license exams, f) Get staff privileges and keep them.
What is your concept of malpractice as a criminal act? (i.e., what would I have to do to be guilty of this "crime"?)
LOLOL. Yes, I believe you're correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.