Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beelzebubba
But wait, if we do not vote for Bush those bad old democrats will be in power. What the hell is the difference, not a dimes worth.
10 posted on 05/08/2003 8:06:11 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cynicom
What the hell is the difference, not a dimes worth.

So,

Ronald Reagan = Jimmy Carter?

Al Gore = Dick Cheney?

Phil Graham = Hillary Clinton?

"Not a dimes worth?" Some might not agree......

14 posted on 05/08/2003 8:18:17 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (This tag line has expired but I hope to renew it at the DMV soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cynicom
I cannot believe anyone is dumb enough to actually believe this remark---then again, after living over 80 years, I have met a lot of dumb people
17 posted on 05/08/2003 8:21:29 PM PDT by cmotormac44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cynicom
But wait, if we do not vote for Bush those bad old democrats will be in power

Depends which election you're talking about.

I can't think of a firmer message to Mr. Rove-Bush than to vote for a local, conservative, Republican opponent in the early Republican primaries.

By about the third or fourth primary these two conservative pretenders will get the message loud and clear.

22 posted on 05/08/2003 8:25:08 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cynicom
What the hell is the difference, not a dimes worth.

You just proved Rove's point. Most of the people who feel strongly on this issue did not vote for Bush or Gore either.

What Rove was saying to the author of this diatribe is that he knows you are liars. You did not and will not vote for Bush because you did not and don't see a dimes worth of difference between Bush and Gore. The end result of your position on elections, is your vote does not make a dimes worth of difference in the outcome of an election. Between elections you try to convince politicians that if they just adopted your view you would vote for them. Politicians know that to pick up one vote from people like you, costs 50 other votes. Therefore no politician even needs to be nice to you. He can even pick up a few votes by being very rude to you. Rove was not nice to the author becuase the author of this diatribe will have no effect on the 2004 election.

You are absolutely clueless. You think bluster can influence a pro like Rove. The positions taken by all politicians are designed to get the most votes. If most voters agreed with you, there would be no need to talk to any politian. They would all support and pass into law what you want passed. Since the public does not agree with you, politicians tell you to go hump a tree.

The only thing that influences politial operatives like Rove is votes. And you and your ilk ain't got them.

50 posted on 05/08/2003 8:53:37 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cynicom
Anyone who thinks that there's no difference between the parties after the last 2 years of G W Bush's administration is smoking some very strange stuff. Anyone who would vote for a Dem based on this one bill which is not really an impediment to the 2nd amendment is really not thinking clearly. A politician certainly has to maneuver through many issues. To think that you can get 100% your way is totally unrealistic. On balance GWB is doing an outstanding job of moving the ball forward on conservative positions.
101 posted on 05/09/2003 9:31:32 AM PDT by Bill S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson